Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 453–466 | Cite as

Psychometric Evaluation of the Problem Gambling Severity Index-Chinese Version (PGSI-C)

  • Jasmine M. Y. Loo
  • Tian P. S. Oei
  • Namrata Raylu
Original Paper

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Chinese 9-item Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) derived from the 31-item Canadian Problem Gambling Index (CPGI) originally developed by Ferris and Wynne (2001). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA; n = 386; Group A data) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA; n = 387; Group B data) on the Chinese student and community data (Mean age = 25.36 years) showed that a unifactorial model fitted the data with good reliability score (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.77). The concurrent validity of the PGSI-C was good in terms of the Chinese data matching the expected correlation between PGSI-C and other variables or scales such as SOGS, gambling frequency, gambling urge, gambling cognitions, depression, anxiety, and stress. The scale also reported good discriminant and predictive validity. In sum, the PGSI-C has good psychometric properties and can be used among Chinese communities to identify at-risk problem gamblers. Implications and suggestions for future research are discussed.

Keywords

CPGI Canadian problem gambling index Chinese Gambling Problem gambling severity index PGSI Psychometric Scale 

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV-TR (4th, text revision edn.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  2. Antony, M. M., Bieling, P. J., Cox, B. J., Enns, M. W., & Swinson, R. P. (1998). Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales in clinical groups and a community sample. Psychological Assessment, 10(2), 176–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arthur, D., Tong, W. L., Chen, C. P., Hing, A. Y., Sagara-Rosemeyer, M., Kua, E. H., et al. (2008). The validity and reliability of four measures of gambling behaviour in a sample of Singapore university students. Journal of Gambling Studies, 24(4), 451–462.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blaszczynski, A., Huynh, S., Dumlao, V. J., & Farrell, E. (1998). Problem gambling within a Chinese speaking community. Journal of Gambling Studies, 14(4), 359–380.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blunch, N. L. (2008). Introduction to structural equation modelling using SPSS and AMOS. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Bolen, D. W., & Boyd, W. H. (1968). Gambling and the gambler: A review and preliminary findings. Archives of General Psychiatry, 18(5), 617–629.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Brace, N., Kemp, R., & Snelgar, R. (2009). SPSS for psychologists. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Brooker, I. S., Clara, I. P., & Cox, B. J. (2009). The Canadian Problem Gambling Index: Factor structure and associations with psychopathology in a nationally representative sample. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 41(2), 109–114.Google Scholar
  9. Chen, C. N., Wong, J., Lee, N., Chan-Ho, M. W., Lau, J. T. F., & Fung, M. (1993). The Shatin community mental health survey in Hong Kong: II Major findings. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50(2), 125–133.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Clarke, D., Abbott, M., Tse, S., Townsend, S., Kingi, P., & Manaia, W. (2006). Gender, age, ethnic and occupational associations with pathological gambling in a New Zealand urban sample. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 35(2), 84–91.Google Scholar
  11. Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index: Final report. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.Google Scholar
  12. Field, A. (2000). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Fong, D. K., & Ozorio, B. (2005). Gambling participation and prevalence estimates of pathological gambling in a far-east city: Macao. UNLV Gaming Research & Review Journal, 9, 15–28.Google Scholar
  15. Hobson, J. S. P. (1995). Macao: Gambling on its future. Tourism Management, 16(3), 237–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Illinois Institute for Addiction Recovery. (2007). Addiction information. Retrieved from http://www.addictionrecov.org/aboutgam.htm.
  17. Kline, P. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Lai, D. W. L. (2006). Gambling and the older Chinese in Canada. Journal of Gambling Studies, 22(1), 121–141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144(9), 1184–1188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Loo, J. M. Y., Raylu, N., & Oei, T. P. S. (2008). Gambling among the Chinese: A comprehensive review. Clinical Psychology Review, 28(7), 1152–1166.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lovibond, P. F., & Lovibond, S. H. (1995). The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33(3), 335–343.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McMillen, J., Marshall, D., Ahmed, E., & Wenzel, M. (2004). 2003 Victorian longitudinal community attitudes survey. Canberra, Australia: The Centre for Gambling Research, Australian National University.Google Scholar
  23. McMillen, J., & Wenzel, M. (2006). Measuring problem gambling: Assessment of three prevalence screens. International Gambling Studies, 6(2), 147–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Neal, P., Delfabbro, P. H., & O’Neill, M. (2004). Problem gambling and harm: Towards a national definition. Melbourne: National Gambling Research Program Working Party.Google Scholar
  25. Norton, P. J. (2007). Depression Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS-21): Psychometric analysis across four racial groups. Anxiety, Stress & Coping: An International Journal, 20(3), 253–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Oei, T. P. S., Lin, J., & Raylu, N. (2007a). Validation of the Chinese version of the Gambling Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS-C). Journal of Gambling Studies, 23, 309–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Oei, T. P. S., Lin, J., & Raylu, N. (2007b). Validation of the Chinese version of the Gambling Urges Scale (GUS-C). International Gambling Studies, 7, 101–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Oei, T. P. S., Lin, J., & Raylu, N. (2008). The relationship between gambling cognitions, psychological states, and gambling: A cross-cultural study of Chinese and Caucasians in Australia. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(2), 147–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Parker, G., Gladstone, G., & Chee, K. T. (2001). Depression in the planet’s largest ethnic group: The Chinese. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158(6), 857–864.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Petry, N. M. (2005a). Pathological gambling: Etiology, comorbidity, and treatment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Petry, N. M. (2005b). Prevention: Focus on gambling in youth and young adults. In N. M. Petry (Ed.), Pathological gambling: Etiology, comorbidity, and treatment (pp. 269–278). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Queensland Treasury. (2006). Queensland household gambling survey 2003–04. Brisbane: Queensland Government.Google Scholar
  33. Raylu, N., & Oei, T. P. S. (2002). Pathological gambling: A comprehensive review. Clinical Psychology Review, 22(7), 1009–1061.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Raylu, N., & Oei, T. P. S. (2004). Role of culture in gambling and problem gambling. Clinical Psychology Review, 23(8), 1087–1114.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rosenthal, R. J. (2003). Distribution of the DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling. Addiction, 98(12), 1674–1675.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Roy Morgan Research. (2006). The fourth study into the extent and impact of gambling in Tasmania with particular reference to problem gambling: Follow-up to the studies conducted in 1994, 1996, and 2000. Hobart, Tasmania: Gambling Support Bureau, Department of Health and Services.Google Scholar
  37. Shaffer, H. J., & Hall, M. N. (1996). Estimating the prevalence of adolescent gambling disorders: A quantitative synthesis and guide toward standard gambling nomenclature. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12(2), 193–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stinchfield, R. (2002). Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS). Addictive Behaviors, 27(1), 1–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
  40. Tang, C. S., Wu, A. M. S., & Tang, J. Y. C. (2007). Gender differences in characteristics of Chinese treatment-seeking problem gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23(2), 145–156.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tang, C. S., Wu, A. M. S., Tang, J. Y. C., & Yan, E. C. W. (2010). Reliability, validity, and cut scores of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS) for Chinese. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26(1), 145–158.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tseng, W. S., Lin, T. Y., & Yeh, E. K. (1995). Chinese societies and mental health. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Victorian Casino and Gaming Authority. (2000). The impact of gaming on specific cultural groups report. Melbourne, Victoria.Google Scholar
  44. Vong, F. (2007). The psychology of risk-taking in gambling among Chinese visitors to Macau. International Gambling Studies, 7(1), 29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wenzel, M., McMillen, J., Marshall, D., & Ahmed, E. (2004). Validation of the Victorian gambling screen. Melbourne: Centre for Gambling Research (CGR), ANU.Google Scholar
  46. Wong, I. L. K., & So, E. M. T. (2003). Prevalence estimates of problem and pathological gambling in Hong Kong. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160(7), 1353–1354.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Young, M., & Stevens, M. (2008). SOGS and CGPI: Parallel comparison on a diverse population. Journal of Gambling Studies, 24(3), 337–356.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jasmine M. Y. Loo
    • 1
  • Tian P. S. Oei
    • 1
  • Namrata Raylu
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Psychology, The University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations