Advertisement

Journal of Genetic Counseling

, Volume 27, Issue 5, pp 1228–1237 | Cite as

Exploring the Issues Surrounding Clinical Exome Sequencing in the Prenatal Setting

  • Swetha Narayanan
  • Bruce Blumberg
  • Marla L. Clayman
  • Vivian Pan
  • Catherine Wicklund
Original Research

Abstract

Exome sequencing is a clinical diagnostic test offered primarily for children and adults with suspected genetic conditions. The purpose of this study was to explore issues related to exome sequencing in a reproductive clinical setting. This was a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. Participants were professionals drawn from four key stakeholder groups—healthcare providers, laboratory/industry, ethics, and government. Transcribed interviews were analyzed for emergent themes. Most participants saw potential clinical utility in offering prenatal exome sequencing for diagnostic purposes as opposed to screening. Participants expressed similar challenges already encountered with using exome sequencing in a pediatric setting, such as difficulty interpreting results and voiced many of the same concerns posed by prenatal testing, such as adequate pretest counseling. While previously reported issues and challenges were mentioned, participants agreed those difficulties are anticipated to be much greater with prenatal exome sequencing because of the scope of testing and the option for pregnancy decision-making. The results of this study help gain a better understanding of the implications of using exome sequencing in a prenatal setting. Development of guidelines is also warranted to aid clinical practice and laboratory standards for reporting prenatal results.

Keywords

Exome sequencing Prenatal Clinical Qualitative WES 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to acknowledge the Graduate Program in Genetic Counseling and Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine-Department of Preventive Medicine for funding this study. This work was conducted in partial fulfillment of the first author’s graduate degree requirement.

Author Contributions

The authors, Swetha Narayanan, MS, CGC; Catherine Wicklund, MS, CGC; Bruce Blumberg, MD; Marla Clayman, PhD, MPH; and Vivian Pan, MS, CGC, all provided thoughtful contributions to this study. Swetha Narayanan contributed to study design, data collection, data analysis, and manuscript writing. Catherine Wicklund aided in interview guide development, participant recruitment, data analysis, and manuscript editing. Bruce Blumberg provided assistance in participant recruitment and interview guide development. Marla Clayman provided expertise in qualitative methods and data analysis strategies. Vivian Pan contributed to interview guide development and manuscript editing.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Swetha Narayanan, Bruce Blumberg, Marla L Clayman, Vivian Pan, and Catherine Wicklund, declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human Studies and Informed Consent

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5). Informed consent was obtained from all participants for being included in the study.

Animal Studies

No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.

References

  1. Alamillo, C. L., Powis, Z., Farwell, K., Shahmirzadi, L., Weltmer, E. C., Turocy, J., Lowe, T., Kobelka, C., Chen, E., Basel, D., Ashkinadze, E., D'Augelli, L., Chao, E., & Tang, S. (2015). Exome sequencing positively identified relevant alterations in more than half of cases with an indication of prenatal ultrasound anomalies. Prenatal Diagnosis, 35(11), 1073–1078.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Amendola, L. M., Dorschner, M. O., Robertson, P. D., Salama, J. S., Hart, R., Shirts, B. H., Murray, M. L., Tokita, M. J., Gallego, C. J., Kim, D. S., Bennett, J. T., Crosslin, D. R., Ranchalis, J., Jones, K. L., Rosenthal, E. A., Jarvik, E. R., Itsara, A., Turner, E. H., Herman, D. S., Schleit, J., Burt, A., Jamal, S. M., Abrudan, J. L., Johnson, A. D., Conlin, L. K., Dulik, M. C., Santani, A., Metterville, D. R., Kelly, M., Foreman, A. K. M., Lee, K., Taylor, K. D., Guo, X., Crooks, K., Kiedrowski, L. A., Raffel, L. J., Gordon, O., Machini, K., Desnick, R. J., Biesecker, L. G., Lubitz, S. A., Mulchandani, S., Cooper, G. M., Joffe, S., Richards, C. S., Yang, Y., Rotter, J. I., Rich, S. S., O’Donnell, C. J., Berg, J. S., Spinner, N. B., Evans, J. P., Fullerton, S. M., Leppig, K. A., Bennett, R. L., Bird, T., Sybert, V. P., Grady, W. M., Tabor, H. K., Kim, J. H., Bamshad, M. J., Wilfond, B., Motulsky, A. G., Scott, C. R., Pritchard, C. C., Walsh, T. D., Burke, W., Raskind, W. H., Byers, P., Hisama, F. M., Rehm, H., Nickerson, D. A., & Jarvik, G. P. (2015). Actionable exomic incidental findings in 6503 participants: challenges of variant classification. Genome Research, 25(3), 305–315.  https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.183483.114.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Atwal, P. S., Brennan, M., Cox, R., Niaki, M., Platt, J., Homeyer, M., et al. (2014). Clinical whole-exome sequencing: are we there yet? Genetics in Medicine, 16(9), 717–719.  https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2014.10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Berg, J. S., Khoury, M. J., & Evans, J. P. (2011). Deploying whole genome sequencing in clinical practice and public health: meeting the challenge one bin at a time. Genetics in Medicine, 13(6), 499–504.  https://doi.org/10.1097/gim.0b013e318220aaba.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernhardt, B. A., Soucier, D., Hanson, K., Savage, M. S., Jackson, L., & Wapner, R. J. (2012). Women’s experiences receiving abnormal prenatal chromosomal microarray testing results. Genetics in Medicine, 15(2), 139–145.  https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2012.113.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Carss, K. J., Hillman, S. C., Parthiban, V., Mcmullan, D. J., Maher, E. R., Kilby, M. D., & Hurles, M. E. (2014). Exome sequencing improves genetic diagnosis of structural fetal abnormalities revealed by ultrasound. Human Molecular Genetics, 23(12), 3269–3277.  https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddu038.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen, E. A., & Schiffman, J. F. (2000). Attitudes toward genetic counseling and prenatal diagnosis among a group of individuals with physical disabilities. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 9(2), 137–152.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Choi, H., Riper, M. V., & Thoyre, S. (2012). Decision making following a prenatal diagnosis of down syndrome: an integrative review. Journal of Midwifery & Womens Health, 57(2), 156–164.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-2011.2011.00109.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Committee Opinion No. 682 Microarrays and next-generation sequencing technology: the use of advanced genetic diagnostic tools in obstetrics and gynecology. (2016). Obstetrics & Gynecology, 128(6). doi:  https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000001817.
  10. Deans, Z., Clarke, A. J., & Newson, A. J. (2014). For your interest? The ethical acceptability of using non-invasive prenatal testing to test ‘purely for information’. Bioethics, 29(1), 19–25.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deluca, J. M., Kearney, M. H., Norton, S. A., & Arnold, G. L. (2011). Parents experiences of expanded newborn screening evaluations. Pediatrics, 128(1), 53–61.  https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-3413.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Dondorp, W., Sikkema-Raddatz, B., Die-Smulders, C. D., & Wert, G. D. (2012). Arrays in postnatal and prenatal diagnosis: an exploration of the ethics of consent. Human Mutation, 33(6), 916–922.  https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.22068.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Drury, S., Williams, H., Trump, N., Boustred, C., Gene, G. O. S., Lench, N., et al. (2015). Exome sequencing for prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with sonographic abnormalities. Prenatal Diagnosis, 35(10), 1010–1017.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.4675.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gamba, P., & Midrio, P. (2014). Abdominal wall defects: prenatal diagnosis, newborn management, and long-term outcomes. Seminary in Pediatric Surgery, 23(5), 283–290.  https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2014.09.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Green, R. C., Berg, J. S., Grody, W. W., Kalia, S. S., Korf, B. R., Martin, C. L., McGuire, A., Nussbaum, R. L., O’Daniel, J. M., Ormond, K. E., Rehm, H. L., Watson, M. S., Williams, M. S., Biesecker, L. G., & American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. (2013). GOS gene exome and genome sequencing. Genetics in Medicine, 15(7), 565–574.  https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2013.73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Gregg, A. R., Skotko, B. G., Benkendorf, J. L., Monaghan, K. G., Bajaj, K., Best, R. G., Klugman, S., & Watson, M. S. (2016). Noninvasive prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy, 2016 update: a position statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Genetics in Medicine, 18(10), 1056–1065.  https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2016.97.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Grody, W. W., Thompson, B. H., & Hudgins, L. (2013). Whole-exome/genome sequencing and genomics. Pediatrics, 132(supplement). doi:  https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-1032e.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Guest, G., Namey, E. E., & Mitchell, M. L. (2012). Collecting qualitative data, a field manual for applied research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.Google Scholar
  19. Hillman, S. C., Mcmullan, D. J., Hall, G., Togneri, F. S., James, N., Maher, E. J., et al. (2013). Use of prenatal chromosomal microarray: prospective cohort study and systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 41(6), 610–620.  https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.12464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hillman, S., Willams, D., Carss, K. J., Mcmullan, D., Hurles, M. E., & Kilby, M. (2014). Prenatal exome sequencing for fetuses with structural abnormalities: the next step. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 45(1), 4–9.  https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.14653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Iglesias A, Anyane-yeboa K, Wynn J, Wilson, A., Truitt, C. M., Guzman, E, et al. (2014). The usefulness of whole-exome sequencing in routine clinical practice. Genetics in Medicine, 16(12):922–931. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2014.58.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Jacob, H. J., Abrams, K., Bick, D. P., Brodie, K., Dimmock, D. P., Farrell, M., Geurts, J., Harris, J., Helbling, D., Joers, B. J., Kliegman, R., Kowalski, G., Lazar, J., Margolis, D. A., North, P., Northup, J., Roquemore-Goins, A., Scharer, G., Shimoyama, M., Strong, K., Taylor, B., Tsaih, S. W., Tschannen, M. R., Veith, R. L., Wendt-Andrae, J., Wilk, B., & Worthey, E. A. (2013). Genomics in clinical practice: lessons from the front lines. Science Translational Medicine, 94(5), 194cm5.  https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3006468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jong, A. D., Dondorp, W. J., Frints, S. G., Die-Smulders, C. E., & De Wert, G. M. W. R. (2011). Advances in prenatal screening: the ethical dimension. Nature Reviews Genetics, 12(9), 657–663.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3036.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kalia, S. S., Adelman, K., Bale, S. J., Chung, W. K., Eng, C., Evans, J. P., Herman, G. E., Hufnagel, S. B., Klein, T. E., Korf, B. R., McKelvey, K. D., Ormond, K. E., Richards, C. S., Vlangos, C. N., Watson, M., Martin, C. L., & Miller, D. T. (2016). Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Genetics in Medicine, 19(2), 249–255.  https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2016.190.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kalynchuk, E. J., Althouse, A., Parker, L. S., Saller, D. N., & Rajkovic, A. (2015). Prenatal whole-exome sequencing: parental attitudes. Prenatal Diagnosis., 35(10), 1030–1036.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.4635.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Levenseller, B. L., Soucier, D. J., Miller, V. A., Harris, D., Conway, L., & Bernhardt, B. A. (2013). Stakeholders’ opinions on the implementation of pediatric whole exome sequencing: implications for informed consent. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23(4), 552–565.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-013-9626-y.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Machini, K., Douglas, J., Braxton, A., Tsipis, J., & Kramer, K. (2014). Genetic counselors’ views and experiences with the clinical integration of genome sequencing. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23(4), 496–505.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-014-9709-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Madeo, A. C., Biesecker, B. B., Brasington, C., Erby, L. H., & Peters, K. F. (2011). The relationship between the genetic counseling profession and the disability community: a commentary. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 155(8), 1777–1785.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.34054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pangalos, C., Hagnefelt, B., Lilakos, K., & Konialis, C. (2016). First applications of a targeted exome sequencing approach in fetuses with ultrasound abnormalities reveals an important fraction of cases with associated gene defects. Peer J, 26, 4–e1955.  https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pinxten, W., & Howard, H. C. (2014). Ethical issues raised by whole genome sequencing. Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology, 28(2), 269–279.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpg.2014.02.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Quinlan-Jones, E., Kilby, M. D., Greenfield, S., Parker, M., McMullan, D., Hurles, M. E., & Hillman, S. (2016). Prenatal whole exome sequencing: the views of clinicians, scientists, genetic counsellors and patient representatives. Prenatal Diagnosis, 36(10), 935–941.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.4916.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Quinlan-Jones, E., Hillman, S. C., Kilby, M. D., & Greenfield, S. M. (2017). Parental experiences of prenatal whole exome sequencing (WES) in cases of ultrasound diagnosed fetal structural anomaly. Prenatal Diagnosis, 37, 1225–1231.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.5172.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Saldana J. (2012). Chapter one: an introduction to coding and codes. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.Google Scholar
  34. Taber, J. M., Klein, W. M., Ferrer, R. A., Han, P. K., Lewis, K. L., Biesecker, L. G., & Biesecker, B. B. (2015). Perceived ambiguity as a barrier to intentions to learn genome sequencing results. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 38(5), 715–726.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-015-9642-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Taber, K. A., Dickinson, B. D., & Wilson, M. (2014). The promise and challenges of next-generation genome sequencing for clinical care. JAMA Internal Medicine, 174(2), 275–280.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.12048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Timmermans, S., & Buchbinder, M. (2010). Patients-in-waiting: living between sickness and health in the genomics era. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 51(4), 408–423.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146510386794.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Tetreault, M., Bareke, E., Nadaf, J., Alirezaie, N., & Majewski, J. (2015). Whole-exome sequencing as a diagnostic tool: current challenges and future opportunities. Expert Review Molecular Diagnosis, 15(6), 749–760.  https://doi.org/10.1586/14737159.2015.1039516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vora, N. L., Powell, B., Brandt, A., Strande, N., Hardisty, E., Gilmore, K., Foreman, A. K. M., Wilhelmsen, K., Bizon, C., Reilly, J., Owen, P., Powell, C. M., Skinner, D., Rini, C., Lyerly, A. D., Boggess, K. A., Weck, K., Berg, J. S., & Evans, J. P. (2017). Prenatal exome sequencing in anomalous fetuses: new opportunities and challenges. Genetics in Medicine, 19(11), 1207–1216.  https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2017.33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Walkiewicz, M. (2016). The utility of whole exome sequencing in prenatal diagnosis. Presentation at the American Society of Human Genetics Annual Conference, Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
  40. Wapner, R. J., Driscoll, D. A., & Simpson, J. L. (2012). Integration of microarray technology into prenatal diagnosis: counselling issues generated during the NICHD clinical trial. Prenatal Diagnosis, 32(4), 396–400.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.3863.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Westerfield, L., Darilek, S., & Van den veyver IB. (2014). Counseling challenges with variants of uncertain significance and incidental findings in prenatal genetic screening and diagnosis. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 3(3), 1018–1032.  https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm3031018.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Westerfield, L. E., Stover, S. R., Mathur, V. S., Nassef, S. A., Carter, T. G., Yang, Y., Eng, C. M., & van den Veyver, I. B. (2015). Reproductive genetic counseling challenges associated with diagnostic exome sequencing in a large academic private reproductive genetic counseling practice. Prenatal Diagnosis, 35(10), 1022–1029.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.4674.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Wolf, S. M., Annas, G. J., & Elias, S. (2013). Patient autonomy and incidental findings in clinical genomics. Science, 340(6136), 1049–1050.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239119.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Yang, Y., Muzny, D. M., Xia, F., Niu, Z., Person, R., Ding, Y., Ward, P., Braxton, A., Wang, M., Buhay, C., Veeraraghavan, N., Hawes, A., Chiang, T., Leduc, M., Beuten, J., Zhang, J., He, W., Scull, J., Willis, A., Landsverk, M., Craigen, W. J., Bekheirnia, M. R., Stray-Pedersen, A., Liu, P., Wen, S., Alcaraz, W., Cui, H., Walkiewicz, M., Reid, J., Bainbridge, M., Patel, A., Boerwinkle, E., Beaudet, A. L., Lupski, J. R., Plon, S. E., Gibbs, R. A., & Eng, C. M. (2014). Molecular findings among patients referred for clinical whole-exome sequencing. JAMA, 312(18), 1870–1879.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.14601.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Yurkiewicz, I. R., Korf, B. R., & Lehmann, L. S. (2014). Prenatal whole-genome sequencing—is the quest to know a fetus’s future ethical? New England Journal of Medicine, 370(3), 195–197.  https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmp1215536.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© National Society of Genetic Counselors, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Medical GeneticsUniversity of Texas Medical BranchGalvestonUSA
  2. 2.Department of GeneticsKaiser PermanenteOaklandUSA
  3. 3.Department of Health Care Research and EvaluationAmerican Institutes for ResearchWashingtonUSA
  4. 4.Division of GeneticsAdvocate Medical GroupPark RidgeUSA
  5. 5.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of MedicineNorthwestern UniversityChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations