Advertisement

Journal of Genetic Counseling

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 199–210 | Cite as

Long-term Evaluation of Genetic Counseling Following False-Positive Newborn Screen for Cystic Fibrosis

  • Laura Cavanagh
  • Cecilia J. Compton
  • Audrey TluczekEmail author
  • Roger L. Brown
  • Philip M. Farrell
Original Research

Abstract

This cross-sectional mixed method study was a long-term follow-up evaluation of families who participated in an earlier survey of their understanding of cystic fibrosis (CF) genetics and their infants’ false-positive CF newborn screening (NBS) results. Thirty-seven of the original 138 parents participated in the follow-up telephone survey. Results showed parents who received genetic counseling at the time of their infants’ diagnostic sweat tests had significantly higher long-term retention of genetic knowledge than those without genetic counseling. However, both groups still had misconceptions and lacked accurate information about the actual risk associated with being a CF carrier. Most parents either had already informed (65%) or planned to inform (19%) their children about the child’s carrier status. Mean child age at the time of disclosure was 9.2 years. Situational prompts were the most common reasons for informing their children. Neither parental knowledge, medical literacy, nor parental education predicted whether parents informed their children about their carrier status. False-positive NBS results for CF were not associated with parental perceptions of child vulnerability 11–14 years after the testing. Although the sample from this study was small, these findings underscore the benefits of genetic counseling at the time of the diagnostic sweat test and offer information that can assist parents in talking with their children about the implications of having one CFTR mutation.

Keywords

Cystic fibrosis False-positive Genetic counseling Newborn screening Psychosocial 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the families who participated in this study, Michael Farrell, MD for his assistance with the literacy measure and Peggy Modaff, MS, Richard Pauli, MD, Catherine Reiser, MS, and David Wargowski, MD for sharing their wisdom regarding this manuscript. This project was supported by funding from NIH grant #DK34108 and #HG004252 and the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation.

References

  1. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Ethics. (2001). Ethical issues with genetic testing in pediatrics. Pediatrics, 107, 1451–1455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amos, J., Feldman, G. L., Grody, W. W., Monaghan, K., Palomaki, G. E., Prior, T. W., et al. (2006). American College of Medical Genetics. American college of medical genetics: Technical standards and guidelines for CFTR mutation testing: 2006 Edition. Retrieved June 1, 2009, from https://doi.org/www.acmg.net/Pages/ACMG_Activities/stds-2002/cf.htm.
  3. Borry, P., Fryns, J.-P., Schotsmans, P., & Dierickx, K. (2006). Carrier testing in minors: a systematic review of guidelines and position papers. European Journal of Human Genetics, 14, 133–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chew, L. D., Bradley, K. A., & Boyko, E. J. (2004). Brief questions to identify patients with inadequate health literacy. Family Medicine, 36(8), 588–594.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ciske, D. J., Haavisto, A., Laxova, A., Zeng, L., Rock, M., & Farrell, P. M. (2001). Genetic counseling and neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis: an assessment of the communication process. Pediatrics, 107, 699–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cobb, E., Holloway, S., Elton, R., & Raeburn, J. A. (1991). What do young people think about screening for cystic fibrosis? Journal of Medical Genetics, 28(5), 322–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cole, M., & Cole, S. R. (2001). The development of children (4th ed.). New York: Worth Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Collins, M. S., Abbott, M. A., Wakefield, D. B., Lapin, C. D., Drapeau, G., Hopfer, S. M., et al. (2008). Improved pulmonary and growth outcomes in cystic fibrosis by newborn screening. Pediatric Pulmonology, 43, 648–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. (2008). Patient registry annual data report 2007. Retrieved June 1, 2009, from https://doi.org/www.cff.org/UploadedFiles/research/ClinicalResearch/2007-Patient-Registry-Report.pdf.
  10. Farrell, M. H., Certain, L. K., & Farrell, P. M. (2001). Genetic counseling and risk communication services of newborn screening programs. Archives of Pediatric Adolescent Medicine, 155, 120–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Farrell, P. M., Kosorok, M. R., Rock, M. J., Laxova, A., Zeng, L., Lai, H. C., et al. (2001). Early diagnosis of cystic fibrosis through neonatal screening prevents severe malnutrition and improves long-term growth. Pediatrics, 107(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Farrell, P. M., Lai, H. J., Li, Z., Kosorok, M. R., Laxova, A., Green, C. G., et al. (2005). Evidence on improved outcomes with early diagnosis of cystic fibrosis through neonatal screening: Enough is enough! Journal of Pediatrics, 147, S30–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Farrell, P. M., Rosenstein, B. J., White, T. B., Accurso, F. J., Castellani, C., Cutting, G. R., et al. (2008). Guidelines for diagnosis of cystic fibrosis in newborns through older adults: Cystic Fibrosis Foundation consensus report. Journal of Pediatrics, 153(2), S4–S14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fiedman, M. M., Bowden, V. R., & Jones, E. G. (2003). Family nursing: Research, theory, and practice (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  15. Forsyth, B. W. C., & Canny, P. F. (1991). Perceptions of vulnerability 3 ½ years after problems of feeding and crying behavior in early infancy. Pediatrics, 88(4), 757–763.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Forsyth, B. W. C., Horwitz, S. M., Leventhal, J. M., Burger, J. (1996). The child vulnerability scale: An instrument to measure parental perceptions of child vulnerability. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 21(1), 89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gallo, A. M., Angst, D., Knafl, K. A., Hadley, E., & Smith, C. (2005). Parents sharing information with their children about genetic conditions. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 19(5), 267–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Green, M., & Solnit, A. J. (1964). Reactions to the threatened loss of a child: a vulnerable child syndrome: pediatric management of the dying child, part III. Pediatrics, 34, 58–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Gurian, E. A., Kinnamon, D. D., Henry, J. J., & Waisbren, S. E. (2006). Expanded newborn screening for biomedical disorders: the effects of false-positive result. Pediatrics, 117(6), 1915–1921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kerruish, N. J., Campbell-Stokes, P. L., Gray, A., Merriman, T. R., Robertson S. P., et al. (2007). Maternal psychological reaction to newborn genetic screening for type 1 diabetes. Pediatrics, 120(2), e324–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kloosterboer, M., Hoffman, G., Rock, M. J., Gershan, W., Laxova, A., Li, Z., et al. (2009). Clarification of laboratory variables influencing CF newborn screening with initial analysis of immunoreactive trypsinogen. Pediatrics, 123, 338–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  23. Lewis, S., Curnow, L., Ross, M., & Massie, J. (2006). Parental attitudes to the identification of their infants as carriers of cystic fibrosis by NBS. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 42, 533–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Metcalfe, A., Coad, J., Plumridge, G. M., Gill, P., & Farndon, P. (2008). Family communication between children and their parents about inherited genetic conditions: a meta-synthesis of the research. European Journal of Human Genetics, 16(10), 1193–1200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Morris, N. S., MacLean, C. D., Chew, L. D., & Littenberg, B. (2006). The single item literacy screener: evaluation of a brief instrument to identify limited reading ability. BMC Family Practice, 24, 7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moskowitz, S. M., Chmiel, J. F., Sternen, D. L., Cheng, E., Gibson, R. L., Marshall, S. G., et al. (2008). Clinical practice and genetic counseling for cystic fibrosis and CFTR-related disorders. Genetics in Medicine, 10(12), 851–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. National Newborn Screening and Genetics Resource Center. (2009). National newborn screening status report. Retrieved June 1, 2009, from https://doi.org/genes-r-us.uthscsa.edu/nbsdisorders.pdf.
  28. Parsons, E. P., Clarke, A. J., & Bradley, D. M. (2003). Implications of carrier identification in newborn screening for cystic fibrosis. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 88, 467–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Poulakis, Z., Barker, M., & Wake, M. (2003). Six month impact of false positives in an Australian infant hearing screening programme. Archives of Diseases in Children, 88, 20–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rock, M. J., Hoffman, G., Laessig, R. H., Kopish, G. J., Litsheim, T. J., & Farrell, P. M. (2005). Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis in Wisconsin: Nine-year experience with routine trypsinogen/DNA testing. Journal of Pediatrics, 147, S73–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tluczek, A., Mischler, E. H., Farrell, P. M., Fost, N., Peterson, N. M., Carey, P., et al. (1992). Parents’ knowledge of neonatal screening and response to false-positive cystic fibrosis testing. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 13(3), 181–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Waisbren, S. E., Albers, S., Amato, S., Ampola, M., Brewster, T. G., Demmer, L., et al. (2003). Effects of expanded newborn screening for biomedical genetic disorders on child outcomes and parental stress. JAMA, 290(19), 2564–2572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wheeler, P. G., Smith, R., Dorkin, H., Parad, R. B., Comeau, A. M., & Bianchi, D. W. (2001). Genetic counseling after implementation of statewide cystic fibrosis newborn screening: two years’ experience in one medical center. Genetics in Medicine, 3(6), 411–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© National Society of Genetic Counselors, Inc. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laura Cavanagh
    • 1
  • Cecilia J. Compton
    • 2
  • Audrey Tluczek
    • 3
    • 4
    Email author
  • Roger L. Brown
    • 3
    • 4
  • Philip M. Farrell
    • 4
  1. 1.Genetics CenterOrangeUSA
  2. 2.LondonUK
  3. 3.University of Wisconsin School of NursingMadisonUSA
  4. 4.University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public HealthMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations