Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 71–88 | Cite as

An Empirical Study of Gender Differences in Online Gambling

  • Abby McCormack
  • Gillian W. Shorter
  • Mark D. Griffiths
Original Paper

Abstract

Gambling has typically been considered a predominately male activity. However, recent prevalence surveys have shown greater numbers of females are now gambling. Much of the gambling literature suggests online gamblers are more likely to be male, and that problem gamblers are more likely to be male. Males and females are also likely to be gambling for different reasons and have a preference for different gambling activities. Little is known about the pattern of play among female online gamblers. The aim of this survey was to develop a better profile of female online gamblers and to examine any gender differences between males and females in terms of how and why they gamble online, their frequency of online gambling, patterns of play, as well as attitudes to online gambling. The survey was posted on 32 international online gambling websites and was completed by 975 online gamblers (including 175 female online gamblers). Chi-square tests of association were conducted to examine the association between gender and a range of variables. The results showed that females had been gambling online for a shorter duration of time than males, had much shorter online gambling sessions, different motivations for gambling online (i.e., to practice for free, to spend less money and out of boredom), and experienced online gambling differently to males, with increased feelings of guilt and shame for gambling online. This suggests there is still a stigma around gambling particularly evident among females in this study. The findings indicate that clinicians and treatment providers need to be aware of these potential gender differences in online gambling to develop appropriately tailored interventions.

Keywords

Gambling Online gambling Internet Gender differences 

References

  1. Abbott, M., Volberg, R., & Ronnberg, S. (2004). Comparing the New Zealand and Swedish national surveys of gambling and problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20, 237–258.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, G., & Brown, R. (1984). Real and laboratory gambling, sensation-seeking and arousal. British Journal of Psychology, 75, 401–410.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumeister, R., Vohs, K., & Funder, D. (2007). Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behaviour? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 396–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blaszczynski, A., McConaghy, N., & Frankova, A. (1990). Boredom proneness in pathological gambling. Psychological Reports, 67, 35–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blaszczynski, A., Wilson, A., & McConaghy, N. (1986). Sensation seeking and pathological gambling. British Journal of Addiction, 81, 113–117.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonnaire, C., Lejoyeux, M., & Dardennes, R. (2004). Sensation seeking in a French population of pathological gamblers: Comparison with regular and non-gamblers. Psychological Reports, 94, 1361–1371.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, R. (1986). Arousal and sensation-seeking components in the general explanation of gambling and gambling addictions. International Journal of the Addictions, 21, 1001–1016.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, S., & Coventry, L. (1997). Queen of hearts: The needs of women with gambling problems. Melbourne: Financial and Consumer Rights Council.Google Scholar
  9. Corney, R., & Davis, J. (2010). The attractions and risks of internet gambling for women: A qualitative study. Journal of Gambling Issues, 24, 121–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. EmaxHealth. (2010). Compulsive online gambling affects growing number of women. Located at http://www.emaxhealth.com/1275/49/35139/compulsive-online-gambling-affects-growing-number-women.html. Accessed 27 Sept 2012.
  11. Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index: Final report. Ottawa: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.Google Scholar
  12. Gambling Commission. (2010). Survey data on gambling participation, January 2010. Retrieved from http://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/research__consultations/research/survey_data_on_remote_gam/survey_data_on_remote_gambling.aspx.
  13. Grant, J., & Kim, S. (2002). Gender differences in pathological gamblers seeking medication treatment. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 43, 56–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Griffiths, M. (2001). Internet gambling: Preliminary results of the first U.K. prevalence study. Journal of Gambling Issues, 5. Available at: http://www.camh.net/egambling/issue5/research/griffiths_article.html. Accessed 27 Sept 2012.
  15. Griffiths, M. D. (2011). Technological trends and the psychosocial impact on gambling. Casino and Gaming International, 7(1), 77–80.Google Scholar
  16. Griffiths, M., & Barnes, A. (2008). Internet gambling: An online empirical study among student gamblers. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 6, 194–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Griffiths, M., Wardle, J., Orford, J., Sproston, K., & Erens, B. (2009). Socio-demographic correlates of internet gambling: Findings from the 2007 British Gambling Prevalence Survey. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 12, 199–202.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Griffiths, M. D., & Whitty, M. W. (2010). Online behavioural tracking in Internet gambling research: Ethical and methodological issues. International Journal of Internet Research Ethics, 3, 104–117.Google Scholar
  19. Hing, N., & Breen, H. (2001). Profiling lady luck? An empirical study of gambling and problem gambling amongst female club members. Journal of Gambling Studies, 17, 47–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Holtgraves, T. (2009). Evaluating the problem gambling severity index. Journal of Gambling Studies, 25, 105–120.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jacobs, D. (1986). A general theory of addictions: A new theoretical model. Journal of Gambling Studies, 2, 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. King, D. L., Delfabbro, P. H., & Griffiths, M. D. (2010). The convergence of gambling and digital media: Implications for gambling in young people. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26, 175–187.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. LaBrie, R., Kaplan, S., LaPlante, D., Nelson, S., & Shaffer, H. (2008). Inside the virtual casino: A prospective longitudinal study of internet casino gambling. European Journal of Public Health, 18, 410–416.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. LaBrie, R., LaPlante, D., Nelson, S., Schumann, A., & Shaffer, H. (2007). Assessing the playing field: A prospective longitudinal study of Internet sports gambling behaviour. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23, 231–243.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ladd, G., & Petry, N. (2002). Gender differences among pathological gamblers seeking treatment. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 10, 302–309.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. LaPlante, D., Nelson, S., LaBrie, R., & Shaffer, H. (2006). Men and women playing games: Gender and the gambling preferences of Iowa gambling treatment program participants. Journal of Gambling Studies, 22, 65–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lesieur, H., & Blume, S. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1184–1188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lloyd, J., Doll, H., Hawton, K., Dutton, W., Geddes, J., Goodwin, G., et al. (2010). Internet gamblers: A latent class analysis of their behaviours and health experiences. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26, 387–399.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McBride, J., & Derevensky, J. (2009). Internet gambling behaviour in a sample of online gamblers. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 7, 149–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McCormack, A., & Griffiths, M. (2012). Motivating and inhibiting factors in online gambling behaviour: A grounded theory study. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 10, 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mercer, K., & Eastwood, J. (2010). Is boredom associated with problem gambling behaviour? It depends on what you mean by ‘boredom’. International Gambling Studies, 10, 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nixon, G., Solowoniuk, J., Hagen, B., & Williams, J. (2005). “Double trouble”: The lived experience of problem and pathological gambling in later life. Journal of Gambling Issues, 14. doi:10.4309/jgi.2005.14.10.
  33. Nower, L., & Blaszczynski, A. (2006). Impulsivity and pathological gambling: A descriptive model. International Gambling Studies, 6, 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Orford, J., Griffiths, M., Wardle, H., Sproston, K., & Erens, B. (2009). Negative public attitudes towards gambling: findings from the 2007 British gambling prevalence survey using a new attitude scale. International Gambling Studies, 9, 39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Petry, N., Stinson, F., & Grant, B. (2005). Comorbidity of DSM-IV pathological gambling and other psychiatric disorders: Results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 66, 564–574.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Phillips, J. G., Ogeil, R. P., & Blaszczynski, A. (2011). Electronic interests and behaviours associated with gambling problems. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction,. doi:10.1007/s11469-011-9356-2.Google Scholar
  37. Potenza, M., Steinberg, M., McLaughlin, S., Wu, R., Rounsaville, B., & O’Malley, S. (2001). Gender-related differences in the characteristics of problem gamblers using a gambling helpline. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 1500–1505.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rockloff, M., & Dyer, V. (2007). An experiment on the social facilitation of gambling behaviour. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23, 1–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stewart, D. (2006). An analysis of internet gambling and its policy implications. American Gaming Association. 10th Anniversary White paper series.Google Scholar
  40. Taber, J., McCormick, R., & Ramirez, L. (1987). The prevalence and impact of major life stressors among pathological gamblers. International Journal of the Addictions, 22, 44–48.Google Scholar
  41. Tavares, H., Zilberman, M., Beites, F., & Gentil, V. (2001). Gender differences in gambling progression. Journal of Gambling Studies, 17, 151–159.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Turner, N., Zangeneh, M., & Littman-Sharp, N. (2006). The experience of gambling and its role in problem gambling. International Gambling Studies, 6, 237–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vitaro, F., Arseneault, L., & Tremblay, R. (1997). Dispositional predictors of problem gambling in male adolescents. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154, 12.Google Scholar
  44. Volberg, R., Abbott, M., Ronnberg, S., & Munck, I. (2001). Prevalence and risks of pathological gambling in Sweden. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 104, 250–256.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Volberg, R., Gupta, R., Griffiths, M. D., Olason, D., & Delfabbro, P. H. (2010). An international perspective on youth gambling prevalence studies. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, 22, 3–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Wardle, H., Moody, A., Griffiths, M. D., Orford, J., & Volberg, R. (2011a). Defining the online gambler and patterns of behaviour integration: Evidence from the British gambling prevalence survey 2010. International Gambling Studies, 11, 339–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wardle, H., Moody, A., Spence, S., Orford, J., Volber, R., Jotangia, D., et al. (2011b). British gambling prevalence survey, 2010. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  48. Wardle, H., Sproston, K., Orford, J., Erens, B., Griffiths, M., Constantine, R., et al. (2007). British gambling prevalence survey 2007. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  49. Wenzel, H., & Dahl, A. (2008). Female pathological gamblers: A critical review of the clinical findings. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 7, 190–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wood, R., Griffiths, M., & Parke, J. (2007a). Acquisition, development and maintenance of online poker playing in a student sample. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 10, 354–361.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wood, R., & Williams, R. (2009). Internet gambling: Prevalence, patterns, problems and policy options. Final Report prepared for the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre. Guelph, ON, Canada. January 5, 2009.Google Scholar
  52. Wood, R., Williams, R., & Lawton, P. (2007b). Why do internet gamblers prefer online versus land-based venues? Some preliminary findings and implications. Journal of Gambling Issues, 20, 235–252.Google Scholar
  53. Wynne, H. (2003). Introducing the Canadian problem gambling index. Edmonton, AB: Wynne Resources.Google Scholar
  54. Zacharias, J. (2010). Internet gambling: Is it worth the risk? Located at: http://www.bcresponsiblegambling.ca/other/docs/internet_gambling_jan_zacharias.pdf. Accessed 25 Aug 2010.
  55. Zuckerman, M. (1983). Biological basis of sensation seeking, impulsivity and anxiety. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abby McCormack
    • 1
  • Gillian W. Shorter
    • 2
    • 4
  • Mark D. Griffiths
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Clinical SciencesThe University of NottinghamNottinghamUK
  2. 2.Bamford Centre for Mental Health and WellbeingUniversity of UlsterLondonderryNorthern Ireland, UK
  3. 3.International Gaming Research Unit, Psychology DivisionNottingham Trent UniversityNottinghamUK
  4. 4.MRC All-Ireland Hub for Trials Methodology ResearchUniversity of UlsterLondonderryNorthern Ireland, UK

Personalised recommendations