Behavioral Activation and Inhibition, Negative Affect, and Gambling Severity in a Sample of Young Adult College Students
The prevalence of pathological gambling among college students is increasing. Few studies have directly examined the relation between reward processing and gambling severity while concurrently examining the effects of co-occurring negative affect in this at risk population. This study used Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) techniques to analyze results from an online survey of 352 female and 96 male students age 18–25. Participants completed measures of past year gambling behavior and severity of gambling problems using the Canadian Problem Gambling Index and the Problem Gambling Severity Index. Negative affect and reward processing were measured by the 21-item version of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scales and the Behavioral Inhibition System and Behavioral Activation System (BIS/BAS) scales, respectively. Thirty-five percent of participants reported gambling in the previous 12 months, and 11% had gambling severity scores indicative of “moderate-risk” or “problem gambling.” Gambling severity was associated with negative affect. Negative affect, in turn, was correlated with the unitary BIS scale and inversely associated with the BAS reward responsiveness scale. Reward responsiveness was also inversely associated with gambling severity. In the SEM models, the association between reward responsiveness and gambling severity was mediated by negative affect among males but not among females. Potential explanations for these findings and their implications for addressing problem gambling are discussed.
KeywordsBehavioral inhibition system/behavioral activation system (BIS/BAS) Gambling Negative affect Young adults
The authors wish to thank Dr. Robert Roberts of the University of Texas School of Public Health and Dr. Mark Williams of Florida International University for their helpful comments during the preparation of this manuscript.
- Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1991). Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: Psychometric implications. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 316–336.Google Scholar
- Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian Problem Gambling Index: Final report. Ottawa: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.Google Scholar
- Gamblers Anonymous International Service Organization. (2010). Gamblers anonymous. Los Angeles: Gamblers Anonymous International Service Organization.Google Scholar
- Gray, J. A. (1987). The psychology of fear and stress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Johnson, S. L., Turner, R. J., & Iwata, N. (2003). BIS/BAS levels and psychiatric disorder: An epidemiological study. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 25(1), 25–36.Google Scholar
- Quilty, L. C., Watson, C., Robinson, J. J., Toneatto, T., & Bagby, R. M. (2010). The prevalence and course of pathological gambling in the mood disorders. Journal of Gambling Studies, 27, 191–201.Google Scholar
- Ross, D., Sharp, C., Vuchinich, R., & Spurrett, D. (2008). Midbrain mutiny: The picoeconomics and neuroeconomics of disordered gambling: Economic theory and cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Sharp, C., Steinberg, L., Yaroslavsky, I., Hofmeyr, A., Dellis, A., Ross, D., et al. (2011). An item response theory analysis of the problem gambling severity index in a national representative sample. Assessment. doi:10.1177/1073191111418296.
- Volberg, R. A. (2003). Why pay attention to adolescent gambling? In D. Romer (Ed.), Reducing adolescent risk: Toward an integrated approach. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Wynne, H. J. (2003). Introducing the Canadian Problem Gambling Index. Edmonton: Wynne Associates.Google Scholar