Abstract
Few studies have explored the public’s views of genetic counseling services, and even fewer focus on founder populations with high prevalence of genetic disease, such as Hutterites. The Hutterites are an Anabaptist religious group grounded in a strong Christian faith. The primary aim of this study was to assess Hutterites’ views of genetic counseling services. A secondary aim was to compare their views to those obtained in a study of rural Midwestern U.S. residents (Riesgraf et al., Journal of Genetic Counseling, 24(4), 565-579, 2015). One-hundred eleven individuals from southern Manitoba Hutterite colonies completed an anonymous survey assessing familiarity with and attitudes about genetic counseling; perceptions of its purpose, scope and practice; and willingness to use genetic counseling services. Although many respondents were not familiar with genetic counseling, most had accurate perceptions and positive attitudes. For instance, mean ratings showed endorsement of trust in information provided by genetic counselors and agreement that genetic counseling aligns with their values. Logistic regression indicated reported willingness to use genetic counseling services increased if respondents: had a higher self-rated familiarity with genetic counseling; were younger; agreed with the statement: I would trust the information provided by a genetic counselor; and disagreed with the statements: Genetic counseling is only useful for a small group of people with rare diseases, and Genetic counselors help expectant parents choose the eye color of their child. Thematic analysis of comments regarding willingness to use genetic counseling services yielded themes of personal/family risk, pragmatism (genetic counseling is sensible and practical for managing health concerns), and desire to prevent genetic conditions in the Hutterite population. Comparison of the present findings to those of Riesgraf et al. suggests predictors of Hutterites’ willingness to use genetic counseling are unique and culturally-based. Limited replication of Riesgraf et al. was achieved. Additional findings, practice implications and research recommendations are presented.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albada, A., Van Dulmen, S., Lindhout, D., Bensing, J. M., & Ausems, M. G. (2012). A pre-visit tailored website enhances counselees’ realistic expectations and knowledge and fulfils information needs for breast cancer genetic counseling. Familial Cancer, 11(1), 85–95.
Anderson, R. L., Murray, K., Chong, J. X., Ouwenga, R., Antillon, M., Chen, P., et al. (2014). Disclosure of genetic research results to members of a founder population. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23, 984–991.
Boycott, K. M., Parboosingh, J. S., Chodirker, B. N., Lowry, R. B., McLeod, D. R., Morris, J., et al. (2008). Clinical genetics and the Hutterite population: A review of Mendelian disorders. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 146A(8), 1088–1098.
Brensinger, J. D., & Laxova, R. (1995). The Amish: Perceptions of genetic disorders and services. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 4, 27–46.
Briggs, C. (1988). Health care beliefs and practices of the Hutterites of Forest River community, North Dakota. Journal of the American Historical Society of Germans from Russia, 11(1), 24–30.
Cacciatore, J., & Ong, R. (2013). Through the touch of god: Child death and spiritual sustenance in a Hutterian colony. Omega, 64(3), 185–202.
Cacciatore, J., & Thieleman, K. (2014). We rise out of the cradle into the grave: An ethnographic exploration of ritual, mourning, and death on a Hutterite colony. Omega, 69(4), 357–379.
Creighton, S., Almqvist, E., MacGregor, D., Fernandez, B., Hogg, H., Beis, J., et al. (2003). Predictive, prenatal and diagnostic genetic testing for Huntington’s disease: The experience in Canada from 1987 to 2000. Clinical Genetics, 63, 462–475.
Cyr, A., Dunnagan, T., & Haynes, G. (2010). Efficacy of the health belief model for predicting intention to pursue genetic testing for colorectal cancer. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 19, 174–186.
Fishbein, M., & Yzer, M. (2003). Using theory to design effective health behavior interventions. Communication Theory, 13, 164–183.
Giarelli, E., & Tulman, L. (2003). Methodological issues in the use of published cartoons as data. Qualitative Health Research, 13, 945–956.
Heitala, M., Hakonen, A., Aro, A. R., Peltonen, L., & Aula, P. (1995). Attitudes toward genetic testing among the general population and relatives of patients with a severe genetic disease: A survey from Finland. American Journal of Human Genetics, 56, 1493–1500.
Honaker, J., King, G., & Blackwell, M. (2010). Amelia II: A program for missing data. R package version 1.2–17. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Amelia.
Hutterian Brethern. (2012). Our Beliefs. http://www.hutterites.org/. Accessed 21 July 2015.
Joseph, G., Beattie, M. S., Lee, R., Braithwaite, D., Wilcox, C., Metrikin, M., & Luce, J. (2010). Pre-counseling education for low literacy women at risk of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC): Patient experiences using the cancer risk education intervention tool (CREdIT). Journal of Genetic Counseling, 19, 447–462.
Kulig, J., Meyer, C., Hill, S., Handley, C., Lichtenberger, S., & Myck, S. (2002). Refusals and delay of immunization within southwest Alberta. Understanding alternative beliefs and religious perspectives. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 93(2), 109–112.
MacFarlane, I. M., McCarthy Veach, P., & Leroy, B. S. (2014). Genetic counseling research: A practical guide. New York: Oxford Press.
Maio, M., Carrion, P., Yaremco, E., & Austin, J. C. (2013). Awareness of genetic counseling and perceptions of its purpose: A survey of the Canadian public. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 22, 762–770.
Martin, A. O. (1970). The founder effect in a human isolate: Evolutionary implications. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 32, 351–368.
McBride, C., Alford, S., Reid, R., Larson, E., Baxevanis, A., & Cody, L. (2009). Characteristics of users of online personalized genomic risk assessments: Implications for physician-patient interactions. Genetics in Medicine, 11, 582–587.
Metcalfe, A., Werrett, J., Burgess, L., & Clifford, C. (2007). Psychosocial impact of the lack of information given at referral about familial risk for cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 16(5), 458–465.
Miller, S. R., & Schwartz, R. H. (1992). Attitudes towards genetic testing of Amish, Mennonite, and Hutterite families with cystic fibrosis. American Journal of Public Health, 82(2), 236–242.
Peters, S., & Shiyanbola, O. (2013). Use and perception of herbal and dietary supplements in the Hutterites of South Dakota. South Dakota Journal of Medicine, 66(12), 497-9, 501, 503.
R Development Core Team. (2010). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org.
Riesgraf, R., Veach, P., MacFarlane, I., & LeRoy, B. (2015). Perceptions and attitudes about genetic counseling among residents of a midwestern rural area. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 24(4), 565–579.
Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: Wiley.
Schlomer, G. L., Bauman, S., & Card, N. A. (2010). Best practices for missing data management in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57, 1–10.
Shaw, J., & Bassi, K. (2001). Lay attitudes toward genetic testing for susceptibility to inherited diseases. Journal of Health Psychology, 6, 405–423.
Acknowledgements
This study was completed in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the first author’s Master of Science degree from the University of Minnesota. We would like to express our gratitude to the genetic counselors and geneticists who assisted with the survey piloting and the
Dr. Christina Palmer served as Action Editor on the manuscript review process and publication decision.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Amber P. Gemmell, Patricia McCarthy Veach, Ian M. MacFarlane, Rachel Riesgraf, and Bonnie S. LeRoy declare they have no conflict of interest.
Human Studies and Informed Consent
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. This study was approved by the University of Minnesota IRB. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Animal Studies
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 11 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gemmell, A.P., Veach, P.M., MacFarlane, I. et al. “If It Helps, It’s Worth a Try”: an Investigation of Perceptions and Attitudes about Genetic Counseling among Southern Manitoba Hutterites. J Genet Counsel 26, 1357–1371 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-017-0121-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-017-0121-8