Advertisement

Journal of Genetic Counseling

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 978–987 | Cite as

Perceived Changes to Obstetric Care and the Integration of Personal and Professional Life as a Pregnant Prenatal Genetic Counselor

  • Jennifer L. Rietzler
  • Laura E. Birkeland
  • Elizabeth M. Petty
Original Research
  • 171 Downloads

Abstract

The impact of practicing as a prenatal genetic counselor while pregnant is unclear given the limited amount of published literature on this issue. To address this gap in knowledge, a total of 215 current and past prenatal genetic counselors provided insights regarding this personal yet professional juncture through completion of an online survey that allowed for both close-ended and open-ended responses. While participants agreed that experiencing pregnancy affected their perspectives and counseling in several ways, this paper focuses on one particular finding—that of the changes in their own obstetric care perceived by genetic counselors while working within the prenatal setting and being pregnant themselves. As a result of these changes, considerations about when to disclose a pregnancy to colleagues along with how to integrate personal and professional needs as a pregnant prenatal genetic counselor surfaced. Additional findings, practice implications, and research recommendations are discussed.

Keywords

Self-disclosure Patient-peer Compassion fatigue Favor Well-being 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was completed in fulfillment of the requirements for the first author’s Master of Science degree in Medical Genetics from the University of Wisconsin-Madison’s Genetic Counselor Training Program. The investigators thank the 215 participants who completed the survey for their time spent taking the survey and their insights regarding this topic. They would also like to gratefully acknowledge those individuals who participated in the pilot survey including Kara Reynolds, Craig Adamski, Ashley Kuhl, Michelle Kempf-Weibel, and Natalie Berger. A special thank you to Margo Grady, Jason Flanagan, and Kimberly Anderson for their time and feedback as readers of the manuscript. Additionally, thank you to Qianqian Zhao and Mary Lindstrom for providing statistical data analysis and for their guidance and instruction with interpreting the data.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Jennifer L. Rietzler, Laura E. Birkeland, and Elizabeth M. Petty declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human Studies and Informed Consent

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants in the study.

Animal Studies

No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this study.

References

  1. Balcom, J. R., McCarthy Veach, P., Bemmels, H., Redlinger-Grosse, K., & LeRoy, B. S. (2013). When the topic is you: genetic counselor responses to prenatal patients’ requests for self-disclosure. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 22, 358–373.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Clark, K. (2010). Life as a pregnant genetic counselor. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 19(3), 235–237.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Clark, K. (2012). Life as a pregnant genetic counselor: take two. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 21, 27–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hatten, B. (2002). Pregnancy and genetic counseling: the other side of the fence. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 11(44), 299–300.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Hodgson, J. M., Gillam, L. H., Sahhar, M. A., & Metcalfe, S. A. (2010). “Testing times, challenging choices”: an Australian study of prenatal genetic counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 19, 22–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Keilman, K. (2002). Genetic counselor or patient-who am I today? Journal of Genetic Counseling, 11(4), 289–292.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. McCarthy Veach, P., Bartels, D. M., & LeRoy, B. S. (2002). Defining moments: important lessons for genetic counselors. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 11(4), 334–337.Google Scholar
  8. Menezes, M.A. (2010). Life on the front line: exploring person and professional impacts on healthcare professionals working with fetal anomaly. PhD thesis, Medicine, Dentistry & Health Sciences, Department of Pediatrics, The University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  9. Menezes, M. A. (2012). Commentary on “life as a pregnant genetic counselor: take two”. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 21, 31–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Menezes, M. A., Hodgson, J. M., Sahhar, M. A., Aitken, M., & Metcalfe, S. A. (2010). “It’s challenging on a personal level”—exploring the ‘lived experience’ of Australian and Canadian prenatal genetic counselors. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 19, 640–652.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. National Society of Genetic Counselors: NSGC Code of Ethics [Internet]. nsgc.org [cited 2017 June 18]. Available from: http://nsgc.org/p/cm/ld/fid=12
  12. Vokits Cohen, S. A. (2002). Lifetime continuing education: learning from my son. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 11(4), 281–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Zucker, J. (2015). The pregnant therapist. The New York Times.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© National Society of Genetic Counselors, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer L. Rietzler
    • 1
    • 2
  • Laura E. Birkeland
    • 1
  • Elizabeth M. Petty
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine and Public HealthUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations