Assessment of the Content and Process of Genetic Counseling: A Critical Review of Empirical Studies
- 1.2k Downloads
This article reviews studies that assessed the process and content of genetic counseling communication. A systematic search of the literature was undertaken of studies that audio- or videotaped genetic counseling sessions conducted by genetics health care providers and subjected them to communication analyses. A total of 18 studies (published in 34 articles) were identified that met the eligibility criteria. Studies show that providers speak more than clients, that a large proportion of communication is biomedical rather than psychosocial and that the teaching model of genetic counseling is widely implemented. Higher levels of counselor facilitation of understanding and empathic responses, lower levels of verbal dominance (ratio of counselor to client talk) and the provision of a summary letter of the consultation are associated with more positive client outcomes. Findings from these studies should be used as an evidence base for teaching and continuing education of genetic counseling providers.
KeywordsGenetic counseling Process studies Interaction analysis Audiorecording Videorecording Communication analysis
We would like to thank the reviewers for their valuable suggestions. Bettina Meiser is supported by a Career Development Award from The National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (ID 350989).
- American Board of Genetic Counseling. (2008). www.abgc.net. Accessed on February 27, 2008.
- Bernhardt, B. A., Geller, G. A., Doksum, T., Larson, S. M., Roter, D. A., & Holtzman, N. A. (1998). Prenatal genetic testing: Content of discussions between obstetric providers and pregnant women. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 91, 648–655. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(98)00011-8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chapple, A., & May, C. (1996). Genetic knowledge and family relationships: Two case studies. Health & Social Care in the Community, 4, 166–171.Google Scholar
- Hallowell, N., Green, J. M., Statham, H., Murton, F., & Richards, M. P. H. (1997a). Recall of numerical risk estimates and counselees’ perceptions of the importance of risk information following genetic counselling for breast and ovarian cancer. Psychology & Health, 2, 149–159.Google Scholar
- Hamby Erby, L. (2005). Understanding the genetic counselling process: The use of simulated clients in examining the genetic counseling interaction. Baltimore: The John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.Google Scholar
- Hamby, L. (2001). Discussions of personal meaning in pre-amniocentesis genetic counseling. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
- Hsia, Y. E. (1979). The genetic counselor as information giver. In A. M. Capron, M. R. F. Lappé, T. M. Powledge, S. B. Twiss, & D. Bergsma (Eds.), Genetic counseling: Facts, values and norms, Vol. XV, No. 2 (pp. 169–186). New York: Alan R. Liss Vol. Birth Defects: Original Article Series.Google Scholar
- Human Genetics Society of Australasia. (2008). http://www.hgsa.com.au. Accessed on February 27, 2008).
- Hunfeld, J. A. M., Leurs, A., de Jong, M., Oberstein, M. L., Tibben, A., Wladimiroff, J. W., et al. (1999). Prenatal consultation after a fetal anomaly scan: Videotaped exploration of physician's attitude and patients’ satisfaction. Prenatal Diagnosis, 19, 1043–1047. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199911)19:11<1043::AID-PD697>3.0.CO;2-T.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kelly, P. (1977). Dealing with dilemma. Springer: New York.Google Scholar
- Kemel, Y. (2000). What happens during the prenatal genetic counseling session: exploratory study of genetic counseling. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
- Kessler, S. (1979a). The genetic counseling session. In S. Kessler (Ed.), Genetic counseling: Psychological dimensions (pp. 1–3). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
- Kessler, S. (1979b). The genetic counselor as psychotherapist. In A. M. Capron, M. Lappé, R. F. Murray, T. M. Powledge, S. B. Twiss, & D. Bergsma (Eds.), Genetic counseling: Facts, values and norms, Vol. Vol. XV, No. 2 (pp. 187–200). New York: Alan R. Liss Birth Defects: Original Article Series.Google Scholar
- Kessler, S. (1992). Process issues in genetic counseling. In G. Evers-Kiebooms, J. P. Fryns, & J. J. Cassiman (Eds.), Psychosocial aspects of genetic counseling (pp. 1–10). New York: Wiley–Liss.Google Scholar
- Kessler, S., & Jacopini, A. G. (1982a). Psychological aspects of genetic counseling. I. Qualitative analysis of a transcript of a genetic counseling session. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 39, 253–264.Google Scholar
- Ley, P. (1988). Communicating with patients: Improving communication satisfaction and compliance. Croom Helm: London.Google Scholar
- Lippman-Hand, A., & Fraser, F. C. (1979a). Genetic counseling: Parents’ responses to uncertainty. In C. Epstein, C. J. R. Curry, S. Packman, & S. Sherman (Eds.), Risk, communication, and decision making in genetic counseling, Vol. Vol. XV, No. 5C (pp. 325–339). New York: Alan R. Liss Birth defects: Original Article Series.Google Scholar
- Lippman-Hand, A., & Fraser, F. C. (1979b). Genetic counseling: Provision and reception of information. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 9, 117–136.Google Scholar
- Lobb, E., Butow, P., Meiser, B., Barratt, A., Gaff, C., Young, M., et al. (2003). Women's preferences and consultants’ communication of risk in consultations about familial breast cancer: Impact on patient outcomes. Journal of Medical Genetics, 40, e56. doi: 10.1136/jmg.40.5.e56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lobb, E. A., Butow, P. N., Meiser, B., Barratt, A., Gaff, C., Young, M. A., et al. (2002b). The influence of consultants' communication and information-giving behaviours on patient outcomes: A multi centre study of genetic counselling with women from high risk breast cancer families. European Journal of Human Genetics, 10, 312–313.Google Scholar
- Michie, S., & Marteau, T. (1996). Genetic counselling: Some issues of theory and practice. In T. Marteau, & M. Richards (Eds.), The troubled helix: Social and psychological implications of the new human genetics (pp. 104–122). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Pieterse, A., van Dulmen, S., Ausems, M., & Bensing, J. (2006). Tailoring communication in cancer genetic counseling through individual video-supported feedback: A controlled pretest–post-test design. Patient Education and Counseling, 60, 326–335. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.06.009.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pieterse, A., van Dulmen, S., Beemer, F., Bensing, J., & Ausems, M. (2007). Cancer genetic counseling: Communucations and counselees' post-visit satisfaction, cognitions, anxiety and needs fulfillment. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16, 85–96. doi: 10.1007/s10897-006-9048-1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rapp, R. (1999). Testing women: Testing the Fetus: The social impact of amniocentesis in America. Routledge: New York.Google Scholar
- Roter, D., & Hall, J. (1997). Patient–provider communication. In K. Glanz, F. Lewis, & B. Rimer (Eds.), Health behavior and health education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Teyber, E. (2000). Therapist variables. In C. Snyder, & R. Ingram (Eds.), Handbook of psychological change: Psychotherapy processes and practices for the 21st century. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar