Genetic Counseling and the Ethical Issues Around Direct to Consumer Genetic Testing
Over the last several years, direct to consumer (DTC) genetic testing has received increasing attention in the public, healthcare and academic realms. DTC genetic testing companies face considerable criticism and scepticism, particularly from the medical and genetic counseling community. This raises the question of what specific aspects of DTC genetic testing provoke concerns, and conversely, promises, for genetic counselors. This paper addresses this question by exploring DTC genetic testing through an ethical lens. By considering the fundamental ethical approaches influencing genetic counseling (the ethic of care and principle-based ethics) we highlight the specific ethical concerns raised by DTC genetic testing companies. Ultimately, when considering the ethics of DTC testing in a genetic counseling context, we should think of it as a balancing act. We need careful and detailed consideration of the risks and troubling aspects of such testing, as well as the potentially beneficial direct and indirect impacts of the increased availability of DTC genetic testing. As a result it is essential that genetic counselors stay informed and involved in the ongoing debate about DTC genetic testing and DTC companies. Doing so will ensure that the ethical theories and principles fundamental to the profession of genetic counseling are promoted not just in traditional counseling sessions, but also on a broader level. Ultimately this will help ensure that the public enjoys the benefits of an increasingly genetic-based healthcare system.
KeywordsDirect to consumer genetic testing Ethics Genetic Counseling Values
- ACMG (2004). ACMG statement on direct-to-consumer genetic testing. Genetics in Medicine, 6(1), 60.Google Scholar
- Beauchamp, T., & Childress, J. (2009). Principles of biomedical ethics. USA: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Bloss, C. S., Topol, E. J., & Schork, N. J. (2011). Association of direct-to-consumer genome-wide disease risk estimates and self-reported disease. Genetic Epidemiology. doi:10.1002/gepi.20664.
- Brice, P. (2010). Current DTC genetic testing market smaller than expected. http://www.phgfoundation.org/news/5658/. Accessed May 30 2011.
- Gillon, R. (1986). Philosophical Medical Ethics. Wiley and Son.Google Scholar
- Janssens, A. C., Gwinn, M., Bradley, L. A., Oostra, B. A., van Duijn, C. M., & Khoury, M. J. (2008). A critical appraisal of the scientific basis of commercial genomic profiles used to assess health risks and personalize health interventions. American Journal Human Genetics, 82(3), 593–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Karns, L., Roche, M., & Yashar, B. (2005). An ethics casebook for genetic counselors, 2nd Edition: Ethical discourse for the practice of genetic counseling. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Miller, R. (1996). Casuistry and modern ethics: A poetics of practical reasoning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- NSGC (2006). Code of Ethics. http://www.nsgc.org/Advocacy/NSGCCodeofEthics/tabid/155/Default.aspx. Accessed May 20, 2011.
- Salkin, A. (2008). When in Doubt, Spit It Out. (Sep 14th). New York Times.Google Scholar
- Schmerler, S. (1999). Ethical and legal issues. In D. Baker, J. Schuette, & W. Uhlmann (Eds.), A guide to genetic counseling. New York: Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
- Wade, C. H., & Wilfond, B. S. (2006). Ethical and clinical practice considerations for genetic counselors related to direct to consumer marketing of genetic tests. Journal of Medical Genetics, 142(4), 284–292.Google Scholar
- Weil, J. (2000). Psychosocial genetic counseling. USA: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar