Journal of Global Optimization

, Volume 40, Issue 1–3, pp 51–63

Dynamic equilibria of group vaccination strategies in a heterogeneous population

Article

Abstract

In this paper we present an evolutionary variational inequality model of vaccination strategies games in a population with a known vaccine coverage profile over a certain time interval. The population is considered to be heterogeneous, namely its individuals are divided into a finite number of distinct population groups, where each group has different perceptions of vaccine and disease risks. Previous game theoretical analyses of vaccinating behaviour have studied the strategic interaction between individuals attempting to maximize their health states, in situations where an individual’s health state depends upon the vaccination decisions of others due to the presence of herd immunity. Here we extend such analyses by applying the theory of evolutionary variational inequalities (EVI) to a (one parameter) family of generalized vaccination games. An EVI is used to provide conditions for existence of solutions (generalized Nash equilibria) for the family of vaccination games, while a projected dynamical system is used to compute approximate solutions of the EVI problem. In particular we study a population model with two groups, where the size of one group is strictly larger than the size of the other group (a majority/minority population). The smaller group is considered much less vaccination inclined than the larger group. Under these hypotheses, considering that the vaccine coverage of the entire population is measured during a vaccine scare period, we find that our model reproduces a feature of real populations: the vaccine averse minority will react immediately to a vaccine scare by dropping their strategy to a nonvaccinator one; the vaccine inclined majority does not follow a nonvaccinator strategy during the scare, although vaccination in this group decreases as well. Moreover we find that there is a delay in the majority’s reaction to the scare. This is the first time EVI problems are used in the context of mathematical epidemiology. The results presented emphasize the important role played by social heterogeneity in vaccination behaviour, while also highlighting the valuable role that can be played by EVI in this area of research.

Keywords

Vaccination strategies Population dynamics Evolutionary variational inequalities 

JEL Classification

C61 C68 C73 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Albert M.R., Ostheimer K.G. and Breman J.G. (2001). The last smallpox epidemic in Boston and the vaccination controversy, 1901–1903. N. Engl. J. Med. 344: 375–379 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson R.M. and May R.M. (1991). Infectious Diseases of Humans. Oxford University Press, Oxford Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baiocchim, C., Capello, A.: Variational and Quasivariational Inequalities. Applications to Free Boundary Problems. J. Wiley and Sons (1984)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bauch C.T. and Earn D.J.D. (2004). Vaccination and the theory of games. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101: 13391–13394 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bauch C.T. (2005). Imitation dynamics predict vaccinating behaviour. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 272: 1669–1675 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bensoussan A. (1974). Points des Nash dans le cas de fonctionelles quadratique et jeux differentiels lineaires a N-personnes. SIAM J. Control 12: 460–499 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bensoussan A. and Lions J.L. (1973). Nouvelle formulation de problemes de controle impulsionnel et applications. Comptes Rendus des Seances de l’Academie des Sciences 276: 1189–1192 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bensoussan A., Goursat M. and Lions J.L. (1973). Controle impulsionnel et innequations quasi-variationnelles stationnaires. Comptes Rendus des Seances de l’Academie des Sciences 276: 1279–1284 Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Biroscak B., Fiore A., Fasano N., Fineis P., Collins M. and Stoltman G. (2003). Impact of the thimerosal controversy on hepatitis B vaccine coverage of infants born to women of unknown hepatitis B surface antigen status in Michigan. Pediatrics 111: e645–e649 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brezis, H.: Inequations D’Evolution Abstraites. Comptes Rendue d’Academie des Sciences (1967)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chapman G.B. and Coups E.J. (1999). Predictors of influenza vaccine acceptance among healthy adults. Preventitive Medicine 29: 249–262 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cojocaru, M.-G.: Piecewise solutions of evolutionary variational inequalities. Consequences for double-layered dynamics modelling of equilibrium problems. J. Ineq. Pure Appl. Math. (to appear in) (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cojocaru M.-G., Bauch C., Johnston M. (2007) Dynamics of vaccination strategies via projected dynamical systems. Bull. Mathemat. Biol. 69(5):1453–1476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cojocaru M.-G., Daniele P. and Nagurney A. (2005). Projected dynamical systems and evolutionary variational inequalities via Hilbert spaces and applications. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 127(3): 549–563 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cojocaru M.-G., Daniele P., Nagurney A. (2006) Double-layer dynamics: a unified theory of projected dynamical systems and evolutionary variational inequalities. Eur. J. Operat. Res. 175(1):494–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cojocaru, M.-G., Daniele, P., Nagurney, A.: Projected dynamical systems, evolutionary variational inequalities, applications, and a computational procedure. In: Migdalos, A., Pardalos, P., Pitsoulis, L. (eds.) Pareto Optimality Game Theory and Equilibria. Nonconvex Optimization and its Applications Series, Springer (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cournot A.A. (1838). Researches into the Mathematical Principles of the Theory of Wealth, English translation 1897. MacMillan, London, England Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Daniele P., Maugeri A. and Oettli W. (1999). Time–dependent traffic equilibria. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 103: 543–554 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Daniele, P.: Dynamic Networks and Evolutionary Variational Inequalities. Edward Elgar Publishing (2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Durbach N. (2000). They might as well brand us: working class resistance to compulsory vaccination in Victorian England. Soc. Hist. Med. 13(1): 45–62 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fine P.E.M. and Clarkson J.A. (1986). Individual versus public priorities in the determination of optimal vaccination policies. Am. J. Epidem. 124: 1012–1020 Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gabay, D., Moulin, H.: On the uniqueness and stbility of Nash-equilibria in noncooperative games. In: Applied Stochastic Control in Econometrics and Management Science, North Holland, Amsterdam (1980)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gangarosa E.J., Galazka A.M., Wolfe C.R., Phillips L.M., Gangarosa R.E., Miller E. and Chen R.T. (1998). Impact of anti-vaccine movements on pertussis control: the untold story. Lancet 351: 356–361 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Geoffard P.Y. and Philipson T. (1997). Disease eradication: Private versus public vaccination. Am. Econ. Rev. 87: 222–230 Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Goldstein K.P., Philipson T.J., Joo H. and Daum R.S. (1996). The effect of epidemic measles on immunization rates. JAMA 276: 56–58 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Harker, P.T.: A variational inequality approach for the determination of oligopolistic market equilibrium (1984)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Harker P.T. (1991). Generalized Nash games and quasivariational inequalities. Eur. J. Operat. Res. 54: 81–94 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kinderlehrer, D., Stampacchia, G.: An Introduction to Variational Inequalities and Their Applications. Academic Press (1980)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lashuay N., Tjoa T., de Nuncio M.L.Z., Franklin M., Elder J. and Jones M. (2000). Exposure to immunization media messages among African American parents. Prev. Med. 31: 522–528 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lions J.P. and Stampacchia G. (1967). Variational inequalities. Communi. Pure Appl. Mathemat. 20: 493–519 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Maugeri, A., Vitanza, C.: Time-dependent equilibrium problems. In: Chinchuluun, A., Migdalas, A., Pardalos, P.M., Pitsoulis, L. (eds.) Pareto Optimality Game Theory and Equilibria, pp. 505–524. Nonconvex Optimization and its Applications Series, Springer (2006)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nash J.F. (1950). Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 36: 48–49 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nash J.F. (1951). Noncooperative games. Ann. Mathemat. 54: 286–298 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Plotkin S. (2002). Lessons learned concerning vaccine safety. Vaccine 20(Suppl. 1): S16–S19 Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Poland G. and Jacobsen R. (2001). Understanding those who do not understand: a brief review of the anti-vaccine movement. Vaccine 19: 2440–2445 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematics & StatisticsUniversity of GuelphGuelphCanada

Personalised recommendations