Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 575–586 | Cite as

Gambling on the Lottery: Sociodemographic Correlates Across the Lifespan

  • Grace M. BarnesEmail author
  • John W. Welte
  • Marie-Cecile O. Tidwell
  • Joseph H. Hoffman
Original Paper


Two representative U.S. telephone surveys of gambling were conducted—an adult survey of adults aged 18 years and older (n = 2,631) and a youth survey of young people aged 14–21 years old (n = 2,274). Because the questions and methods were the same or similar in both surveys, the data from these two surveys were combined into a single dataset to examine the prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of gambling and problem gambling across the lifespan. The present work focused specifically on gambling on the lottery which is the most prevalent form of gambling in the U.S. The frequency of gambling on the lottery increased sharply from mid adolescence to age 18 which is the legal age to purchase lottery tickets in most states; lottery play continued to increase into the thirties when it leveled off and remained high through the sixties and then decreased among those 70 years and older. Considering multiple sociodemographic factors together in a negative binomial regression, the average number of days of lottery gambling was significantly predicted by male gender, age, neighborhood disadvantage and whether or not lottery was legal in the state where the respondent lived. These findings can be used to inform policies regarding lotteries in the U.S.


Gambling Lottery Youth Adults Lifespan 



This work was funded by grant R01MH63761 from the National Institute on Mental Health and grant R01AA11402 from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.


  1. Barnes, G. M., Welte, J. W., Hoffman, J. H., & Tidwell, M.-C. O. (2009). Gambling, alcohol and other substance use among youth in the US. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 70, 134–142.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Boardman, J. D., Finch, B. K., Ellison, C. G., Williams, D. R., & Jackson, J. S. (2001). Neighborhood disadvantage, stress, and drug use among adults. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 42, 151–165.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clotfelter, C. T., & Cook, P. J. (1991). Selling hope: State lotteries in America (First Harvard University Press paperback edition). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Coxe, S., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2009). The analysis of count data: A gentle introduction to Poisson regression and its alternatives. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 121–136.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Elliott, D. S., Huizinga, D., & Ageton, S. S. (1985). Explaining delinquency and drug use. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Felsher, J. R., Derevensky, J. L., & Gupta, R. (2003). Parental influences and social modeling of youth lottery participation. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 13, 361–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Felsher, J. R., Derevensky, J. L., & Gupta, R. (2004). Lottery playing amongst youth: Implications for prevention and social policy. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20, 127–153.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Freund, E. A., & Morris, I. L. (2005). The lottery and income inequality in the States. Social Science Quarterly, 86, 996–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grun, L., & McKeigue, P. (2000). Prevalence of excessive gambling before and after introduction of a national lottery in the United Kingdom: Another example of the single distribution theory. Addiction, 95, 959–966.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Haisley, E., Mostafa, R., & Loewenstein, G. (2008). Subjective relative income and lottery ticket purchases. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21, 283–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hauser, R. M., & Warren, J. R. (1997). Socioeconomic indexes for occupations: A review, update, and critique. Sociological Methodology, 27, 177–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M. R. (Eds.). (1994). The generality of deviance. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Hutson, W. (2008, December 24). Blacks contribute heavily to lottery sales. Chicago, IL: Chicago Defender. Internet access on November 30, 2010,
  14. Kearney, M. S. (2005). State lotteries and consumer behavior. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 2269–2299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lang, K. B., & Omori, M. (2009). Can demographic variables predict lottery and pari- mutuel losses? An empirical investigation. Journal of Gambling Studies, 25, 171–183.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. New York State Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services. (2009). New York State youth development survey. Albany, NY: New York State Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services.Google Scholar
  17. Pickernell, D., Brown, K., Worthington, A., & Crawford, M. (2004). Gambling as a base for hypothecated taxation: The UK’s national lottery and electronic gambling machines in Australia. Public Money and Management, June, 167–174.Google Scholar
  18. Popova, S., Giesbrecht, N., Bekmuradov, D., & Patra, J. (2009). Hours and days of sale and density of alcohol outlets: Impacts on alcohol consumption and damage: A systematic review. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 44, 500–516.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rubenstein, R., & Scafidi, B. (2002). Who pays and who benefits? Examining the distributional consequences of the Georgia lottery for education. National Tax Journal, 60, 223–238.Google Scholar
  20. SPSS Inc. (2008). SPSS advanced statistics 17.0. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.Google Scholar
  21. Stricker, L. J. (1988). Measuring social status with occupational information: A simple method. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 423–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2007). Results from the 2006 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National findings (Office of Applied Studies, NSDUH Series H-32, DHHS Publication No. SMA 07-4293). Rockville, MD.Google Scholar
  23. U.S. Census Bureau. (2009, November 24). Income and Apportionment of State-administered lottery funds: 2008. Internet access on March 22, 2010,
  24. Welte, J. W., Barnes, G. M., Tidwell, M.-C. O., & Hoffman, J. H. (2008). The prevalence of problem gambling among U.S. adolescents and young adults: Results from a national survey. Journal of Gambling Studies, 24, 119–133.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Welte, J. W., Barnes, G. M., Tidwell, M.-C. O., & Hoffman, J. H. (2009). The association of form of gambling with problem gambling among American youth. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 23, 105–112.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Welte, J. W., Barnes, G. M., Wieczorek, W. F., Tidwell, M.-C. O., & Parker, J. (2001). Alcohol and gambling pathology among U.S. adults: Prevalence, demographic patterns and co-morbidity. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 62, 706–712.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Welte, J. W., Barnes, G. M., Wieczorek, W. F., Tidwell, M.-C., & Parker, J. (2002). Gambling participation in the U.S.–Results from a National Survey. Journal of Gambling Studies, 18, 313–337.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Welte, J. W., Barnes, G. M., Wieczorek, W. F., Tidwell, M.-C. O., & Parker, J. (2004). Risk factors for pathological gambling. Addictive Behaviors, 29, 323–335.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wood, R. T. A., & Griffiths, M. D. (2004). Adolescent lottery and scratchcard players: Do their attitudes influence their gambling behaviour? Journal of Adolescence, 27, 467–475.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Grace M. Barnes
    • 1
    Email author
  • John W. Welte
    • 1
  • Marie-Cecile O. Tidwell
    • 1
  • Joseph H. Hoffman
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Institute on AddictionsUniversity at Buffalo, The State University of New YorkBuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations