Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 61–69 | Cite as

Pathological Gambling, Co-occurring Disorders, Clinical Presentation, and Treatment Outcomes at a University-Based Counseling Clinic

  • Adam Soberay
  • J. Michael Faragher
  • Melissa Barbash
  • Amanda Brookover
  • Paul Grimsley
Original Paper

Abstract

It is the intent of this study to examine the relationship between the number of co-occurring disorders in a sample of pathological gamblers and variables associated with clinical presentation and treatment outcomes. Participants were given screening tools for four common psychological disorders: the hands depression screen, the Mood Disorder Questionnaire, the Carroll-Davidson generalized anxiety disorder screen, and the Sprint-4 PTSD Screen. The number of co-occurring disorders, as indicated by the results of these screening instruments, was compared to severity of gambling problems at outset of treatment, as measured by the NORC diagnostic screen for gambling problems-self administered. The number of co-occurring disorders was also compared to psychosocial functioning at the outset of treatment, as well as level of improvement in psychosocial functioning through treatment. Psychosocial functioning was measured using the Outcome Questionnaire 45 (OQ-45). The number of co-occurring disorders was compared to participant satisfaction with the therapeutic relationship as measured by the working alliance inventory-short form. Results suggest that co-occurring disorders are commonplace among treatment seeking pathological gamblers. Over 86 % of the sample screened positively for at least one of the four targeted psychological disorders. Furthermore, the number of co-occurring disorders was found to be positively related to severity of gambling problems at outset of treatment and negatively related to level of psychosocial functioning at outset of treatment. However, the number of co-occurring disorders was not found to be significantly related to level of improvement in psychosocial functioning through treatment. Overall, those that attended at least six sessions reported significantly improved psychosocial functioning by the end of their sixth session. Finally, the number of co-occurring disorders was not found to be significantly related to participants’ reported level of satisfaction with the therapeutic relationship.

Keywords

Gambling Pathological gambling Co-occurring disorders Treatment outcomes Addiction 

References

  1. Baer, L., Jacobs, D., Meszler-Reizes, J., Blais, M., Fava, M., Kessler, R., et al. (2000). Development of a brief screening instruments: The HANDS. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 69(1), 35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, R. A., Evans, D. M., Miller, I. W., Burgess, E. S., & Mueller, T. I. (1997). Cognitive behavioral treatment for depression in alcoholism. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 715–726.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Busseri, M., & Tyler, J. (2003). Interchangeability of the working alliance inventory and working alliance inventory, short form. Psychological Assessment, 15(2), 193–197.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Caroll, B. J., & Davidson, J. R. T. (2000). Screening Scale for DSM-IV GAD. Copyright 2000.Google Scholar
  5. Ciarrocchi, J. W. (2002). Counseling problem gamblers. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  6. Connor, K. M., & Davidson, J. R. T. (2001). SPRINT: A brief global assessment of posttraumatic stress disorder. International Clinical Pharmacology, 16(5), 279–284.Google Scholar
  7. Crisp, B. R., Jackson, A. C., Thomas, S. A., Thomason, N., Smith, S., Borrell, J., et al. (2001). Is more better? The relationship between outcomes achieved by problem gamblers and the number of counselling sessions attended. Australian Social Work, 54, 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dowling, N., Jackson, A. C., & Thomas, S. A. (2008). Behavioral interventions in the treatment of pathological gambling: A review of activity scheduling and desensitization. International Journal of Behavior Consultation and Therapy, 4, 172–187.Google Scholar
  9. Gerstein, D. R., Murphy, S. A., Toce, M. T., Hoffmann, J., Palmer, A., Johnson, R. A., et al. (1999). Gambling impact and behavior study: Report to the national gambling impact study commission. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.Google Scholar
  10. Hirschfeld, R. (2010). The mood disorder questionnaire: Its impact on the field [corrected]. Depression and Anxiety, 27(7), 627–630.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hirschfeld, R., Williams, J., Spitzer, R., Calabrese, J., Flynn, L., Keck, P., et al. (2000). Development and validation of a screening instrument for bipolar spectrum disorder: The mood disorder Questionnaire. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 1873–1875.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Horvath, A. O., & Greenberg, L. S. (1989). Development and validation of the working alliance inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36(2), 223–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jimenez-Murcia, S., Alvarez-Moya, E., Granero, R., Aymami, M. N., Gomez-Pena, M., Jaurrieta, N., et al. (2007). Cognitive behavioral group treatment for pathological gambling: Analysis of effectiveness and predictors of therapy outcome. Psychotherapy Research, 17(5), 544–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kessler, R. C., Berglund, P., Demler, O., Jin, R., Merikangas, K. R., & Walters, E. E. (2005). Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62(6), 593–602.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kessler, R. C., Hwang, I., LaBrie, R., Petukhova, M., Sampson, N. A., Winters, K. C., et al. (2008). DSM-IV pathological gambling in the national comorbidity study replication. Psychological Medicine, 38(9), 1351–1360.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim, S. W., Grant, J. E., Eckert, E. D., Faris, P. L., & Hartman, B. K. (2006). Pathological gambling and mood disorders: Clinical associations and treatment implications. Journal of Affective Disorders, 92, 109–116.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lambert, M. J., & Anderson, E. M. (1996). Assessment for the time-limited psychotherapies. In L. J. Dickstein, M. B. Riba, & J. M. Oldham (Eds.), Review of psychiatry (pp. 23–42). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lambert, M. J., Burlingame, G. M., Umphress, V., Hansen, N. B., Vermeersch, D. A., Clouse, G. C., et al. (1996). The reliability and validity of the outcome Questionnaire. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 3(4), 249–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Leyton-Armakan, J., Lawrence, E., Deutsch, N., Willimas, J. L., & Henneberger, A. (2012). Effective youth mentors: The relationship between initial characteristics of college women mentors and mentee satisfaction and outcome. Journal of Community Psychology, 40(8), 906–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lorains, F. K., Cowlishaw, S., & Thomas, S. A. (2011). Prevalence of comorbid disorders in problem and pathological gambling: Systematic review and meta-analysis of population surveys. Addiction, 106(3), 490–498.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Oei, T., Raylu, N., & Casey, L. (2010). Effectiveness of group and individual formats of a combined motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral treatment program for problem gambling: A randomized controlled trial. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 38, 233–238.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pallesen, S., Mitsem, M., Kvale, G., Johnsen, B. H., & Molde, H. (2005). Outcome of psychological treatments of pathological gambling: A review and meta-analysis. Addiction, 100(10), 1412–1422.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schulte, S. J., Meier, P. S., & Stirling, J. (2011). Dual diagnosis clients’ treatment satisfaction—a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry, 11, 64–75.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sylvain, C., Ladouceur, R., & Boisvert, J. M. (1997). Cognitive and behavioral treatment of pathological gambling: A controlled study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65(5), 727–732.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wickwire, E. M., Burke, R. S., Brown, S. A., Parker, J. D., & May, R. K. (2008). Psychometric evaluation of the national opinion research center DSM-IV screen for gambling problems (NODS). American Journal on Addictions, 17(5), 392–395.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adam Soberay
    • 1
  • J. Michael Faragher
    • 1
  • Melissa Barbash
    • 1
  • Amanda Brookover
    • 1
  • Paul Grimsley
    • 1
  1. 1.Counseling Psychology ProgramUniversity of DenverDenverUSA

Personalised recommendations