Levitin–Polyak well-posedness of variational inequality problems with functional constraints

Article

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce several types of (generalized) Levitin–Polyak well-posednesses for a variational inequality problem with abstract and functional constraints. Criteria and characterizations for these types of well-posednesses are given. Relations among these types of well-posednesses are also investigated.

Keywords

Constrained variational inequality Approximating solution sequence (generalized) Levitin–Polyak well-posedness Monotone operator Coercivity 

References

  1. 1.
    Auslender A.: Optimization: Methodes Numeriques. Masson, Paris (1976)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Auslender A.: Asymptotic analysis for penalty and barrier methods in variational inequalities. SIAM J. Control Optim. 37, 653–671 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Auslender A.: Variational inequalities over the cone of semidefinite positive symmetric matrices and over the Lorentz cone, the Second Japanese-Sino Optimization Meeting, Part II, Kyoto, 2002. Optim. Methods Softw. 18, 359–376 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bednarczuk E.: Well-posedness of Vector Optimization Problems. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol. 294, pp. 51–61. Berlin, Springer-Verlag (1987)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bednarczuk E., Penot P.J.: Metrically well-set minimization problems. Appl. Math. Optim. 26, 273–285 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Beer G., Lucchetti R.: The epi-distance topology: continuity and stability results with application to convex optimization problems. Math. Oper. Res. 17, 715–726 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Deng S.: Coercivity properties and well-posedness in vector optimization. RAIRO Oper. Res. 37, 195–208 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dontchev A.L., Zolezzi T.: Well-posed Optimization Problems. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol.1543. Springer, Berlin (1993)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fukushima M.: Equivalent differentiable optimization problem and descent method for symmteric variational inequalities. Math. Program. 53, 99–110 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Furi M., Vignoli A.: About well-posed minimization problems for functionals in metric spaces. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 5, 225–229 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Harker P.T., Pang J.S.: Finite-dimensional variational inequality and nonlinear complementarity problems: a survey of theory, algorithms and applications. Math. Program. 48, 161–220 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    He B.S., Yang H., Zhang C.S.: A modified augmented Lagrangian method for a class of monotone variational inequalities. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 159, 35–51 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Huang X.X.: Extended well-posed properties of vector optimization problems. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 106, 165–182 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Huang X.X.: Extended and strongly extended well-posedness of set-valued optimization problems. Math. Methods Oper. Res. 53, 101–116 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Huang X.X., Yang X.Q.: Generalized Levitin–Polyak well-posedness in constrained optimization. SIAM J. Optim. 17, 243–258 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Huang, X.X., Yang, X.Q.: Levitin–Polyak well-posedness of constrained vector optimization problems. J. Glob. Optim. Published Online, 06 July (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Konsulova A.S., Revalski J.P.: Constrained convex optimization problems-well-posedness and stability. Num. Funct. Anal. Optim. 15, 889–907 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Levitin E.S., Polyak B.T.: Convergence of minimizing sequences in conditional extremum problems. Soviet Math. Dokl. 7, 764–767 (1966)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lignola M.B., Morgan J.: Approxiamte solutions and α-well-posedness for variational inequalities and Nash equilibria. In: Zaccour, G. (eds) Decision and control in management science, pp. 369–378. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2001)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lignola, M.B., Morgan, J.: α-well-posedness for Nash equilibria and for optimization with Nash equilibrium constraints. J. Glob. Optim. Published Online, 27 June (2006)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Loridan P.: Well-posed vector optimization, recent developments in well-posed variational problems, mathematics and its applications, vol. 331. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1995)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lucchetti, R.: Well-posedness towards vector optimization. Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems, vol. 294. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1987)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lucchetti, R., Revalski, J. (eds): Recent developments in well-posed variational problems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1995)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Margiocco M., Patrone F., Chicco P.: A new approach to Tikhonov well-posedness for Nash equilibria. Optimization 40, 385–400 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nguyen S., Dupuis C.: An efficient method for computing traffic equilibria in networks with asymmetric transportation costs. Transport. Sci. 18, 185–202 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Patrone, F.: Well-posedness for Nash equilibria and related topics, recent developments in well-posed variational problems, Math. Appl., vol. 331, pp. 211–227. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1995)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Revalski J.P.: Hadamard and strong well-posedness for convex programs. SIAM J. Optim. 7, 519–526 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tykhonov A.N.: On the stability of the functional optimization problem. USSR Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 6, 28–33 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yamashita N., Fukushima M.: On the level-boundedness of the natural residual function for variational inequality problems. Pac. J. Optim. 1, 625–630 (2005)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yang H., Yu J.: Unified approaches to well-posedness with some applications. J. Glob. Optim. 31, 371–381 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhu D.L.: Augmented Lagrangian theory, duality and decomposition methods for variational inequality problems. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 117, 195–216 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zolezzi T.: Well-posedness criteria in optimization with application to the calculus of variations. Nonlinear Anal. Theory Methods Appl. 25, 437–453 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zolezzi T.: Extended well-posedness of optimization problems. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 91, 257–266 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zolezzi T.: Well-posedness and optimization under perturbations. Ann. Oper. Res. 101, 351–361 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ManagementFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Department of Applied MathematicsHong Kong Polytechnic UniversityKowloonHong Kong

Personalised recommendations