Advertisement

Journal of Genetic Counseling

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 217–227 | Cite as

Publishing a Master’s Thesis: A Guide for Novice Authors

  • Robert G. Resta
  • Patricia McCarthy Veach
  • Sarah Charles
  • Kristen Vogel
  • Terri Blase
  • Christina G. S. PalmerEmail author
Professional Issues

Abstract

Publication of original research, clinical experiences, and critical reviews of literature are vital to the growth of the genetic counseling field, delivery of genetic counseling services, and professional development of genetic counselors. Busy clinical schedules, lack of time and funding, and training that emphasizes clinical skills over research skills may make it difficult for new genetic counselors to turn their thesis projects into publications. This paper summarizes and elaborates upon a presentation aimed at de-mystifying the publishing process given at the 2008 National Society of Genetic Counselors Annual Education Conference. Specific topics include familiarizing prospective authors, particularly genetic counseling students, with the basics of the publication process and related ethical considerations. Former students’ experiences with publishing master’s theses also are described in hopes of encouraging new genetic counselors to submit for publication papers based on their thesis projects.

Keywords

Professionalization Publishing Journal writing Genetic counseling Publication ethics Master’s thesis Graduate training 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This paper was developed from an Educational Breakout Session (EBS) sponsored by the Jane Engelberg Memorial Fellowship Advisory Group at the 2008 NSGC Annual Education Conference.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. American Board of Genetic Counseling. 2009. Competencies. https://doi.org/www.abgc.net/english/view.asp?x=1529&all=true. Accessed October 26, 2009.
  2. Andersen, J., Belmont, J., & Cho, C. T. (2006). Journal impact factor in the era of expanding literature. Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection, 39, 436–443.Google Scholar
  3. Armstrong, A. W., Idriss, S. Z., Kimball, A. B., & Bernhard, J. D. (2008). Fate of manuscripts declined by the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 58, 632–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beeson, D. (1997). Nuance, complexity, and context: qualitative methods in genetic counseling research. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 6, 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benose, D. J., Bashari, E., Chaves, J. M., Gaggar, A., Kapoor, N., LaFrance, M., et al. (2007). The ups and downs of peer review. Advances in Physiology Education, 31, 145–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blase, T., Martinez, A., Grody, W. W., Schimmenti, L., & Palmer, C. G. S. (2007). Sharing GJB2/GJB6 genetic test information with family members. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16, 313–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowen, N. K. (2003). How to write a research article for the Journal of Genetic Counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 12, 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.Google Scholar
  9. Charles, S., Kessler, L., Stopfer, J. E., Domchek, S., & Halbert, C. H. (2006). Satisfaction with genetic counseling for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among African American women. Patient Education and Counseling, 63, 196–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chew, M., Villanueva, E. V., & Van Der Weyden, M. B. (2006). Life and times of the impact factor: retrospective analysis of trends for seven medical journals (1994–2005) and their editors’ views. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 100, 142–150.Google Scholar
  11. Clark, H. M., Gamm, J., Huether, C. A., Buncher, C. R., Blough Pfau, R. I., & Steinberg Warren, N. (2006). Genetic counselors and research: current practices and future directions. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C (Seminars in Medical Genetics), 142C, 276–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen, B. L., Friedman, E., & Zier, K. (2008). Publications by students doing a year of full-time research: what are realistic expectations? The American Journal of Medicine, 121, 545–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Curfman, G. D., Morrissey, S., Annas, G. J., & Drazen, J. M. (2008). Peer review in the balance. New England Journal of Medicine, 358, 2276–2277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Driscoll, J., & Driscoll, A. (2002). Writing an article for publication: an open invitation. Journal of Orthopaedic Nursing, 6, 144–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. East, J. (2006). The problem of plagiarism in academic culture. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2, 16–28.Google Scholar
  16. Fine, M. A., & Kurdek, L. A. (1993). Reflections on determining authorship credit and authorship order on faculty-student collaborations. American Psychologist, 48, 1141–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Garfield, E. (1994). The Thomson Scientific Impact Factor Thomson Reuters (formerly the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI)). https://doi.org/www.thomsonreuters.com/business_units/scientific/free/essays/impactfactor/. Accessed 1/24/2009.
  18. Gavey, N., & Braun, V. (1997). Ethics and the publication of clinical case material. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 28, 399–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gibelman, M., & Gelman, S. R. (1999). Who’s the author? Ethical issues in publishing. Journal of Social Work Education, 35, 203–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Greenwood, D. C. (2007). Reliability of journal impact factor rankings. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 7, 48–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ha, T. C., Tan, S. B., & Soo, K. C. (2006). The journal impact factor: too much of an impact? Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore, 35, 911–916.Google Scholar
  22. Hall, S. A., & Wilcox, A. J. (2007). The fate of epidemiologic manuscripts: a study of papers submitted to Epidemiology. Epidemiology, 18, 262–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hames, I. (2007). Peer review and manuscript management in scientific journals—Guidelines for good practice. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Holaday, M., & Yost, T. E. (1995). Authorship credit and ethical guidelines. Counseling and Values, 40, 24–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keen, A. (2006). Writing for publication: pressures, barriers, and support strategies. Nurse Education Today, 27, 382–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Laflin, M. T., Glover, E. D., & McDermott, R. J. (2005). Publication ethics: an examination of authorship practices. American Journal of Health Behavior, 29, 579–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lambie, G. W., Sias, S. M., Davis, K. M., Lawson, G., & Akos, P. (2008). A scholarly writing resource for counselor educators and their students. Journal of Counseling & Development, 86, 18–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lester, J. D., & Lester, J. D., Jr. (1992). The research paper handbook. Glenview: Goodyear Books.Google Scholar
  29. Liesegang, T. J., Shaikh, M., & Crook, J. E. (2007). The outcome of manuscripts submitted to the American Journal of Ophthalmology between 2002 and 2003. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 143, 551–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McCarthy Veach, P., Bartels, D. M., & LeRoy, B. S. (2001). Ethical and professional challenges posed by patients with genetic concerns: A report of focus group discussions with genetic counselors, physicians, and nurses. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 10, 97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McGaghie, W. C., & Webster, A. (2009). Scholarship, publication, and career advancement in health professions education: AMEE Guide No. 43. Medical Teacher, 31, 574–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Merriam-Webster. (1974). The Merriam-Webster dictionary. New York: Pocket Books.Google Scholar
  33. Nguyen, T., & Nguyen, T. D. (2006). Authorship ethics: issues and suggested guidelines for the helping professions. Counseling and Values, 50, 208–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Roig, M. (2001). Plagiarism and paraphrasing criteria of college and university professors. Ethics & Behavior, 11, 307–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sandler, J. C., & Russell, B. L. (2005). Faculty-student collaborations: ethics and satisfaction with authorship credit. Ethics & Behavior, 15, 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shadish, W. (1994). APA ethics and student authorship on master’s theses. American Psychologist, 49, 1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stith, S. M., Barasch Jester, S., & Linn, J. L. (1992). Student-faculty collaborative research. Family Relations, 41, 470–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. The PLoS Medicine Editors. (2006). The impact factor game. PLoS Medicine, 3, e291 doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291.Google Scholar
  39. Thompson, B. (1994). The big picture(s) in deciding authorship order. American Psychologist, 49, 1095–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Thompson, P. J. (2007). How to choose the right journal for your manuscript. Chest, 132, 1073–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. United States Copyright Office. (2008). Copyright basics. https://doi.org/www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.pdf. Accessed 1/14/2009.
  42. Vogel, K., Murthy, V. S., Dudley, B., Grubs, R. E., Gettig, E., Ford, A., et al. (2007). The use of family health histories to address health disparities in an African-American community. Health Promotion Practice, 8, 350–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wager, E., Parkin, E. C., & Tamber, P. S. (2006). Are reviewers suggested by authors as good as those chosen by editors? Results of a rater-blinded, retrospective study. BMC Medicine, 30, 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Weil, J. (2004). Peer review: an essential step in the publishing process. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 13, 183–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2010

Open AccessThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://doi.org/creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert G. Resta
    • 1
  • Patricia McCarthy Veach
    • 2
  • Sarah Charles
    • 3
  • Kristen Vogel
    • 4
  • Terri Blase
    • 5
  • Christina G. S. Palmer
    • 6
    • 7
    • 8
    Email author
  1. 1.Swedish Cancer InstituteSwedish Medical CenterSeattleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Educational PsychologyUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  3. 3.Jefferson Kimmel Cancer CenterThomas Jefferson University HospitalPhiladelphiaUSA
  4. 4.Center for Medical GeneticsNorthShore University HealthSystemEvanstonUSA
  5. 5.Department of Maternal Fetal MedicineAdvocate Christ Medical CenterOak LawnUSA
  6. 6.Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral SciencesUCLALos AngelesUSA
  7. 7.Department of Human GeneticsUCLALos AngelesUSA
  8. 8.UCLA Semel InstituteLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations