Journal of Genetic Counseling

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 231–240 | Cite as

Teaching About Genetic Testing Issues in the Undergraduate Classroom: A Case Study

Case Presentation

Abstract

Educating undergraduates about current genetic testing and genomics can involve novel and creative teaching practices. The higher education literature describes numerous pedagogical approaches in the laboratory designed to engage science and liberal arts students. Often these experiences involve students analyzing their own genes for various polymorphisms, some of which are associated with disease states such as an increased risk for developing cancer. While the literature acknowledges possible ethical ramifications of such laboratory exercises, authors do not present recommendations or rubrics for evaluating whether or not the testing is, in fact, ethical. In response, we developed a laboratory investigation and discussion which allowed undergraduate science students to explore current DNA manipulation techniques to isolate their p53 gene, followed by a dialogue probing the ethical implications of examining their sample for various polymorphisms. Students never conducted genotyping on their samples because of ethical concerns, so the discussion served to replace actual genetic testing in the class. A basic scientist led the laboratory portion of the assignment. A genetic counselor facilitated the discussion, which centered around existing ethical guidelines for clinical genetic testing and possible challenges of human genotyping outside the medical setting. In their final papers, students demonstrated an understanding of the practice guidelines established by the genetics community and acknowledged the ethical considerations inherent in p53 genotyping. Given the burgeoning market for personalized medicine, teaching undergraduates about the psychosocial and ethical dimensions of human gene testing seems important and timely, and introduces an additional role genetic counselors can play in educating consumers about genomics.

Keywords

Code of ethics Genetic testing Undergraduate Genotyping Genetic counselor Genomics Education Ethical dilemmas 

References

  1. Baumiller, R. C., Cunningham, G., Fisher, N., Fox, L., Henderson, M., Lebel, R., et al. (1996). Code of ethical principles for genetics professionals: an explication. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 65, 179–183.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benkendorf, J., Callanan, N. P., Grobstein, R., Schmerler, S., & FitzGerald, K. T. (1992). An explication of the national society of genetic counselors (NSGC) code of ethics. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 1, 31–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennett, R. L., Callanan, N., Gordon, E., Karns, L., Mooney, K. H., Ruzicka, R., et al. (2006). Code of ethics of the national society of genetic counselors: explication of revisions. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15, 313–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berliner, J. L., & Fay, A. M. (2007). Risk assessment and genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: recommendations of the national society of genetic counselors. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16, 241–260.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brooks, P. J., Enoch, M. A., Goldman, D., Li, T. K., & Yokoyama, A. (2009). The alcohol flushing response: an unrecognized risk factor for esophageal cancer from alcohol consumption. PLoS Medicine, 6(3), e1000050. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Collins, F. S., Green, E. D., Guttmacher, A. E., & Guyer, M. S. (2003). A vision for the future of genomics research. Nature, 422, 835–847.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fan, R., Wu, M. T., Miller, D., Wain, J. C., Kelsey, K. T., Wiencke, J. K., et al. (2000). The p53 codon 72 polymorphism and lung cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 9, 1037–1042.Google Scholar
  8. Harris, C. C. (1993). At the crossroads of molecular carcinogenesis and risk assessment. Science, 262, 1980–1981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Herrero, S., Ivorra, J. L., Garcia-Sogo, M., & Martinez-Cortina, C. (2008). Biochemistry and molecular biology techniques for person characterization. Bambed, 36, 347–353.Google Scholar
  10. Hollstein, M., Sidransky, D., Vogelstein, B., & Harris, C. C. (1991). p53 mutations in human cancers. Science, 253, 49–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jabr, F. (2010). Exposing the student body: Stanford joins U.C. Berkeley in controversial genetic testing of students. Scientific American. Retrieved August 26, 2010, from http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=exposing-the-student-body.
  12. Jackson, D. D., Abbey, C. S., & Nugent, D. (2006). DNA profiling of the D1S80 locus: a forensic analysis for the undergraduate biochemistry laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education, 83, 774–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lewin, T. (2010). College bound, DNA swab in hand. The New York Times. Retrieved August 26, 2010, from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/19/education/19dna.html?_r=1.
  14. Little, K. Y., Krolewski, D. M., Zhang, L., & Cassin, B. J. (2003). Loss of striatal vesicular monoamine transporter protein (VMAT2) in human cocaine users. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 47–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lubin, I. M., Wilson, B., & Grant, K. B. (2003). Allele-specific polymerase chain reaction-based genotyping of a normal variation in human color vision. Journal of Chemical Education, 80, 1289–1291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Martin, M. P., & Detzel, S. M. (2008). A laboratory exercise to determine human ABO blood type by noninvasive methods. Bambed, 36, 139–146.Google Scholar
  17. McKinnon, W. C., Baty, B. J., Bennett, R. L., Magee, M., Neufeld-Kaiser, W. A., Peters, K. F., et al. (1997). Predisposition genetic testing for late-onset disorders in adults: a position paper of the national society of genetic counselors. JAMA, 15, 1217–1220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McNamara-Schroeder, K., Olonan, C., Chu, S., Montoya, M. C., Alviri, M., Ginty, S., et al. (2006). DNA fingerprinting analysis of three short tandem repeat (STR) loci for biochemistry and forensic science laboratory courses. Bambed, 34, 378–383.Google Scholar
  19. Millard, J. T., & Pilon, A. M. (2003). Identification of forensic samples via mitochondrial DNA in the undergraduate biochemistry laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education, 80, 444–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nature.com (August 12, 2010). State halts UC Berkeley’s gene testing plans. Retrieved August 26, 2010 from http://blogs.nature.com/news/thegreatbeyond/2010/08/state_halts_uc_berkeleys_gene_1.html.
  21. NIAAA.nih.gov (September 23, 2010). NIAAA director’s report on Institute Activities, news media interactions. Retrived December 10, 2010 fromhttp://www.niaaa.nih.gov/AboutNIAAA/AdvisoryCouncil/DirectorsReports/Pages/director_report-92310.aspx.
  22. NSGC (August 12, 2010). Statement from the national society of genetic counselors regarding UC Berkeley’s genetic testing program. Retrieved August 26, 2010, from http://www.nsgc.org/.
  23. On the Same Page (2010). Bring Your Genes to Cal. Retrieved August 26, 2010 from http://onthesamepage.berkeley.edu/.
  24. Ouyang, L., Ge, C., Wu, H., Li, S., & Zhang, H. (2009). PCR-RFLP to detect codon 248 mutation in exon 7 of p53 tumor suppressor gene. Bambed, 37, 106–109.Google Scholar
  25. Pardinas, A. F., Dopico, E., Roca, A., Garcia-Vasquez, E., & Lopez, B. (2010). Introducing human population biology through an easy laboratory exercise on mitochondrial DNA. Bambed, 38, 110–115.Google Scholar
  26. PBS Extra (August 18, 2010). U-C Berkeley forced to abandon genetic testing for new students. Retrieved August 26, 2010 from http://www.pbs.org/newshour/extra/features/health/july-dec10/berkeley_08-19.html.
  27. Salerno, T. A. (2009). Development of a laboratory project to determine human ABO genotypes—limitations lead to further student explorations. Bambed, 37, 361–368.Google Scholar
  28. Schneider, K. (2002). Counseling about cancer, strategies for genetic counselors (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley-Liss.Google Scholar
  29. Silveira, L. A. (2008). Experimenting with spirituality: analyzing the god gene in a nonmajors laboratory course. Life Sciences Educational, 7, 132–145.Google Scholar
  30. Soto-Cruz, I., & Legorreta-Herrera, M. (2009). Analysis of a p53 mutation associated with cancer susceptibility for biochemistry and genetic laboratory courses. Bambed, 37, 236–242.Google Scholar
  31. Storey, A., Thomas, M., Kalita, A., Harwood, C., Gardiol, D., Mantoviani, F., et al. (1998). Role of a p53 polymorphism in the development of human papillomavirus-associated cancer. Nature, 393, 229–234.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Trepanier, A., Ahrens, M., McKinnon, W., Peters, J., Stopfer, J., Campbell Grumet, S., et al. (2004). Genetic cancer risk assessment and counseling: recommendations of the national society of genetic counselors. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 13, 83–114.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Weinlander, K. M., & Hall, D. J. (2010). Designing laboratory exercises for the undergraduate molecular biology/biochemistry student: techniques and ethical implications involved in personalized medicine. Bambed, 38, 180–187.Google Scholar
  34. Weinlander, K. M., Hall, D. J., & DeStasio, A. (2010). RFLP analysis and allelic discrimination with real-time PCR using the human lactase persistence trait: a pair molecular genetic investigations. Bambed, 38, 180–187.Google Scholar
  35. Zhu, Y., Brown, H. N., Zhang, Y., Stevens, R. G., & Zheng, T. (2005). Period3 structural variation: a circadian biomarker associated with breast cancer in young women. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 14, 268–270.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© National Society of Genetic Counselors, Inc. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pre-health AdvisingWabash CollegeCrawfordsvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryWabash CollegeCrawfordsvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations