Advertisement

Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 135–149 | Cite as

Adolescent Gambling and Problem Gambling: Does the Total Consumption Model Apply?

  • Marianne Hansen
  • Ingeborg Rossow
Original Paper

Abstract

This study describes the extent and distribution of gambling among Norwegian adolescents. The study assesses whether gambling frequency and expenditures and prevalence of problem gambling are associated both at the individual and aggregate (school) level, and in particular whether the total consumption model applies to gambling behaviour. Data comprised a national representative sample of 11,637 13- to 19-year-old students in 73 schools (response rate 92.3%). The Lie/Bet Questionnaire and an additional DSM-criterion on chasing the losses were applied to assess problem gambling. A majority (78.5%) had gambled during the last year and 3.1% met all three criteria for problem gambling. Gambling frequency and expenditures were much higher among problem gamblers and increased proportionally with the degree of problem gambling. The 6.1% who scored on both Lie/Bet items accounted for 59% of all gambling expenditures on slot machines. Positive and significant correlations between various indicators of problem gambling and the overall amount of gambling at the aggregate (school) level imply that the higher the overall amount of gambling and gambling expenditures are, the higher the prevalence of problem gambling, which indicates that the total consumption model also applies to gambling behaviour among adolescents.

Keywords

Adolescent gambling Lie/Bet questionnaire Prevalence Expenditures Frequency Total consumption model 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Norwegian Social Research (NOVA) has provided the dataset Young in Norway 2002 in which the analysis are based. The data collection was financed by The Research Council of Norway.

References

  1. Abbott, M. (2005). Commentaries. Addiction, 100, 1226–1239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abbott, M. W. (2006). Do EGMs and problem gambling go together like a horse and carriage? Gambling Research, 18(1), 7–38.Google Scholar
  3. Australian Productivity Commission (APC) (1999). Australias gambling industries. Report no. 10. Canberra: Ausinfo.Google Scholar
  4. Blaszczynski, A. (2005). Commentaries. Addiction, 100, 1226–1239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Derevensky, J. L., & Gupta, R. (2000a). Youth gambling: A clinical and research perspective. E-Gambling: The Electronic Journal of Gambling Issue, 2, 1–10.Google Scholar
  6. Derevensky, J. L., & Gupta, R. (2000b). Prevalence estimates of adolescent gambling: A comparison of the SOGS-RA, DSM-IV-J, and the G.A. 20 Questions. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16(2/3), 227–251.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Derevensky, J., Gupta, R., & Winters, K. (2003). Prevalence rates of youth gambling problems: Are the current rates inflated? Journal of Gambling Studies, 19(4), 405–425.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fisher, S. (1999). A prevalence study of gambling and problem gambling in British adolescents. Addiction Research, 7(6), 509–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gerstein, D., Hoffman, J., Larison, C., Engelman, L., Murphy, S., Palmer, A., Chuchro, L., Toce, M., Johnson, R., Buie, T., & Hill, M. A. (1999). Gambling impact and behaviour study, report to the national gambling impact study commission. Chicago: National Opinion Research Centre at the University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  10. Griffiths, M. D. (1990). The acquisition, development, and maintenance of fruit machine gambling in adolescents. Journal of Gambling Studies, 6, 193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Griffiths, M. D. (1995). Adolescent gambling. London: Routlegde.Google Scholar
  12. Grun, L., & McKeigue, P. (2000). Prevalence of excessive gambling before and after introduction of a national lottery in the United Kingdom: Another example of the single distribution theory. Addiction, 95(6), 959–966.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gupta, R., & Derevensky, J. L. (1998). Adolescent gambling behaviour: A prevalence study and examination of the correlates associated with problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 14, 319–343.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gupta, R., & Derevensky, J. L. (2001). An examination of the differential coping styles of adolescents with gambling problems. Ontario: Report to the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care.Google Scholar
  15. Götestam, K. G., Johansson, A., Wenzel, H. G., & Simonsen, I. E. (2004). Validation of the Lie/Bet screen for pathological gambling on two normal population data sets. Psychological Reports, 95, 1009–1013.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hardoon, K. K., & Derevensky, J. L. (2001). Social influences involved in children’s gambling behaviour. Journal of Gambling Studies, 17(3), 191–215.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hibell, B., Andersson, B., Ahlström, S., Balakireva, O., Bjanrason, T., Kokkevi, A., & Morgan, M. (2000). The 1999 ESPAD report. Alcohol and other drug use among students in 30 European countries. The Swedish Council for Information on alcohol and Other Drugs. Google Scholar
  18. Jacobs D. F. (1989). A general theory of addictions: Rationale for and evidence supporting a new approach for understanding and treating addictive behaviours. In T. N. Cummings (Ed.), Compulsive Gambling: Theory, research & practice. Lexington: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  19. Jacobs, D. F. (2000). Juvenile gambling in North America: An analysis of long term trends and future prospects. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16(2/3), 119–152.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jacques, C., Ladouceur, R., & Ferland, F. (2000). Impact of availability on gambling: A longitudinal study. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 45, 810–815.Google Scholar
  21. Johnson, E. E., Hamer, R. M., & Nora, R. M. (1988). The Lie/Bet questionnaire for screening pathological gamblers: A follow-up study. Psychological Reports, 83(3 Part 2), 1219–1224.Google Scholar
  22. Johnson, E. E., Hamer, R., Nora, R. M., & Tan, R. (1997) The Lie/Bet questionnaire for screening pathological gamblers. Psychological Reports, 80(1), 83–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ladouceur R., Boudreault N., Jacques C., & Vitaro, F. (1999). Pathological gambling and related problems among adolescents. Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse, 8(4), 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ladouceur, R., Dubè, D., & Bujold, A. (1994). Prevalence of pathological gamblers an related problems among college students in the Quebec metropolitan area. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 39, 289–293.Google Scholar
  25. Lemmens, P. (1991). Measurement and distribution of alcohol consumption. Dissertation, Maastrict Netherlands.Google Scholar
  26. Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). The South Oaks gambling screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1184–1188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lund, I., & Nordlund, S. (2003). Pengespill og pengespillproblemer I Norge. Rapport nr. 2/2003, SIRUS.Google Scholar
  28. Mäkela, P. (2002). Whose drinking does the liberalization of alcohol policy increase? Change in alcohol consumption by the initial level in the Finnish panel survey in 1968 and 1969. Addiction, 97, 701–706.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. National Research Council (1999). Pathological gambling: A critical review. Washington DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  30. O’Connor, J., & Dickerson, M. (2003). Definition and measurement of chasing in off-course betting and gaming machine play. Journal of Gambling Studies, 19(4), 359–386.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Orford, J. F. (2003). Why the British government is wrong to continue to allow juvenile gaming machine playing. Addiction Research and Theory, 11(6), 375–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Orford, J. F. (2005a). Disabling the public interest: Gambling strategies and policies for Britain. Addiction, 100, 1219–1225.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Orford, J. F. (2005b). Commentaries. Addiction, 100, 1226–1239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Raylu, N., & Oei, T. P. S. (2002). Pathological gambling—a comprehensive review. Child Psychology Review, 22, 1009–1061.Google Scholar
  35. Room, R., Turner, N. E., & Ialomiteanu, A. (1999). Community effects of the opening of the Niagara casino. Addiction, 94(10), 1449–1466.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rose, G. (2001). Sick individuals and sick populations. International Journal of Epidemiology, 30, 427–432.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rose, G., & Day, S. (1990). The population mean predicts the number of deviant individuals. British Medical Journal, 301, 1031–1034.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Rossow, I. M., & Bø, A. K. (2003). Metoderapport for datainnsamlingen til Ung i Norge 2002. NOVA, Oslo.Google Scholar
  39. Rossow, I., Grøholt, B., & Wichstrøm, L. (2005). Intoxicants and suicidal behavior among adolescents: Changes in levels and associations from 1992 to 2002. Addiction, 100, 79–88.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rossow, I., & Molde, H. (2006). Chasing the criteria: Comparing SOGS-RA and the Lie/Bet screen to assess prevalence of problem gambling and ‘at-risk’ gambling among adolescents. E-Gambling: The Electronic Journal of Gambling Issue, 18, 57–71.Google Scholar
  41. Shaffer, H. J. (2005). Commentaries. Addiction, 100, 1226–1239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shaffer, H. J., & Hall, M. N. (1996). Estimating the prevalence of adolescent gambling disorders: A quantitative synthesis and guide toward standard gambling nomenclature. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12, 193–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shaffer, H. J., & Hall, M. N. (2001). Updating and refining prevalence estimates of disordered gambling behaviour in the United States and Canada. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 92(3), 168–172.Google Scholar
  44. Shaffer, H. J., Hall, M. N., & VanderBilt, J. (1999). Estimating the prevalence of disordered gambling behaviour in the United States and Canada: A research synthesis. American Journal of Public Health, 89(9), 1369–1376.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shaffer, H. J., LaBrie, R. A. & LaPlante, D. (2004). Laying the foundation for quantifying regional exposure to social phenomena: Considering the case of legalized gambling as a public health toxin. Psychology of Addictive Behavior, 18(1), 40–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Skog, O. J. (1979). Modeller for drikkeatferd (Models for drinking behaviour). Oslo: National Institute for Alcohol Research.Google Scholar
  47. Skog, O. J. (1985). Distribution of alcohol consumption, Part III: Evidence of a collective drinking culture. SIFA Mimeograph.Google Scholar
  48. Skog, O. J., & Rossow, I. (2006). Flux and stability: Individual fluctuations, regression towards the mean and collective changes in alcohol consumption. Addiction, 101, 959–970.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stinchfield, R., Cassuto, N., Winters, K., & Latimer, W. (1997). Prevalence of gambling among Minnesota Public School students in 1992 and 1995. Journal of Gambling Studies, 13, 25–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. The Norwegian Gaming and Foundation Authority (2006a). Gaming in Norway 2005. Annual Statistic Report. http://www.lotteritilsynet.no
  51. The Norwegian Gaming and Foundation Authority (2006b). Årsmelding 2006. http://www.lottstift.no/dav/01c8632cf2.pdf
  52. The Norwegian Gaming and Foundation Authority (2003). Gaming in Norway 2002. Annual Statistic Report. http://www.lotteritilsynet.no
  53. Turner, N. E., Ialomiteanu, A., & Room, R. (1999). Chequered expectations: Predictors of approval of opening a casino in the Niagara community. Journal of Gambling Studies, 15, 45–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Volberg, R. (1993). Gambling and problem gambling among adolescents in Washington State. Report to Washington State Lottery.Google Scholar
  55. Volberg, R. A. (1994). The prevalence and demographics of pathological gamblers: Implications for public health. American Journal of Public Health, 84(2), 237–241.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Volberg, R. A. (1996). Gambling and problem gambling among adolescents in Georgia. Report to the Georgia Department of Human Resources.Google Scholar
  57. Volberg, R. A. (1998). Gambling and problem gambling among adolescents in New York. Report to the New York Council on Problem Gambling.Google Scholar
  58. Volberg, R. A., & Moore, L. (1999). Gambling and problem gambling among adolescents in Washington State: A replication study, 1993 to 1999. Report to the Washington State Lottery.Google Scholar
  59. Volberg, R. A. (2002). Gambling and problem gambling among adolescents in Nevada. Report to the Nevada Department of Human Resources.Google Scholar
  60. Wallish, L. (1993). Gambling in Texas: 1992 Texas survey of adolescent gambling behaviour. Report to the Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse.Google Scholar
  61. Welte, J. W., Wieczorek, W. F., Barnes, G. M., Tidwell, M. C., & Hoffman, J. H. (2004). The relationship of ecological and geographic factors to gambling behaviour and pathology. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20(4), 405–423.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Winters, K., Stinchfield, R., & Fulkerson, J. (1993). Toward the development of an adolescent gambling problem severity scale. Journal of Gambling Studies, 9, 371–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Williams, R. J., & Wood, R. T. (2004). The proportion of gaming revenue derived from problem gamblers: Examining the issues in a Canadian context. Analyses of Social Issues & Public Policy, 4(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Norwegian Institute for Alcohol and Drug ResearchOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations