Advertisement

Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 819–843 | Cite as

The Prevalence of Pathological Gambling Among College Students: A Meta-analytic Synthesis, 2005–2013

  • Donald E. NowakEmail author
  • Ariel M. Aloe
Original Paper

Abstract

The problem of gambling addiction can be especially noteworthy among college and university students, many of whom have the resources, proximity, free time, and desire to become involved in the myriad options of gambling now available. Although limited attention has been paid specifically to college student gambling in the body of literature, there have been two published meta-analyses estimating the prevalence of probable pathological gambling among college students. This present study aims to be the third, presenting an up-to-date proportion of those students exhibiting gambling pathology, and is the first to include international studies from outside the United States and Canada. The purpose of this study was to use the most up-to-date meta-analytical procedures to synthesize the rates of probable pathological gambling for college and university students worldwide. A thorough literature review and coding procedure resulted in 19 independent data estimates retrieved from 18 studies conducted between 2005 and 2013. To synthesize the studies, a random effects model for meta-analysis was applied. The estimated proportion of probable pathological gamblers among the over 13,000 college students surveyed was computed at 10.23 %, considerably higher than either of the two previously published meta-analyses, and more than double the rate reported in the first meta-analysis of this type published in 1999. Implications and recommendations for future practice in dealing with college students and gambling addiction are outlined and described for both administrators and mental health professionals.

Keywords

Pathological gambling College students Prevalence Meta-analysis 

References

Studies marked with an asterisk (*) were included in the meta-analysis.

  1. Adams, G. R., Sullivan, A., Horton, K. D., Menna, R., & Guilmette, A. (2007). A study of differences in Canadian university students’ gambling and proximity to a casino. Journal of Gambling Issues, 19, 9–18. doi: 10.4309/jgi.2007.19.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text revision ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  3. *Arthur, D., Tong, W., Chen, C., Hing, A., Sagara-Rosemeyer, M., Kua, E., & Ignacio, J. (2008). The validity and reliability of four measures of gambling behaviour in a sample of Singapore university students. Journal of Gambling Studies, 24(4), 451–462. doi: 10.1007/s10899-008-9103-y.Google Scholar
  4. Bailey, E. A., Burroughs, S. W., Dabit, J. S., Hambrick, R. S., & Theriot, P. B. (1997). The lure of casino gambling and its potential impact on college students in Mississippi. College Student Affairs Journal, 17, 81–92.Google Scholar
  5. Barnes, G. M., Welte, J. W., Hoffman, J. H., & Tidwell, M. C. (2010). Comparisons of gambling and alcohol use among college students and noncollege young people in the United States. Journal of American College Health, 58(5), 443–452.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beaudoin, C. M., & Cox, B. J. (1999). Characteristics of problem gambling in a Canadian context: A preliminary study using a DSM-IV-based questionnaire. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 44, 483–487.Google Scholar
  7. Becker, B. J. (2000). Multivariate meta-analysis. In H. E. A. Tinsley & S. D. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (pp. 499–525). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Benston, L. (2009, November 23). Illness theory gaining ground for gambling addiction. Las Vegas Sun. Retrieved from http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2009/nov/23/illness-theory-gaining-ground/.
  9. Blaszczynski, A., & Nower, L. (2002). A pathways model of problem and pathological gambling. Addiction, 97(5), 487–499. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00015.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blaszczynski, A., Ladouceur, R., & Moodie, C. (2008). The Sydney Laval universities gambling screen: Preliminary data. Addiction Research & Theory, 16(4), 401–411. doi: 10.1080/16066350701699031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blinn-Pike, L., Lokken Worthy, S., & Jonkman, J. N. (2007). Disordered gambling among college students: A meta-analytic synthesis. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23(2), 175–183. doi: 10.1007/s10899-006-9036-2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester, UK: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. *Burger, T. D. (2007). College students and gambling: Gauging the effects of gender on impulse control, sensation seeking, and mental health as predictors of involvement. Dissertation Abstracts International, 67.Google Scholar
  14. Burger, T. D., Dahlgren, D., & MacDonald, C. D. (2006). College students and gambling: An examination of gender differences in motivation for participation. College Student Journal, 40, 704–714.Google Scholar
  15. *Butler, L. (2011). Using the multiple choice procedure to measure college student gambling. Dissertation Abstracts International, 71.Google Scholar
  16. Caswell, J. (2006). Listening to their stories: Students’ perspectives about campus gambling. In G. S. McClellan, T. W. Hardy, & J. Caswell (Eds.), Gambling on campus: New directions for student services (pp. 25–32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  17. Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (2009). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  18. Dickerson, M. (2003). The evolving contribution of gambling research to addiction theory. Addiction, 98(6), 709. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00415.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455–463.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ellenbogen, S., Jacobs, D., Derevensky, J., Gupta, R., & Paskus, T. (2008). Gambling behavior among college student-athletes. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 20(3), 349–362. doi: 10.1080/10413200802056685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Engwall, D., Hunter, R., & Steinberg, M. (2004). Gambling and other risk behaviors on university campuses. Journal of American College Health, 52(6), 245–255. doi: 10.3200/JACH.52.6.245-256.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. *Fortune, E. E., & Goodie, A. S. (2010). Comparing the utility of a modified Diagnostic Interview for Gambling Severity (DIGS) with the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS) as a research screen in college students. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26(4), 639–644. doi: 10.1007/s10899-010-9189-x.Google Scholar
  23. *Goodie, A. S. (2005). The role of perceived control and overconfidence in pathological gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 21(4), 481–502. doi: 10.1007/s10899-005-5559-1.Google Scholar
  24. Grant, J., Kim, S., Hollander, E., & Potenza, M. (2008). Predicting response to opiate antagonists and placebo in the treatment of pathological gambling. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 200(4), 521–527. doi: 10.1007/s00213-008-1235-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gupta, R., & Derevensky, J. L. (1998). An empirical examination of Jacobs’ General Theory of Addictions: Do adolescent gamblers fit the theory? Journal of Gambling Studies, 14(1), 17–49. doi: 10.1023/A:1023046509031.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hardy, T. W. (2006). A minute to learn and a lifetime to master: Implication of the poker craze for college campuses. In G. S. McClellan, T. W. Hardy, & J. Caswell (Eds.), Gambling on campus: New directions for student services (pp. 33–41). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  27. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hodgins, D., Stea, J., & Grant, J. (2011). Gambling disorders. Lancet, 378(9806), 1874–1884. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62185-X.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jacobs, D. F. (1986). A general theory of addictions: A new theoretical model. Journal of Gambling Behavior, 2, 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jacobs, D. F. (1989). Illegal and undocumented: A review of teenage gambling and the plight of children of problem gamblers in America. In H. J. Shaffer, S. A. Stein, & B. Gambino (Eds.), Compulsive gambling: Theory, research, and practice. Toronto: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  31. Kessler, R., Hwang, I., LaBrie, R., Petukhova, M., Sampson, N., Winters, K., et al. (2008). DSM-IV pathological gambling in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Psychological Medicine, 38(9), 1351–1360. doi: 10.1017/S0033291708002900.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. *Kido, M., & Shimazaki, T. (2007). Reliability and validity of the modified Japanese version of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS). Japanese Journal of Psychology, 77(6), 547–552. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.77.547.Google Scholar
  33. *Kuentzel, J. G., Henderson, M. J., & Melville, C. L. (2008). The impact of social desirability biases on self-report among college student and problem gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 24(3), 307–319. doi: 10.1007/s10899-008-9094-8.Google Scholar
  34. LaBrie, R. A., Shaffer, H. J., LaPlante, D. A., & Wechsler, H. (2003). Correlates of college student gambling in the United States. The Journal of American College Health, 52(22), 53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ladouceur, R. (2004). Gambling: The hidden addiction. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry/La Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie, 49(8), 501–503.Google Scholar
  36. Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1184–1188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Lesieur, H. R., Cross, J., Frank, M., Welch, M., White, C. M., et al. (1991). Gambling and pathological gambling among university students. Addictive Behaviors, 16(6), 517–527.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. *Locke, G. W., Shilkret, R., Everett, J. E., & Petry, N. M. (2013). Interpersonal guilt in college student pathological gamblers. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 39(1), 28–32.Google Scholar
  39. McClellan, G. S., Caswell, J., Beck, B., Holladay, C. G., Mitchell, A. A., & O’Connor, K. W. (2002). Gambling, its effects and prevalence on college campuses: Implications for student affairs. NASPA Center for Research on Student Life and Demographics, Invited Paper. Google Scholar
  40. *McClellan, G. S., & Winters, K. C. (2006). Gambling: An old school new wave challenge for higher education in the twenty-first century. In G. S. McClellan, T. W. Hardy, & J. Caswell (Eds.), Gambling on campus: New directions for student services (pp. 9–23). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  41. McComb, J. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2009). Problem gambling on college campuses. NASPA Journal, 46(1), 1–29.Google Scholar
  42. *Moodie, C. (2008). Student gambling, erroneous cognitions, and awareness of treatment in Scotland. Journal of Gambling Issues, 21, 30–55. doi: 10.4309/jgi.2008.21.5.Google Scholar
  43. National Collegiate Athletic Association. (2003). NCAA national study on collegiate sports wagering and associated health-risk behaviors. Indianapolis, IN: The National Collegiate Athletic Association.Google Scholar
  44. Neighbors, C., Lostutter, T. W., Whiteside, U., Fossos, N., Walker, D. D., & Larimer, M. E. (2007). Injunctive norms and problem gambling among college students. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23(3), 259–273. doi: 10.1007/s10899-007-9059-3.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Oster, S. L., & Knapp, T. J. (1998). Sports betting among college students: Who bets and how often? College Student Journal, 32, 289–292.Google Scholar
  46. *Oyebisi, E. O., Alao, K. A., & Popoola, B. I. (2012). Gambling behaviour of university students in South-Western Nigeria. IFE Psychologia: An International Journal, 20(1), 250–260.Google Scholar
  47. *Parker, J. A., Wood, L. M., Bond, B. J., & Shaughnessy, P. (2005). Alexithymia in young adulthood: A risk factor for pathological gambling. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 74(1), 51–55. doi: 10.1159/000082027.Google Scholar
  48. Petry, N. M. (2005). Pathological gambling: Etiology, cormorbidity, and treatment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Assocation.Google Scholar
  49. Petry, N. M. (2010). Pathological gambling and the DSM-V. Journal of International Gambling Studies, 10, 113–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. *Petry, N. M., & Weinstock, J. (2007). Internet gambling is common in college students and associated with poor mental health. The American Journal on Addictions, 16(5), 325–330. doi: 10.1080/10550490701525673.Google Scholar
  51. *Platz, L., Knapp, T. J., & Crossman, E. W. (2005). Gambling by underage college students: Preferences and pathology. College Student Journal, 39(1), 3–6.Google Scholar
  52. R Core Team. (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org.
  53. Rockey, D. L, Jr, Rockey, C. M., Beason, K. R., Gilbert, J. D., & Howington, E. B. (2005). Gambling by Greek-affiliated college students: An association between affiliation and gambling. Journal of College Student Development, 46(1), 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Shaffer, H. J., & Hall, M. N. (2001). Updating and refining prevalence estimates of disordered gambling and behaviour in the United States and Canada. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 92, 168–172.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Shaffer, H. J., Hall, M. N., & Vander Bilt, J. (1999). Estimating the prevalence of disordered gambling behavior in the United States and Canada: A research synthesis. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 1369–1376.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stinchfield, R. (2002). Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS). Addictive Behaviors, 27(1), 1–19. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4603(00)00158-1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stinchfield, R., Hanson, W. E., & Olson, D. H. (2006). Problem and pathological gambling among college students. In G. S. McClellan, T. W. Hardy, & J. Caswell (Eds.), Gambling on campus: New directions for student services (pp. 63–72). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  59. Stuart, E. (2011, August 9). Gambling on the rise: Is America becoming addicted? Deseret News. Retrieved from http://www.deseretnews.com/article/700169522/Gambling-on-the-rise-Is-America-becoming-addicted.html?pg=all.
  60. Stuhldreher, W. L., Stuhldreher, T. J., & Forrest, K. Z. (2007). Gambling as an emerging health problem on campus. Journal of American College Health, 56(1), 75–83. doi: 10.3200/JACH.56.1.75-88.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sumitra, L. M., & Miller, S. C. (2005). Pathologic gambling disorder. Postgraduate Medicine, 118(1), 31–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Takushi, R. Y., Neighbors, C., Larimer, M. E., Lostutter, T. W., Cronce, J. M., & Marlatt, G. (2004). Indicated prevention of problem gambling among college students. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20(1), 83–93. doi: 10.1023/B:JOGS.0000016705.58903.8f.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. *Tang, C., & Wu, A. S. (2009). Screening for college problem gambling in Chinese societies: Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (C-SOGS). International Gambling Studies, 9(3), 263–274.Google Scholar
  64. Toneatto, T. (2008). Reliability and validity of the Gamblers Anonymous Twenty Questions. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 30(1), 71–78. doi: 10.1007/s10862-007-9070-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1–48.Google Scholar
  66. Walker, M. B. (1989). Some problems with the concept of ‘gambling addiction’: Should theories of addiction be generalized to include excessive gambling? Journal of Gambling Behavior, 5(3), 179–200. doi: 10.1007/BF01024386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. *Weinstock, J., & Petry, N. M. (2008). Pathological gambling college students’ perceived social support. Journal of College Student Development, 49(6), 625–632. doi: 10.1353/csd.0.0047.Google Scholar
  68. *Weinstock, J., Whelan, J. P., Meyers, A. W., & McCausland, C. (2007). The performance of two pathological gambling screens in college students. Assessment, 14(4), 399–407. doi: 10.1177/1073191107305273.Google Scholar
  69. Weiss, S. M., & Loubier, S. L. (2008). Gambling behaviors of former athletes: The delayed competitive effect. UNLV Gaming Research & Review Journal, 12(1–2), 53–60.Google Scholar
  70. *Wickwire, E. R., Whelan, J. P., Meyers, A. W., McCausland, C., Luellen, J., & Studaway, A. (2008). Environmental correlates of gambling behavior among college students: A partial application of problem behavior theory to gambling. Journal of College Student Development, 49(5), 459–475. doi: 10.1353/csd.0.0030.Google Scholar
  71. *Wickwire, E. R., Whelan, J. P., West, R., Meyers, A., McCausland, C., & Leullen, J. (2007). Perceived availability, risks, and benefits of gambling among college students. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23(4), 395–408. doi: 10.1007/s10899-007-9057-5.Google Scholar
  72. World Health Organization. (1992). International classification of diseases: Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Counseling, School, and Educational Psychology, Graduate School of EducationState University of New York at BuffaloBuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations