Randomized Trial of Telegenetics vs. In-Person Cancer Genetic Counseling: Cost, Patient Satisfaction and Attendance
- 956 Downloads
Telegenetics—genetic counseling via live videoconferencing—can improve access to cancer genetic counseling (CGC) in underserved areas, but studies on cancer telegenetics have not applied randomized methodology or assessed cost. We report cost, patient satisfaction and CGC attendance from a randomized trial comparing telegenetics with in-person CGC among individuals referred to CGC in four rural oncology clinics. Participants (n = 162) were randomized to receive CGC at their local oncology clinic in-person or via telegenetics. Cost analyses included telegenetics system; mileage; and personnel costs for genetic counselor, IT specialist, and clinic personnel. CGC attendance was tracked via study database. Patient satisfaction was assessed 1 week post-CGC via telephone survey using validated scales. Total costs were $106 per telegenetics patient and $244 per in-person patient. Patient satisfaction did not differ by group on either satisfaction scale. In-person patients were significantly more likely to attend CGC than telegenetics patients (89 vs. 79 %, p = 0.03), with bivariate analyses showing an association between lesser computer comfort and lower attendance rate (Chi-square = 5.49, p = 0.02). Our randomized trial of telegenetics vs. in-person counseling found that telegenetics cost less than in-person counseling, with high satisfaction among those who attended. This study provides support for future randomized trials comparing multiple service delivery models on longer-term psychosocial and behavioral outcomes.
KeywordsGenetic counseling Telemedicine Cancer genes Cost analysis Patient satisfaction
The authors wish to thank the Duke Cancer Network and participating clinics for their support of this study, and of genetic counseling in underserved communities.
The study described here was supported by grant DISP0707781 from Susan G. Komen for the Cure, which had no role in the design of the study described here or in the development or approval of this manuscript. Portions of the salaries of Mr. Buchanan, Drs. Datta, Hollowell, and Adams, and Mr. Beresford, Mr. Freeland, Mr. Rogers, and Mr. Boling were funded by this grant. Drs. Skinner and Marcom did not receive salary or other support from this grant.
This manuscript was made possible by Grant Number 1 UL1 RR024128-01 from the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and NIH Roadmap for Medical Research. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of NCRR or NIH.
Conflict of Interest
Mr. Buchanan’s work has been funded by the NIH. Dr. Datta’s work has been funded by the Department of Defense and VA Health Services Research & Development. Dr. Skinner’s work has been funded by the NIH and the Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas. Dr. Hollowell’s work has been funded by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. Mr. Rogers’ work has been funded by the Alpha-1 Foundation. Dr. Marcom’s work has been funded by the NIH and Department of Defense. Dr. Adams has served as a consultant to Sanofi, Drexel University, CustomID and MED-IQ. The authors declare that these relationships are not directly or indirectly related to the research described in this manuscript.
Human Studies and Informed Consent
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
- American College of Surgeons (2012). Cancer program standards 2012: Ensuring patient-centered care. Retrieved from http://www.facs.org.
- Berry, D. A., Iversen, E. S., Jr., Gudbjartsson, D. F., Hiller, E. H., Garber, J. E., Peshkin, B. N., Lerman, C., Watson, P., Lynch, H. T., Hilsenbeck, S. G., Rubinstein, W. S., Hughes, K. S., & Parmigiani, G. (2002). BRCAPRO validation, sensitivity of genetic testing of BRCA1/BRCA2, and prevalence of other breast cancer susceptibility genes. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 20(11), 2701–2712.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen, S., Wang, W., Lee, S., Nafa, K., Lee, J., Romans, K., Watson, P., Gruber, S. B., Euhus, D., Kinzler, K. W., Jass, J., Gallinger, S., Lindor, N. M., Casey, G., Ellis, N., Giardiello, F. M., Offit, K., Parmigiani, G., & Colon Cancer Family, R. (2006). Prediction of germline mutations and cancer risk in the Lynch syndrome. JAMA, 296(12), 1479–1487.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Coelho, J. J., Arnold, A., Nayler, J., Tischkowitz, M., & MacKay, J. (2005). An assessment of the efficacy of cancer genetic counselling using real-time videoconferencing technology (telemedicine) compared to face-to-face consultations. European Journal of Cancer, 41(15), 2257–2261.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- d’Agincourt-Canning, L., McGillivray, B., Panabaker, K., Scott, J., Pearn, A., Ridge, Y., & Portigal-Todd, C. (2008). Evaluation of genetic counseling for hereditary cancer by videoconference in British Columbia. British Columbia Medical Journal, 50(10), 554–559.Google Scholar
- Daly, M., Axilbund, J., Bryant, E., Buys, S., Esserman, L., Farrell, C., et al. (2008). NCCN practice guidelines in oncology: Genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast and ovarian. Version 1.2008. Retrieved Feb 11, 2011, from http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/genetics_screening.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb 2011.
- Drummond, M. F., O'Brien, B. J., Stoddart, G. L., & Torrance, G. W. (1999). Chapter 4: Cost analysis. In Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hammers, E. (2009). Innovations in service delivery in the age of genomics: Workshop summary. Washington, D. C.: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
- Hughes, C., Lerman, C., Schwartz, M., Peshkin, B., Wenzel, L., Narod, S., Corio, C., Tercyak, K. P., Hanna, D., Main, D., & Isaacs, C. (2002). All in the family: Evaluation of the processand content of sisters’ communication about BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic test results. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 107, 143–150.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schwartz, M. D., Lerman, C., Brogan, B., Peshkin, B. N., Halbert, C. H., DeMarco, T., et al. (2004). Impact of BRCA1/BRCA2 counseling and testing on newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 22(10), 1823–1829.Google Scholar
- Schwartz, M. D., Valdimarsdottir, H. B., Peshkin, B. N., Mandelblatt, J., Nusbaum, R., Huang, A. T., Chang, Y., Graves, K., Isaacs, C., Wood, M., McKinnon, W., Garber, J., McCormick, S., Kinney, A. Y., Luta, G., Kelleher, S., Leventhal, K.-G., Vegella, P., Tong, A., & King, L. (2014). Randomized noninferiority trial of telephone versus in-person genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 32(7), 618–626.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Trepanier, A., Ahrens, M., McKinnon, W., Peters, J., Stopfer, J., Grumet, S. C., Manley, S., Culver, J. O., Acton, R., Larsen-Haidle, J., Correia, L. A., Bennett, R., Pettersen, B., Ferlita, T. D., Costalas, J. W., Hunt, K., Donlon, S., Skrzynia, C., Farrell, C., Callif-Daley, F., Vockley, C. W., & National Society of Genetic, C. (2004). Genetic cancer risk assessment and counseling: recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 13(2), 83–114.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- U.S. Census Bureau (2010). North Carolina QuickFacts. 2010 Census of Population and Housing, Demographic Profile,. Retrieved May 10, 2013, from http://www.quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/37000.html.
- U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (2006). Coverage and reimbursement of genetic tests and services: Report of the Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Genetics, Health, and Society. http://oba.od.nih.gov/oba/sacghs/reports/CR_report.pdf.
- Zilliacus, E. M., Meiser, B., Lobb, E. A., Kelly, P. J., Barlow-Stewart, K., Kirk, J. A., Spigelman, A. D., Warwick, L. J., & Tucker, K. M. (2011). Are videoconferenced consultations as effective as face-to-face consultations for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genetic counseling? Genetics in Medicine, 13(11), 933–941.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar