Advertisement

Journal of Genetic Counseling

, Volume 26, Issue 5, pp 948–962 | Cite as

Seekers, Finders, Settlers, and Stumblers: Identifying the Career Paths of Males in the Genetic Counseling Profession

  • Anthony Chen
  • Pat McCarthy Veach
  • Cheri Schoonveld
  • Heather ZierhutEmail author
Original Research

Abstract

Genetic counseling is a female-dominated profession, with 96% of counselors self-identifying as female. Research suggests gender diversification benefits healthcare professionals and the populations they serve. Therefore, this study explored how men choose a genetic counseling career, associations between career satisfaction and their career entry dynamics and experience levels, and differences due to experience level in how they decide on this profession. Twenty-five novice, experienced, or seasoned male counselors and 8 male genetic counseling students participated in semi-structured phone interviews. Interpretive content and cross-case analyses of interview data were informed by Simpson’s “Seekers, Finders, and Settlers” theory describing career entry dynamics of men in non-traditional (i.e., female-dominated) fields. Results revealed 13 interviewees were Seekers, who initially knew they wanted a career in genetic counseling, actively chose the profession, and were satisfied with their decision. Eleven were Settlers, who had tried different, traditional jobs, with limited satisfaction before actively finding and choosing genetic counseling. Two were Finders, who discovered genetic counseling while in the career decision making process and made a passive choice to pursue it as they had no feasible, satisfactory alternative. Seven men fit a new category, we termed “Stumblers,” who were in another career and satisfied, but changed to genetic counseling after happening to hear about it. Prevalent themes pertaining to participants’ experiences in the career include desire for a multidisciplinary career; lack of a priori knowledge of genetic counselor roles; late exposure to the profession; and varied perceptions of being in a non-traditional career. There were few differences due to experience level and career satisfaction was high across the sample. Results suggest earlier exposure to the career and availability of detailed descriptions of its multidisciplinary nature may increase the number of males in the profession.

Keywords

Male genetic counselors Career satisfaction Career interests Gender diversity Experience levels Recruitment 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was completed in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the first author’s Masters of Science degree from the University of Minnesota. We would like to thank the participants for their time and valuable input.

Dr. Christina Palmer served as Action Editor on the manuscript review process and publication decision.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Anthony Chen, Patricia McCarthy Veach, Cheri Schoonveld, and Heather Zierhut declare they have no conflict of interest.

Human Studies and Informed Consent

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. This study was approved by the University of Minnesota IRB. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Animal Studies

No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.

References

  1. Association of Genetic Counseling Program Directors Meeting (2014). Denver, Colorado.Google Scholar
  2. Bartoshesky, L. E., Hirsch, L. (2014). Kids Health: Genetic Counseling.Google Scholar
  3. Bradley, H. (1993). Across the great divide: the entry of men into women’s jobs. In C. Williams (Ed.), Doing women’s work: men in nontraditional occupations (pp. 10–28). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Career Profiles: Genetic Counselor. (n.d.). Retrieved June 29, 2015, from http://www.careerprofiles.info/genetic-counselor-career.html.
  5. Casini, A. (2016). Glass ceiling and glass elevator. The Wiley Blackwell encyclopedia of gender and sexuality studies. doi:  10.1002/9781118663219.wbegss262.
  6. Cherry, K. (n.d.). What is a genetics counselor? .Retrieved June 29, 2015, from http://psychology.about.com/od/ psychologycareerprofiles/ a/genetics-counselor.htm
  7. Chusmir, L. H. (1983). Characteristics and predictive dimensions of women who make nontraditional vocational choices. The Personnel and Guidance Journal, 62(1), 43–47. doi: 10.1111/j.2164-4918.1983.tb00118.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chusmir, L. H. (1990). Men who make nontraditional career choices. Journal of Counseling & Development, 69(1), 11–16. doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6676.1990.tb01446.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dodson, T. A., & Borders, L. A. (2006). Men in traditional and nontraditional careers: gender role attitudes, gender role conflict, and job satisfaction. The Career Development Quarterly, 54(4), 283–296. doi: 10.1002/j.2161-0045.2006.tb00194.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Giarelli, E., & Tulman, L. (2003). Methodological issues in the use of published cartoon data. Qualitative Health Research, 13, 945–956.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gottfredson, L. (2002). Gottfredson’s theory of circumscription, compromise, and self-creation. In D. Brown (Ed.), Career choice and development (pp. 85–148). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  12. Heikes, E. J. (1991). When men are the minority: the case of men in nursing. The Sociological Quarterly, 32(3), 389–401. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.1991.tb00165.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heppner, M. J., & Heppner, P. P. (2009). On men and work: taking the road less traveled. Journal of Career Development, 36(1), 49–67. doi: 10.1177/0894845309340789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hill, C. E., Thompson, B. J., & Nutt-Williams, E. N. (1997). A guide to conducting consensual qualitative research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 25, 517–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hill, C. E., Knox, S., Thompson, B. J., Williams, E. N., Hess, S. A., & Ladany, N. (2005). Consensual qualitative research: an update. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 196–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Holland, J. L. (1959). A theory of vocational choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 6(1), 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Holland, J. L. (1962). Some explorations of a theory of vocational choice: I. One-and two-year longitudinal studies. Psychological Monographs, 76(26), 1–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Holland, J. L. (1982). The SDS helps both females and males: a comment. Vocational Guidance Quarterly, 30(3), 195–197. doi: 10.1002/j.2164-585X.1982.tb00524.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. IOM. (2004). In the nation’s compelling interest: ensuring diversity in the health-care workforce. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine.Google Scholar
  20. Khan, S., & VanWynsberghe, R. (2008). Cultivating the under-mined: cross-case analysis as knowledge mobilization. Qualitative Social Research: Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum.Google Scholar
  21. Kopesky, J. W., Veach, P. M., Lian, F., & Leroy, B. S. (2011). Where are the males? Gender differences in undergraduates’ interest in and perceptions of the genetic counseling profession. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 20(4), 341–354. doi: 10.1007/s10897-011-9365-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kumaravel, S. N., Schneider, K. W., Cohen, S. A., Poole, A. M., Zimmmerman, H. (2014). Professional Status Survey: Executive Summary.Google Scholar
  23. La Rocco, S. A. (2007). Retention and recruitment of men in nursing. In C. O’Lynn & R. E. Tranbarger (Eds.), Men in nursing: history, challenges, and opportunities (pp. 241–254). New York: Springer Publishing Co..Google Scholar
  24. Lega, M., Veach, P. M., Ward, E. E., & Leroy, B. S. (2005). Who are the next generation of genetic counselors? A survey of students. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14(5), 395–407. doi: 10.1007/s10897-005-3773-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Medline Plus: Genetic Counseling (2014).Google Scholar
  26. Miranda, C., Veach, P., & Martyr, M. (2015). Portrait of the master genetic counselor clinician: a qualitative investigation of expertise in genetic counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 25(4), 767–785.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Mittman, I. S., & Downs, K. (2008). Diversity in genetic counseling: past, present and future. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 17(4), 301–313. doi: 10.1007/s10897-008-9160-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Oh, T., & Lewis, L. J. (2005). Consideration of genetic counseling as a career: implications for diversifying the genetic counseling field. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14(1), 71–81. doi: 10.1007/s10897-005-1501-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Owens, T. A., Tabangin, M. E., Huether, C. A., Vice Bowling, B., & Steinberg Warren, N. (2009). High school biology/life science teachers’ presentation of genetic counseling and health care career options in their classrooms. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 18, 275–286.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Pirzadeh, S. M., McCarthy Veach, P., Bartels, D. M., Kao, J., & Leroy, B. S. (2007). A national survey of genetic counselors’ personal values. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16(6), 763–773. doi: 10.1007/s10897-007-9108-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Powell, G., & Butterfield, D. (2003). Gender, gender identity, and aspirations to top management. Women in Management Review, 18(1/2), 88–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rolfe, H. (2006). Where are the men? Gender segregation in the childcare and early years sector. National Institute Economic Review, 195(1), 103–117. doi: 10.1177/0027950106064038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schoonveld, K. C., Veach, P. M., & LeRoy, B. S. (2007). What is it like to be in the minority? Ethnic and gender diversity in the genetic counseling profession. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16(1), 53–69. doi: 10.1007/s10897-006-9045-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Simpson, R. (2004). Masculinity at work: the experiences of men in female dominated occupations. Work, Employment and Society, 18(2), 349–368. doi: 10.1177/09500172004042773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Simpson, R. (2005). Men in non-traditional occupations: career entry, career orientation and experience of role strain. Gender, Work and Organization, 12(4), 363–380. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2005.00278.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Smith, R. A. (2012). Money, benefits, and power: a test of the glass ceiling and glass escalator hypotheses. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 639, 149–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sue, D. W., Capodilupo, C. M., Torino, G. C., Bucceri, J. M., Holder, A. M. B., Nadal, K. L., & Esquilin, M. (2007). Racial microaggressions in everyday life: implications for clinical practice. American Psychologist, 62(4), 271–286.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Thurtle, V., Hammond, S., & Jennings, P. (1998). The experience of students in a gender minority on courses at a college of higher and further education. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 50(4), 629–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Annual Averages.(2008). Website – Quick Facts on Nontraditional Occupations for Women. https://www.dol.gov/wb/factsheets/nontra2008.htm Accessed 7 Feb 2017.
  41. Warren, N., Callanan, N., & Leroy, B. (2005). "Nontraditional" is the new "mainstream" in genetic counseling. Perspectives in Genetic Counseling, 27(4), 4.Google Scholar
  42. Wells, D., Veach, P., & Martyr, M. (2016). Development, experience, and expression of meaning in genetic counselors’ lives: an exploratory analysis. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 25(4), 799–817.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Williams, C. (1992). The glass escalator: hidden advantages for men in the “female” professions. Social Problems, 39(3), 253–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Williams, C. (Ed.) (1993). Doing women’s work: men in non-traditional occupations. London: Sage. Is this a repeated citation on purpose (same as one below)?.Google Scholar
  45. Williams, S. L., & Villemez, W. J. (1993). Seekers and Finders. In C. L. Williams (Ed.), Doing women’s work: men in nontraditional occupations (pp. 64–90). Newbury Park: SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wolfe Schneider, K., Collins, R., Huether, C., & Steinberg Warren, N. (2009). A cross sectional study exploring factors impacting recruitment of African American college students into the genetic counseling profession. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 18, 494–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zahm, K. W., Veach, P. M., Martyr, M. A., & LeRoy, B. S. (2016). From novice to seasoned practitioner: a qualitative investigation of genetic counselor professional development. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 25(4), 818–834. doi: 10.1007/s10897-015-9900-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Zimmerman, H., Baggett, L. M., Cohen, L., Cohen, S. A. (2014). Professional status survey: work environment.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© National Society of Genetic Counselors, Inc. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, and DevelopmentUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  2. 2.Department of Genetic CounselingUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations