Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 189–204 | Cite as

Prevalence of Adolescent Problem Gambling, Related Harms and Help-Seeking Behaviours Among an Australian Population

  • Katie SplevinsEmail author
  • Shab Mireskandari
  • Kymbra Clayton
  • Alex Blaszczynski
Original Paper


Epidemiological studies have consistently reported prevalence rates ranging between 0.9 and 23.5% for problem gambling among young people. With such a large range reported in the literature, it is clear that more research in this area would be of value. The current study investigated the prevalence rate of adolescent gambling and problem gambling and explored types of harm-related and help-seeking behaviours associated with gambling specific to this population in an Australian setting. A self-administered battery of questionnaires was distributed to 252 students aged 12–18 years, attending four private schools in the Eastern suburbs of Sydney, Australia. The battery included a self-administered socio-gambling demographic questionnaire, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Fourth Edition Multiple Response Juvenile (DSM-IV-MR-J) diagnostic instrument to assess problem gambling status, the Gambling Attitudes Scale, and questionnaires using a Likert scale to measure gambling-related harms and help-seeking behaviours. The prevalence rate among this group was found to be 6.7%. The study found further support for previous findings suggesting that a significant proportion of young people meet criteria for problem gambling, that males are at-risk and that few adolescents are able to recognise when gambling is problematic or access mental health professionals for assistance.


Adolescent Gambling Prevalence Problem gambling Risk-taking 



The authors would like to thank Star City Casino for funding this research and Waverley Action for Youth Services (WAYS) for resources and access to schools in the Eastern suburbs of Sydney. Thanks to Dr Terri Said and Claire McGuire for their administrative support and most importantly to the schools and students who agreed to take part in this study.


  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistic manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundation of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Browne, B. A., & Brown, D. J. (1994). Predictors of lottery gambling among American college students. Journal of Social Psychology, 134, 339–349.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Delfabbro, P., Lahn, J., & Grabosky, P. (2005). Adolescent gambling in the ACT. Report to the ACT Gambling and Racing Commission. Retrieved 1 May, 2009, from .
  5. Delfabbro, P., & Thrupp, L. (2003). The social determinants of youth gambling in South Australian adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 26, 313–330.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Derevensky, J. L., & Gupta, R. (2000). Prevalence estimates of adolescent gambling: A comparison of the SOGS-RA, DSM-IV-J, and the GA 20 Questions. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16, 227–251.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Derevensky, J. L., Gupta, R., & Della Cioppa, G. (1996). A developmental perspective of gambling behavior in children and adolescents. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12, 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Evans, L., & Delfabbro, P. H. (2005). Motivators for change and barriers to help-seeking in Australian problem gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 21, 133–155.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Fisher, S. (1992). Measuring pathological gambling in children: The case of fruit machines in the UK. Journal of Gambling Studies, 8, 263–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fisher, S. (1993). Gambling and pathological gambling in adolescents. Journal of Gambling Studies, 9, 277–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fisher, S. (1999). A prevalence study of gambling and problem gambling in British adolescents. Addiction Research, 7, 509–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fisher, S. (2000). Developing the DSM-IV-DSM-IV criteria to identify adolescent problem gambling in non-clinical populations. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16, 253–273.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Griffiths, M. (2002). Why don’t adolescent problem gamblers seek treatment? The Electronic Journal of Gambling Studies, 5, 1–9.Google Scholar
  14. Griffiths, M. D., & Wood, R. T. A. (1999). Lottery gambling and addiction: An overview of European research. Retrieved 24 May, 2009, from
  15. Gupta, R., & Derevensky, J. (1997). Familial and social influences on juvenile gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 13, 179–192.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gupta, R., & Derevensky, J. (1998a). Adolescent gambling behavior: A prevalence study and examination of the correlates associated with problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 14, 319–345.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gupta, R., & Derevensky, J. (1998b). An empirical examination of Jacob’s general theory of addictions: Do adolescent gamblers fit the theory? Journal of Gambling Studies, 14, 17–49.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gupta, R., & Derevensky, J. L. (2000). Adolescents with gambling problems: From research to treatment. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16, 315–342.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hanson, M., & Rossow, I. (2008). Adolescent gambling and problem gambling: Does the total consumption model apply? Journal of Gambling Studies, 24, 135–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hardoon, K., & Derevensky, J. L. (2001). Social influences involved in children’s gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 17, 191–215.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hardoon, K., Derevensky, J. L., & Gupta, R. (2003). Empirical measures vs. perceived gambling severity among youth: Why adolescent problem gamblers fail to seek treatment. Addictive Behaviors, 28, 933–946.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Jackson, A. (1999). The impacts of gambling on adolescents and children. Department of Human Services, Victoria, School of Social Work, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  23. Jacobs, D. F. (1986). A general theory of addictions: A new theoretical model. Journal of Gambling Behavior, 2, 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ladouceur, R., Blaszczynski, A., & Pelletier, A. (2004a). Why adolescent problem gamblers do not seek treatment? Journal of Child and Adolescent Substance Abuse, 13, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ladouceur, R., Dube, D., & Bujold, A. (1994). Prevalence of pathological gambling and related problems among college students in the Quebec Metropolitan Area. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 39, 289–293.Google Scholar
  26. Ladouceur, R., Ferland, F., Cote, M. A., & Vitaro, F. (2004b). Teacher’s knowledge and training needs regarding youth gambling. School of Psychology International Journal, 25, 472–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ladouceur, R., Ferland, F., Poulin, C., Vitaro, F., & Wiebe, J. (2005). Concordance between the SOGS-RS and the DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling among youth. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 19, 271–276.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (The SOGS). A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1184–1188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Magoon, M. E., & Ingersoll, G. M. (2006). Parental modeling, attachment and supervision as moderators of adolescent gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 22, 1–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Messerlian, C., Gillespie, M., & Deverensky, J. L. (2007). Beyond drugs and alcohol: Including gambling in a high risk behavioural framework. Paediatrics and Child Health, 12, 199–204.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Molde, H., Pallesen, S., Bartone, P., Hystad, S., & Johnsen, B. H. (2009). Prevalence and correlates of gambling among 16–19 year old adolescents in Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50, 55–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Moore, S. M., & Ohtsuka, K. (1997). Gambling activities of young Australians: Developing a model of behaviour. Journal of Gambling Studies, 13, 207–236.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Moore, S. M., & Ohtsuka, K. (1999). Beliefs about control over gambling among young people, and their relation to problem gambling. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 13, 339–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. National Research Council. (1999). Pathological gambling: A critical review. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  35. Petry, N. M. (2005). Pathological gambling: Etiology, comorbidity & treatment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Productivity Commission. (1999). The Productivity Commission’s gambling inquiry: 3 years on. Retrieved 20 May, 2009, from .
  37. Shaffer, H. J., & Hall, M. N. (1996). Estimating the prevalence of adolescent gambling disorders: A quantitative synthesis and guide toward standard gambling nomenclature. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12, 193–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shaffer, H. J., LaBrie, R., Scanlan, K. M., & Cummings, T. N. (1994). Pathological gambling among adolescents: Massachusetts Gambling Screen (MAGS). Journal of Gambling Studies, 10, 339–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sullivan, S. (2001). Gambling by young people in New Zealand high schools. Paper presented at the gambling: Understanding and minimising harm, an international overview conference. Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  40. Volberg, R. A., & Moore, L. W. (1999). Gambling and problem gambling among adolescents in Washington State: A Replication Study 1993–1999. WA: Washington State Lottery.Google Scholar
  41. Wood, R. T. A., & Griffiths, M. D. (1998). The acquisition, development and maintenance of lottery and scratchcard gambling in adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 21, 265–273.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Yeoman, T., & Griffiths, M. D. (1996). Adolescent machine gambling and crime. Journal of Adolescence, 19, 99–104.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katie Splevins
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Shab Mireskandari
    • 3
  • Kymbra Clayton
    • 4
  • Alex Blaszczynski
    • 5
  1. 1.Waverley Action for Youth Services (WAYS)Bondi JunctionAustralia
  2. 2.YorkUK
  3. 3.Psychosocial Research Group, Department of Medical OncologyPrince of Wales Hospital, RandwickSydneyAustralia
  4. 4.Psychology DepartmentMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia
  5. 5.Gambling Research Unit, School of Psychology (A18)The University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations