Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 803–818 | Cite as

Prevention of Problematic Gambling Behavior Among Adolescents: Testing the Efficacy of an Integrative Intervention

  • Maria Anna Donati
  • Caterina Primi
  • Francesca Chiesi
Original Paper

Abstract

This study aimed at testing the efficacy of an integrative intervention to prevent adolescent problem gambling acting on a multidimensional set of factors including gambling related knowledge and misconceptions, economic perception of gambling, and superstitious thinking. A pre- and post-test design was performed with 181 Italian adolescents (64 % boys; Mean age = 15.95) randomly assigned to two groups (Training and No Training). Results revealed that the intervention was effective in improving correct knowledge about gambling and reducing misconceptions, perception of gambling’s profitability, and superstitious thinking. Except for misconceptions, these effects were obtained both in participants who were classified as Non-problem and At-Risk/Problem gamblers at the beginning of the intervention. Findings attested also that the training effects were stable over time, and that some changes in gambling behavior were produced. Findings were discussed referring to indications for future research aiming at confirming and extending the present results.

Keywords

Adolescents Prevention Problematic gambling Training Mixed ANOVA 

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. (3rd ed., rev.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  2. Blaszczynski, A., Ladoucer, F., & Shaffer, H. J. (2004). A science-based framework for responsible gambling: The Reno model. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20, 301–317. doi:10.1023/B:JOGS.0000040281.49444.e2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blinn-Pike, L., Worthy, S. L., & Jonkman, J. N. (2010). Adolescent gambling: A review of an emerging field of research. Journal of Adolescent Health, 47, 223–236. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.05.003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Capitanucci, D., Smaniotto, R., & Biganzoli, A. (2010). La prevenzione del gioco d’azzardo problematico negli adolescenti attraverso l’adattamento del video Lucky. Quaderno Italiani di Psichiatria, 29, 30–39. doi:10.1016/j.quip.2010.04.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chiesi, F., Donati, M. A., Galli, S., & Primi, C. (2013). The suitability of the SOGS-RA as screening tool: Item response theory-based evidence. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 27(1), 287–293. doi:10.1037/a0029987.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chiesi, F., Donati, M. A., Papi, C., & Primi, C. (2010). Misurare il pensiero superstizioso nei bambini: Validità e attendibilità della Superstitious Thinking Scale. Età Evolutiva, 97, 9–19.Google Scholar
  7. Chiu, J., & Storm, L. (2010). Personality, perceived luck and gambling attitudes as predictors of gambling involvement. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26, 205–227. doi:10.1007/s10899-009-9160-x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Colasante, E., Gori, M., Bastiani, L., Scalese, M., Siciliano, V., & Molinaro, S. (2013). Italian adolescent gambling behaviour: Psychometric evaluation of the South Oaks gambling screen—Revised for adolescents (SOGS-RA) among a sample of Italian students. Journal of Gambling Studies,. doi:10.1007/s10899-013-9385-6.Google Scholar
  10. Delfabbro, P. (2004). The stubborn logic of regular gamblers: Obstacles and dilemmas in cognitive gambling research. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20, 1–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Delfabbro, P., Lahn, J., & Grabosky, P. (2006). It’s not what you know, but how you use it: Statistical knowledge and adolescent problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 22, 179–193. doi:10.1007/s10899-006-9009-5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Delfabbro, P., Lambos, C., King, D., & Puglies, S. (2009). Knowledge and beliefs about gambling in Australian secondary school students and their implications for education strategies. Journal of Gambling Studies, 25, 523–539. doi:10.1007/s10899-009-9141-0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Delfabbro, P., & Thrupp, L. (2003). The social determinants of youth gambling in South Australian adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 26, 313–330. doi:10.1016/S0140-1971(03)00013-7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Derevensky, J. L., Sklar, A., Gupta, R., & Messerlian, C. (2010). An empirical study examining the impact of gambling advertisements on adolescent gambling attitudes and behaviors. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 8, 21–34. doi:10.1007/s11469-009-9211-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dickson-Gillispie, L., Rugle, L., Rosenthal, R., & Fong, T. (2008). Preventing the incidence and harm of gambling problems. Journal of Primary Prevention, 29, 37–55. doi:10.1007/s10935-008-0126-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Donati, M. A., Chiesi, F., & Primi, C. (2013). A model to explain at risk/problem gambling among male and female adolescents: Gender similarities and differences. Journal of Adolescence, 36, 129–137. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.10.001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ferland, F., Ladoucer, R., & Vitaro, F. (2002). Prevention of problem gambling: Modifying misconceptions and increasing knowledge. Journal of Gambling Studies, 18, 19–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ferland, F., Ladouceur, R., & Vitaro, F. (2005). Efficiency of a gambling prevention program for youths: Results from the pilot study. Encephale, 31, 427–436.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gaboury, A., & Ladouceur, R. (1993). Evaluation of a prevention program for pathological gambling among adolescents. Journal of Primary Prevention, 14, 21–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (2002). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gupta, R., Derevenksy, J. L., & Marget, N. (2004). Coping strategies employed by adolescents with gambling problems. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 9(3), 115–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gupta, R., & Derevensky, J. L. (2000). Adolescents with gambling problems. From research to treatment. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16, 315–342.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Klaczynski, P. A. (2004). A dual-process model of adolescent development: Implications for decision making, reasoning, and identity. In R. V. Kail (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (pp. 73–123). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  24. Kokis, J. V., MacPherson, R., Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2002). Heuristic and analytic processing: Age trends and associations with cognitive ability and cognitive styles. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 83, 26–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ladouceur, R. (2001). Conceptual issues in screening and diagnostic instruments: Implications for treatment and prevention of gambling disorders. Paper presented at the Toward Meaningful Diagnosis of Gambling Disorders: From theory to practice conference, Las Vegas, Nevada.Google Scholar
  26. Ladouceur, R., Ferland, F., & Vitaro, F. (2004). Prevention of problem gambling: Modifying misconceptions and increasing knowledge among youths. Journal of Primary Prevention, 25, 329–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ladouceur, R., Ferland, F., Vitaro, F., & Pelletier, O. (2005). Modifying youths’ perception toward pathological gamblers. Addictive Behaviors, 30, 351–354.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ladouceur, R., & Walker, M. (1998). The cognitive approach to understanding and treating pathological gambling. In A. S. Bellack & M. Hersen (Eds.), Comprehensive clinical psychology (pp. 588–601). Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  29. Lavoie, M. P. & Ladouceur, R. (2004). Prevention of gambling among youth: Increasing knowledge and modifying attitudes toward gambling. eGambling: The Electronic Journal of Gambling Issues, 10, 1–10.Google Scholar
  30. Ninness, H. A. C., & Ninness, S. K. (1998). Superstitious math performance: Interactions between rule-governed and scheduled contingencies. The Psychological Record, 48, 45–62.Google Scholar
  31. Poulin, C. (2000). Problem gambling among adolescent students in the Atlantic provinces of Canada. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16, 53–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Poulin, C. (2002). An assessment of the validity and reliability of the SOGS-RA. Journal of Gambling Studies, 18, 67–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Primi, C., & Chiesi, F. (2011). The role of relevant knowledge and cognitive ability in gambler fallacy. In The 7th congress of the european society for research in mathematics education (CERME). Rzeszów, Poland. http://www.cerme7.univ.rzeszow.pl/WG/5/CERME_Primi-Chiesi.pdf.
  34. Primi, C., Donati, M., Bellini, I., Busdraghi, C., & Chiesi, F. (2013). Measuring the attitude towards the profitability of gambling: Psychometrics properties of the gambling attitude scale. Bollettino di Psicologia Applicata, 266, 49–58.Google Scholar
  35. Splevins, K., Mireskandari, S., Clayton, K., & Blaszczynski, A. (2010). Prevalence of adolescent problem gambling, related harms and help-seeking behaviours among an Australian population. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26, 189–204. doi:10.1007/s10899-009-9169-1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Taylor, L. M., & Hillyard, P. (2009). Gambling awareness for youth: An analysis of the “Don’t Gamble Away our Future” program. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 7, 250–261. doi:10.1007/s11469-008-9184-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Turner, N. E., Macdonald, J., Bartoshuk, M., & Zangeneh, M. (2008a). Adolescent gambling behaviour, attitudes, and gambling problems. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 6, 223–237. doi:10.1007/s11469-007-9117-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Turner, N. E., Macdonald, J., Bartoshuk, M., & Zangeneh, M. (2008b). The evaluation of a 1-h prevention program for problem gambling. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 6, 238–243. doi:10.1007/s11469-007-9121-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Turner, N. E., Macdonald, J., & Somerset, M. (2008c). Life skills, mathematical reasoning and critical thinking: A curriculum for the prevention of problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 24, 367–380. doi:10.1007/s10899-007-9085-1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tversky, A. (1974). Assessing uncertainty. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 36, 148–159.Google Scholar
  41. Welte, J. W., Barnes, G. M., Tidwell, M. C. O., & Hoffman, J. H. (2009). The association of form of gambling with problem gambling among American youth. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 23(1), 105–112. doi:10.1037/a0013536.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Williams, R. J., West, B., & Simpson, R. (2007). Prevention of problem gambling. In G. Smith, D. Hodgins, & R. J. Williams (Eds.), Research and measurement issues in gambling studies (pp. 399–435). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  43. Williams, R. J., West, B., & Simpson, R. (2008). Prevention of problem gambling: A comprehensive review of the evidence 2008. Report prepared for the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre, Guelph, Ontario, Canada. (Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10133/414).
  44. Williams, R. J., Wood, R. T., & Currie, S. R. (2010). Stacked deck: An effective, school-based program for the prevention of problem gambling. Journal of Primary Prevention, 31, 109–125. doi:10.1007/s10935-010-0212-x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Winters, K. C., Stinchfield, R. D., & Fulkerson, J. (1993). Toward the development of an adolescent gambling problem severity scale. Journal of Gambling Studies, 9, 63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Anna Donati
    • 1
  • Caterina Primi
    • 1
  • Francesca Chiesi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research, and Child’s Health (NEUROFARBA), Section of PsychologyUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly

Personalised recommendations