Family Communication, Risk Perception and Cancer Knowledge of Young Adults from BRCA1/2 Families: a Systematic Review
Understanding challenges in familial communication of cancer risk has informed genetic service delivery. Parent-child interactions have received considerable attention, but few studies focus on young adulthood experiences within BRCA1/2 families. Young adults are approaching, or at a life stage where awareness of hereditary cancer risk is vital for informed choice of risk management options. This review assesses family communication, risk perception and cancer knowledge held by 18–40 year old individuals who have a parent with a BRCA1/2 gene mutation or carry the gene mutation themselves. Thirteen papers met the inclusion criteria. One utilized a ‘mixed methods’ methodology and the remaining used a qualitative approach. Findings were synthesized into themes and reported narratively. In general, parents are communicating openly about genetic risk with young adult offspring, but there is evidence that some young adults are withholding information from their parents about their own test results. Risk perception is influenced by a family history of cancer, childbearing plans and health providers’ advice. Misconceptions about genetic risk appear to be common and gaps in hereditary cancer knowledge are evident. It is unclear whether incorrect knowledge was passed from parents to offspring. Health providers need to provide developmentally appropriate services for emerging adults (18–25 years old), with particular support in navigating through risk management options.
KeywordsBRCA mutation Young adult Emerging adult Family communication Cancer knowledge Risk perception Systematic review
- Antoniou, A., Pharoah, P. D. P., Narod, S., Risch, H. A., Eyfjord, J. E., Hopper, J. L., et al. (2003). Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with brca1 or brca2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history: A combined analysis of 22 studies. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 72(5), 1117–1130. doi:10.1086/375033.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Antoniou, A. C., Rookus, M., Andrieu, N., Brohet, R., Chang-Claude, J., Peock, S., et al. (2009). Reproductive and hormonal factors, and ovarian cancer risk for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: Results from the international BRCA1/2 carrier cohort study. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, 18(2), 601–610. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Arnett, J. J. (2010). Adolescence and emerging adulthood: A cultural approach (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Arnett, J. J., & Schwab, J. (2015). Clark University poll of emerging adults: Work, education and identity. Retrieved from http://www.clarku.edu/clark-poll-emerging-adults/.
- Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2013). Young adults: Then and now. 4102.0 - Australian Social Trends, April 2013. Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4102.0Main+Features40April+2013-end2.
- Bodurtha, J. N., McClish, D., Gyure, M., Corona, R., Krist, A. H., Rodríguez, V. M., et al. (2014). The KinFact intervention – A randomized controlled trial to increase family communication about cancer history. Journal of Women's Health, 23(10), 86–816. doi:10.1089/jwh.2014.4754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Broderick, C. B. (1993). The regulation of vertical space and vertical placement. Understanding family process: Basics of family systems theory (pp. 162–184). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Cancer Institute NSW. (2015). Information for people and families with a faulty BRCA1 gene (mutation). eviQ Cancer Treatments Online. V.4. Retrieved from http://www.eviq.org.au.
- Carter, B., & McGoldrick, M. (2005). Overview: The expanded family life cycle: Individual, family, and social perspectives. In B. Carter & M. McGoldrick (Eds.), The expanded family life cycle: Individual, family, and social perspectives (3rd ed., pp. 1–26). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
- Chivers Seymour, K., Addington-Hall, J., Lucassen, A. M., & Foster, C. L. (2010). What facilitates or impedes family communication following genetic testing for cancer risk? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of primary qualitative research. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 19(4), 330–342. doi:10.1007/s10897-010-9296-y.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Eisler, I., Ellison, M., Flinter, F., Grey, J., Hutchison, S., Jackson, C., et al. (2016). Developing an intervention to facilitate family communication about inherited genetic conditions, and training genetic counsellors in its delivery. European Journal of Human Genetics, 24(6), 794. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2015.215.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Forbes, L. J. L., Simon, A. E., Warburton, F., Boniface, D., Brain, K. E., Dessaix, A., et al. (2013). Differences in cancer awareness and beliefs between Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the UK (the international cancer benchmarking partnership): Do they contribute to differences in cancer survival? British Journal of Cancer, 108(2), 292–300. doi:10.1038/bjc.2012.542.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Healey, E., Taylor, N., Greening, S., Wakefield, C. E., Warwick, L., & Williams, R., et al. (2017). Quantifying family dissemination and identifying barriers to communication of risk information in Australian BRCA families. Genetics in Medicine. doi:10.1038/gim.2017.52.
- Hodgson, J., Metcalfe, S., Gaff, C., Donath, S., Delatycki, M. B., Winship, I., et al. (2016). Outcomes of a randomised controlled trial of a complex genetic counselling intervention to improve family communication. European Journal of Human Genetics, 24(3), 356. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2015.122.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hunter, D. J., Colditz, G. A., Hankinson, S. E., Malspeis, S., Spiegelman, D., Chen, W., et al. (2010). Oral contraceptive use and breast cancer: a prospective study of young women. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention : A Publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, Cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 19(10), 2496–2502. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0747.
- Jacobs, C., Pichert, G., Harris, J., Tucker, K., & Michie, S. (2017). Key messages for communicating information about BRCA1 and BRCA2 to women with breast or ovarian cancer: Consensus across health professionals and service users. Psycho-Oncology. doi:10.1002/pon.4379.
- Kmet, L. M., Lee, R. C., & Cook, L. S. (2004). Standard quality assessment criteria for evaluating primary research papers from a variety of fields. Edmonton: Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research.Google Scholar
- Laidsaar-Powell, R. C., Butow, P. N., Bu, S., Charles, C., Gafni, A., Lam, W. W. T., et al. (2013). Physician-patient-companion communication and decision-making: A systematic review of triadic medical consultations. Patient Education and Counseling, 91(1), 3–13. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2012.11.007.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., et al. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000100. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Manne, S., Audrain, J., Schwartz, M., Main, D., Finch, C., & Lerman, C. (2004). Associations between relationship support and psychological reactions of participants and partners to BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing in a clinic-based sample. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 28(3), 211–225.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mendes, Á., Chiquelho, R., Santos, T. A., & Sousa, L. (2010). Family matters: Examining a multi-family group intervention for women with BRCA mutations in the scope of genetic counselling. Journal of Community Genetics, 1(4), 161–168. doi:10.1007/s12687-010-0022-0.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Metcalfe, A., Coad, J., Plumridge, G. M., Gill, P., & Farndon, P. (2008). Family communication between children and their parents about inherited genetic conditions: A meta-synthesis of the research. European Journal of Human Genetics, 16(10), 1193–1200. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2008.84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Montgomery, S. V., Barsevick, A. M., Egleston, B. L., Bingler, R., Ruth, K., Miller, S. M., et al. (2013). Preparing individuals to communicate genetic test results to their relatives: Report of a randomized control trial. Familial Cancer, 12(3), 537–546. doi:10.1007/s10689-013-9609-z.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Moorman, P. G., Havrilesky, L. J., Gierisch, J. M., Coeytaux, R. R., Lowery, W. J., Urrutia, R. P., et al. (2013). Oral contraceptives and risk of ovarian cancer and breast cancer among high-risk women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 31(33), 4188–4198. doi:10.1200/jco.2013.48.9021.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nelson, L. J., & Luster, S. S. (2015). “Adulthood” by whose definition?: The complexity of emerging adults' conceptions of adulthood. In J. J. Arnett (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of emerging adulthood (pp. 421–437). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Patenaude, A. F., & Schneider, K. A. (2016). Issues arising in psychological consultations to help parents talk to minor and young adult children about their cancer genetic test result: A guide to providers. Journal of Genetic Counseling. doi:10.1007/s10897-016-0010-6.
- Peshkin, B. N., DeMarco, T. A., & Tercyak, K. P. (2010). On the development of a decision support intervention for mothers undergoing BRCA1/2 cancer genetic testing regarding communicating test results to their children. Familial Cancer, 9(1), 89–97. doi:10.1007/s10689-009-9267-3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Santerre-Theil, A., Bouchard, K., St-Pierre, D., Drolet, A.-M., Chiquette, J., Dorval, M., et al. (2016). Development of a Tool to guide parents carrying a BRCA1/2 mutation share genetic results with underage children. Journal of Cancer Education. doi:10.1007/s13187-016-1127-x.
- Shkedi-Rafid, S., Fenwick, A., Dheensa, S., & Lucassen, A. M. (2015). Genetic testing of children for adult-onset conditions: Opinions of the British adult population and implications for clinical practice. European Journal of Human Genetics, 23(10), 1281–1285. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2014.221.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Statistics Canada (2015). Living arrangements of young adults aged 20 to 29. Families, households and marital status. Retrieved from http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/as-sa/98-312-x/98-312-x2011003_3-eng.cfm.
- Tercyak, K. P., Mays, D., DeMarco, T. A., Peshkin, B. N., Valdimarsdottir, H. B., Schneider, K. A., et al. (2013). Decisional outcomes of maternal disclosure of BRCA1/2 genetic test results to children. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention : A Publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, Cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 22(7), 1260–1266. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Census Bureau, U. S. (2016). Current population survey, annual social and economic supplements, 1983 to 2016. US Census Bureau: Washington D.C.Google Scholar
- Vos, J., Jansen, A. M., Menko, F. H., Asperen, v. C. J., Stiggelbout, A. M., & Tibben, A. (2011a). Family communication matters: The impact of telling relatives about unclassified variants and uninformative DNA-test results. Genetics in Medicine, 13(4), 333–341. doi:10.1097/GIM.0b013e318204cfed.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vos, J., Menko, F., Jansen, A. M., van Asperen, C. J., Stiggelbout, A. M., & Tibben, A. (2011b). A whisper-game perspective on the family communication of DNA-test results: A retrospective study on the communication process of BRCA1/2-test results between proband and relatives. Familial Cancer, 10(1), 87–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Werner-Lin, A., Hoskins, L. M., Doyle, M. H., & Greene, M. H. (2012). Cancer doesn't have an age': Genetic testing and cancer risk management in BRCA1/2 mutation-positive women aged 18-24. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness & Medicine, 16(6), 636–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar