Journal of Global Optimization

, Volume 58, Issue 4, pp 673–692 | Cite as

Second-order Karush–Kuhn–Tucker optimality conditions for set-valued optimization

Article

Abstract

In this paper, we propose the concept of a second-order composed contingent derivative for set-valued maps, discuss its relationship to the second-order contingent derivative and investigate some of its special properties. By virtue of the second-order composed contingent derivative, we extend the well-known Lagrange multiplier rule and the Kurcyusz–Robinson–Zowe regularity assumption to a constrained set-valued optimization problem in the second-order case. Simultaneously, we also establish some second-order Karush–Kuhn–Tucker necessary and sufficient optimality conditions for a set-valued optimization problem, whose feasible set is determined by a set-valued map, under a generalized second-order Kurcyusz–Robinson–Zowe regularity assumption.

Keywords

Set-valued optimization Second-order composed contingent derivative Lagrange multiplier rule Karush–Kuhn–Tucker condition Regularity assumption Optimality conditions 

Mathematics Subject Classification (2010)

49J53 49K30 90C29 90C46 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant numbers: 11171362 and 11201509) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant number: CDJXS12100021). The authors are grateful to the two anonymous referees for their valuable comments and suggestions, which helped to improve the paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Aubin, J.P.: Contingent derivatives of set-valued maps and existence of solutions to nonlinear inclusions and differential inclusions. In: Nachbin, L. (ed.) Mathematics Analysis and Applications, part A, pp. 160–229. Academic Press, New York (1981)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aubin, J.P., Ekeland, I.: Applied Nonlinear Analysis. Wiley, New York (1984)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aubin, J.P., Frankowska, H.: Set-Valued Analysis. Birkhäuser, Boston (1990)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bonnans, J.F., Shapiro, A.: Perturbation Analysis of Optimization Problem. Springer, New York (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen, C.R., Li, S.J., Teo, K.L.: Higher-order weak epiderivatives and applications to duality and optimality conditions. Comput. Math. Appl. 57, 1389–1399 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen, G.Y., Jahn, J.: Optimality conditions for set-valued optimization problems. Math. Methods Oper. Res. 48, 187–200 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Corley, H.W.: Optimality conditions for maximizations of set-valued functions. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 58, 1–10 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Götz, A., Jahn, J.: The Lagrange multiplier rule in set-valued optimization. SIAM J. Optim. 10, 331–344 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gutiérrez, C., Jiménez, B., Novo, V.: New second-order directional derivative and optimality conditions in scalar and vector optimization. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 142, 85–106 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jahn, J.: Introduction to the Theory of Nonlinear Optimization, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jahn, J.: Vector Optimization: Theory, Applications, and Extensions. Springer, Berlin (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jahn, J., Khan, A.A.: Generalized contingent epiderivatives in set-valued optimization: optimality conditions. Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim. 23, 807–831 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jahn, J., Khan, A.A., Zeilinger, P.: Second-order optimality conditions in set optimization. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 125, 331–347 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jahn, J., Rauh, R.: Contingent epiderivatives and set-valued optimization. Math. Methods Oper. Res. 46, 193–211 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jiménez, B., Novo, V.: Optimality conditions in differentiable vector optimization via second-order tangent sets. Appl. Math. Optim. 49, 123–144 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Li, S.J., Chen, C.R.: Higher-order optimality conditions for Henig efficient solutions in set-valued optimization. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 323, 1184–1200 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Li, S.J., Teo, K.L., Yang, X.Q.: Higher-order optimality conditions for set-valued optimization. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 137, 533–553 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Li, S.J., Zhu, S.K., Teo, K.L.: New generalized second-order contingent epiderivatives and set-valued optimization problems. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 152, 587–604 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Luc, D.T.: Contingent derivatives of set-valued maps and applications to vector optimization. Math. Program. 50, 99–111 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Penot, J.P.: Second-order conditions for optimization problems with constraints. SIAM J. Control Optim. 37, 303–318 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhu, S.K., Li, S.J.: New second-order contingent epiderivatives and set-valued optimization problems. Acta Mathematicae Applicatae Sinica, English Series (accepted for publication)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Mathematics and StatisticsChongqing UniversityChongqingChina
  2. 2.Mathematical Sciences Research Institute in ChongqingChongqing UniversityChongqingChina
  3. 3.Department of Mathematics and StatisticsCurtin University of TechnologyPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations