Teaching About Genetic Testing Issues in the Undergraduate Classroom: A Case Study
- 339 Downloads
Educating undergraduates about current genetic testing and genomics can involve novel and creative teaching practices. The higher education literature describes numerous pedagogical approaches in the laboratory designed to engage science and liberal arts students. Often these experiences involve students analyzing their own genes for various polymorphisms, some of which are associated with disease states such as an increased risk for developing cancer. While the literature acknowledges possible ethical ramifications of such laboratory exercises, authors do not present recommendations or rubrics for evaluating whether or not the testing is, in fact, ethical. In response, we developed a laboratory investigation and discussion which allowed undergraduate science students to explore current DNA manipulation techniques to isolate their p53 gene, followed by a dialogue probing the ethical implications of examining their sample for various polymorphisms. Students never conducted genotyping on their samples because of ethical concerns, so the discussion served to replace actual genetic testing in the class. A basic scientist led the laboratory portion of the assignment. A genetic counselor facilitated the discussion, which centered around existing ethical guidelines for clinical genetic testing and possible challenges of human genotyping outside the medical setting. In their final papers, students demonstrated an understanding of the practice guidelines established by the genetics community and acknowledged the ethical considerations inherent in p53 genotyping. Given the burgeoning market for personalized medicine, teaching undergraduates about the psychosocial and ethical dimensions of human gene testing seems important and timely, and introduces an additional role genetic counselors can play in educating consumers about genomics.
KeywordsCode of ethics Genetic testing Undergraduate Genotyping Genetic counselor Genomics Education Ethical dilemmas
- Fan, R., Wu, M. T., Miller, D., Wain, J. C., Kelsey, K. T., Wiencke, J. K., et al. (2000). The p53 codon 72 polymorphism and lung cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 9, 1037–1042.Google Scholar
- Herrero, S., Ivorra, J. L., Garcia-Sogo, M., & Martinez-Cortina, C. (2008). Biochemistry and molecular biology techniques for person characterization. Bambed, 36, 347–353.Google Scholar
- Jabr, F. (2010). Exposing the student body: Stanford joins U.C. Berkeley in controversial genetic testing of students. Scientific American. Retrieved August 26, 2010, from http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=exposing-the-student-body.
- Lewin, T. (2010). College bound, DNA swab in hand. The New York Times. Retrieved August 26, 2010, from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/19/education/19dna.html?_r=1.
- Martin, M. P., & Detzel, S. M. (2008). A laboratory exercise to determine human ABO blood type by noninvasive methods. Bambed, 36, 139–146.Google Scholar
- McNamara-Schroeder, K., Olonan, C., Chu, S., Montoya, M. C., Alviri, M., Ginty, S., et al. (2006). DNA fingerprinting analysis of three short tandem repeat (STR) loci for biochemistry and forensic science laboratory courses. Bambed, 34, 378–383.Google Scholar
- Nature.com (August 12, 2010). State halts UC Berkeley’s gene testing plans. Retrieved August 26, 2010 from http://blogs.nature.com/news/thegreatbeyond/2010/08/state_halts_uc_berkeleys_gene_1.html.
- NIAAA.nih.gov (September 23, 2010). NIAAA director’s report on Institute Activities, news media interactions. Retrived December 10, 2010 fromhttp://www.niaaa.nih.gov/AboutNIAAA/AdvisoryCouncil/DirectorsReports/Pages/director_report-92310.aspx.
- NSGC (August 12, 2010). Statement from the national society of genetic counselors regarding UC Berkeley’s genetic testing program. Retrieved August 26, 2010, from http://www.nsgc.org/.
- On the Same Page (2010). Bring Your Genes to Cal. Retrieved August 26, 2010 from http://onthesamepage.berkeley.edu/.
- Ouyang, L., Ge, C., Wu, H., Li, S., & Zhang, H. (2009). PCR-RFLP to detect codon 248 mutation in exon 7 of p53 tumor suppressor gene. Bambed, 37, 106–109.Google Scholar
- Pardinas, A. F., Dopico, E., Roca, A., Garcia-Vasquez, E., & Lopez, B. (2010). Introducing human population biology through an easy laboratory exercise on mitochondrial DNA. Bambed, 38, 110–115.Google Scholar
- PBS Extra (August 18, 2010). U-C Berkeley forced to abandon genetic testing for new students. Retrieved August 26, 2010 from http://www.pbs.org/newshour/extra/features/health/july-dec10/berkeley_08-19.html.
- Salerno, T. A. (2009). Development of a laboratory project to determine human ABO genotypes—limitations lead to further student explorations. Bambed, 37, 361–368.Google Scholar
- Schneider, K. (2002). Counseling about cancer, strategies for genetic counselors (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley-Liss.Google Scholar
- Silveira, L. A. (2008). Experimenting with spirituality: analyzing the god gene in a nonmajors laboratory course. Life Sciences Educational, 7, 132–145.Google Scholar
- Soto-Cruz, I., & Legorreta-Herrera, M. (2009). Analysis of a p53 mutation associated with cancer susceptibility for biochemistry and genetic laboratory courses. Bambed, 37, 236–242.Google Scholar
- Weinlander, K. M., & Hall, D. J. (2010). Designing laboratory exercises for the undergraduate molecular biology/biochemistry student: techniques and ethical implications involved in personalized medicine. Bambed, 38, 180–187.Google Scholar
- Weinlander, K. M., Hall, D. J., & DeStasio, A. (2010). RFLP analysis and allelic discrimination with real-time PCR using the human lactase persistence trait: a pair molecular genetic investigations. Bambed, 38, 180–187.Google Scholar
- Zhu, Y., Brown, H. N., Zhang, Y., Stevens, R. G., & Zheng, T. (2005). Period3 structural variation: a circadian biomarker associated with breast cancer in young women. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 14, 268–270.Google Scholar