Family Physicians’ Awareness and Knowledge of the Genetic Information Non-Discrimination Act (GINA)
- 561 Downloads
Historically, physicians have expressed concern about their patients’ risk of genetic discrimination, which has acted as a barrier to uptake of genetic services. The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA) is intended to protect patients against employer and health insurance discrimination. Physicians’ awareness and knowledge of GINA has yet to be evaluated. In 2009, we mailed surveys to 1500 randomly selected members of the American Academy of Family Physicians. Questions measured physicians’ current knowledge of GINA and their level of concern for genetic discrimination. In total, 401 physicians completed the survey (response rate 26.9%). Approximately half (54.5%) of physicians had no awareness of GINA. Of physicians who reported basic knowledge of GINA, the majority were aware of the protections offered for group health insurance (92.7%), private health insurance (82.9%), and employment (70.7%). Fewer physicians were aware of GINA’s limitations regarding life insurance (53.7%) and long-term care insurance (58.8%). Physicians demonstrated highest levels of concern for health insurance, life insurance, and long-term care insurance discrimination, with less concern for employer and family/social discrimination. Level of concern for the risk of genetic discrimination did not correlate significantly with awareness of GINA. Approximately 17 months after GINA was signed into federal law, physicians’ knowledge remained limited regarding the existence of this legislation and relevant details. Physicians who are aware of GINA continue to have significant concerns regarding the risk of genetic discrimination. This study reveals the need to further educate physicians about the existence of GINA and the protections offered.
KeywordsGINA Genetic Discrimination Genetic testing Insurance Government regulation Genetic privacy
- Associated Press (April 28, 2010). Conn. woman alleges genetic discrimination at work. Boston Herald.com. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/www.bostonherald.com/news/national/northeast/view/20100428conn_woman_alleges_genetic_discrimination_at_work/srvc=home&position=recent
- Domchek, S. M., Friebel, T. M., Singer, C. F., Evans, D. G., Lynch, H. T., Isaacs, C., et al. (2010). Association of risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with cancer risk and mortality. JAMA, 304(9), 967–975. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/GeneTests/static/whatsnew/labdirgrowth.shtml CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Erwin, C. (2009). Behind of Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008. American Journal of Nursing, 109(12).Google Scholar
- Gene Tests Database 2009. (1993–2010). National Institues of Health 2010. Retrieved from https://doi.org/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/GeneTests/static/whatsnew/labdirgrowth.shtml.
- Genetic Information: Legal Issues Relating to Discrimination and Privacy. (2010). Paper presented at the National Conference of State Legislatures. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/www.ncsl.org/default.aspx?tabid=14374.
- Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008, Information for Researchers and Health Care Professionals (2009). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/www.genome.gov/Pages/PolicyEthics/GeneticDiscrimination/GINAInfoDoc.pdf.
- Health law - genetics - Congress restricts use of genetic information by insurers and employers. - Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008, Harvard Law Review, 122(3), 1038–1045.Google Scholar
- Huizenga, C. R., Lowstuter, K., Banks, K. C., Lagos, V. I., Vandergon, V. O., & Weitzel, J. N. (2009). Evolving perspectives on genetic discrimination in health insurance among health care providers. Familial Cancer.Google Scholar
- Reilly, P. R. (1999). Efforts to regulate the collection and use of genetic information. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 123(11), 1066–1070.Google Scholar