Biobanks: Importance, Implications and Opportunities for Genetic Counselors
- 853 Downloads
Biobanks are collections of human biological tissue specimens and related health data. Biobank research hopes to provide novel insights into the genetic component of disease, ultimately leading to a more personalized approach to healthcare. However, biobanks have sparked debate due to the ethical, legal, and social implications surrounding utilization of population samples and data. These controversies include issues of consent, privacy and confidentiality, return of results and data-sharing. This paper provides an overview of the different types and scope of biobanks and an examination of the most pertinent ethical, legal and social considerations surrounding such research, as well as how some of these concerns are being addressed. The paper finishes with a discussion of the relevance of biobanks to the genetic counseling field and concludes that genetic counselors are in a position to make a unique, educated and practical contribution to the ongoing dialogue and direction of biobank research.
KeywordsBiobanks Ethics Genetic counseling Advocacy
The author wishes to thank Professor Michael Burgess at UBC for introducing her to the complexities of biobank research, as well as Ushta Canteenwalla and the two anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions on previous versions of this manuscript.
- Australian Law Reform Commission. (2003). Essentially yours: The protection of human genetic information in Australia. Executive Summary Retrieved Jan 20th, 2010, from https://doi.org/www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/alrc/publications/reports/96/.
- Avard, D., Bucci, L., Burgess, M., Kaye, J., Heeney, C., Farmer, Y., et al. (2009). Public health genomics (PHG) and public participation: points to consider. Journal of Public Deliberation, 5(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
- Barr, M. (2006). I’m not really read up on genetics: biobanks and the social context of informed consent. Biosocieties, 1, 251–262.Google Scholar
- Bogert, G. G., & Bogert, G. T. (1992). The law of trusts and trustees. St. Paul: West.Google Scholar
- Boulton, M., & Parker, M. (2007). Informed consent in a changing environment. Social Science & Medicine, 65(11), 2187–2198.Google Scholar
- Brekke, O., & Sirnes, T. (2006). Population biobanks: the ethical gravity of informed consent. BioSocieties, 1, 385–398.Google Scholar
- Cambon-Thomsen, A. (2004). The social and ethical issues of post-genomic human biobanks. Nature Genetics, 5, 866–873.Google Scholar
- Cambon-Thomsen, A., Sallée, C., Rial-Sebbag, E., & Knoppers, B. (2005). Populational genetic databases is a specific ethical and legal framework necessary? GenEdit, 3(1), 1–13.Google Scholar
- Caulfield, T., & Ries, N. (2003). Consent, privacy and confidentiality in longitudinal, population health research: the Canadian legal context. Health Law Journal, 11, 1.Google Scholar
- Caulfield, T., McGuire, A., Cho, M., Buchanan, J., Burgess, M., Danilczyk, U., et al. (2008). Research Ethics recommendations for whole-genome research: consensus statement. PLoS Biology, 6(3), 73.Google Scholar
- CDC. (2007). 10 years of public health genomics at CDC 1997–2007. Retrieved Jan 13th, 2010, from https://doi.org/www.cdc.gov/genomics/about/reports/2007/index.htm.
- Foltz, F. (1999). Five arguments for increasing public participation in making science policy. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 19(2), 117–127.Google Scholar
- Genetic Alliance BioBank: Executive Summary. (2010). Retrieved Jan 15, 2010, from https://doi.org/www.biobank.org/english/view.asp?x=1364&id=76.
- Gottweis, H., & Petersen, A. (Eds.). (2008). Biobanks: Governance in comparative perspective. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Hoffman, B. (2009). Broadening consent and diluting ethics? Journal of Medical Ethics, 35, 125–129.Google Scholar
- Irwin, A. (2001). Constructing the scientific citizen: science and democracy in the biosciences. Public Understanding of Science, 10(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
- Kerr, A., Cunningham-Burley, S., & Tutton, R. (2007). Shifting subject positions: experts and lay people in public discourse. Social Studies of Science, 37(3), 385–411.Google Scholar
- MacNaghten, P., Kearnes, M. B., & Wynne, B. (2005). Nanotechnology, governance and public deliberation: what role for the social sciences? Science Communication, 27, 268–291.Google Scholar
- McCarty, C. A., Chapman-Stone, D., Derfus, T., Giampietro, P. F., & Fost, N. (2009). Community consultation and communication for a population-based DNA biobank: the Marshfield clinic personalized medicine research project. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 146A, 3026–3033.Google Scholar
- NSGC. (1983). Genetic counseling as a profession. Retrieved January 19th, 2010, from https://doi.org/www.nsgc.org/career/index.cfm#as_a_profession.
- OECD. (2006). Creation and governance of human genetic research databases.Google Scholar
- Park, A. (2009). Ten ideas changing the world right now. Time Magazine: US Edition, 173.Google Scholar
- Petersen, A. (2005). Securing our genetic health: engendering trust in UK Biobank. Sociology of Health & Illness, 27(2), 271–292.Google Scholar
- Petersen, A. (2007). Biobanks’ “engagements”: engendering trust or engineering consent? Genomics, Society and Policy, 3(1), 31–43.Google Scholar
- Pfendner, E. G., Vanakker, O. M., Terry, S. F., Vourthis, S., McAndrew, P. E., McClain, M. R., et al. (2007). Mutation detection in the ABCC6 gene and genotype phenotype analysis in a large international case series affected by pseudoxanthoma elasticum. British Medical Journal, 44(10), 621–628.Google Scholar
- Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2005). A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science, Technology & Human Values, 30(2), 251–290.Google Scholar
- Secko, D. M., Preto, N., Niemeyer, S., & Burgess, M. M. (2009). Informed consent in biobank research: a deliberative approach to the debate. Social Science & Medicine, 68(4), 781–789.Google Scholar
- Swen, J., Huizinga, T., Gelderblom, H., de Vries, E., Assendelft, W., Kirchheiner, J., et al. (2007). Translating pharmacogenomics: challenges on the road to the clinic. PLoS Medicine, 4(8), 1317–1324.Google Scholar
- Tutton, R., & Corrigan, O. (Eds.). (2004). Genetic databases: Socio-ethical issues in the collection and use of DNA. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- UK Biobank. (2009). Improving the health of future generations. Retrieved 15 Jan, 2010, from https://doi.org/www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/.
- Winickoff, D. (2006). Genome and nation: Iceland’s health sector database and its legacy. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 1(2), 80–105.Google Scholar
- Winickoff, D., & Winickoff, R. (2003). The charitable trust as a model for genomic biobanks. New England Journal of Medicine, 12, 1180–1184.Google Scholar