Patients’ Attitudes Towards Disclosure of Genetic Test Results to Family Members: The Impact of Patients’ Sociodemographic Background and Counseling Experience
- 834 Downloads
Many factors predict the intention to disclose genetic information to relatives. The article examines the impact of patients’ socio-demographic factors on their intention to disclose genetic testing results to their relatives. Data were collected in eight genetic clinics in Israel. Patients were requested to fill in a questionnaire after counseling. A convenience sample of 564 participants who visited these clinics was collected for a response rate of 85 %. Of them, 282 participants came for susceptibility testing for hereditary cancers (cancer group), and 282 for genetic screening tests (prenatal group). In the cancer group, being secular and having more years of education correlated positively with the intention to disclose test results to relatives. In the prenatal group, being married and female correlated positively with the intention to disclose. In the cancer group, being religious and with less years of education correlated positively with the view that the clinician should deliver the results to the family. In the prenatal group, being male and unmarried correlated positively with this belief. In both groups, being of young age correlated with the perception that genetic information is private. Varied sociodemographic factors affect the intention to inform family members. Thus, knowing the social background of patients will shed light on people’s attitudes to genetic information and will help clinicians provide effective counseling in discussions with patients about the implications of test results for relatives.
KeywordsGenetic information Disclosure Relatives Israel Family
The study was funded by the Israel Cancer Association and the International Society of Nurses in Genetics.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.
- Hashiloni-Dolev, Y. (2006). Between mothers, foetuses and society: Reproductive genetics in the Israeli Jewish context. Nashim: A Journal of Jewish Women’s Studies and Gender Issues, 12(fall), 129–150.Google Scholar
- Israel Central Bureau of Statistics, demographic data (2012). https://doi.org/www.cbs.gov.il/publications13/seker_hevrati11/pdf/intro_h.pdf. Accessed 16/2/2015.
- Jewish Genetics (2015). https://doi.org/www.jewishgenetics.org/dor-yeshorim. Accessed 16/2/2015.
- Koehly, L. M., Peterson, S. K., Watts, B. G., Kempf, K. K., Versnon, S. W., & Gritz, E. R. (2003). A social network analysis of communication about hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer genetic testing and family functioning. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 12(4), 304–313.Google Scholar
- Koehly, L. M., Peters, J. A., Kenen, R., Hoskins, L. M., Ersig, A. L., Kuhn, N. R., et al. (2009). Characteristics of health information gatherers, disseminators, and blockers within families at risk of hereditary cancer: implications for family health communication interventions. American Journal of Public Health, 99(12), 2203–2209.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Levin, M. (2013). Ethical, cultural and religious aspects of hereditary cancer in Jewish communities. Cancer Therapy, 1, 263–268.Google Scholar
- MacDonald, D., Sarna, L., van Servellen, G., Bastani, R., Gijer, J. N., & Weitzel, J. N. (2007). Selection of family members for communication of cancer risk and barriers to this communication before and after genetic cancer risk assessment. Genetics in Medicine, 9(5), 275–282.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ministry of Health (2004). Genetic testing- BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing, https://doi.org/www.health.gov.il/hozer/mr12_2004.pdf (Hebrew). Accessed 16/2/2015, Israel.
- Ministry of Health (2011). Genetic testing to identify at-risk couples for hereditary diseases in the Jewish population (Hebrew), https://doi.org/www.health.gov.il/genetics. Accessed 16/2/2015.
- Ministry of Health (2012). Prevention and early detection of malignant diseases, https://doi.org/www.health.gov.il/hozer/mk10_2012.pdf (Hebrew). Accessed 16/2/2015, Israel.
- Mozersky, J. (2013). Risky genes: Genetics, breast cancer and Jewish identity. UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Peters, J. A., Kenen, R., Hoskins, L. M., Koehly, L. M., Graubard, B., Loud, J. T., et al. (2011). Unpacking the blockers: understanding perceptions and social constraints of health communication in hereditary breast ovarian cancer (HBOC) susceptibility families. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 20(5), 450–464.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- van Oostrom, I., Meijers-Heijboer, H., Duivenvoorden, H. J., Bröcker-Vriends, A. H., van Asperen, C. J., Sijmons, R. H., et al. (2007). Family system characteristics and psychological adjustment to cancer susceptibility genetic testing: a prospective study. Clinical Genetics, 71(1), 35–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar