Journal of Genetic Counseling

, Volume 17, Issue 5, pp 424–433

Standardized Human Pedigree Nomenclature: Update and Assessment of the Recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors

  • Robin L. Bennett
  • Kathryn Steinhaus French
  • Robert G. Resta
  • Debra Lochner Doyle
Professional Issues

Abstract

In 1995, the Pedigree Standardization Task Force (PSTF) of the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC) proposed a system of pedigree nomenclature. Recently, the PSTF (now called the Pedigree Standardization Work Group or PSWG) sought evidence that the published symbols met the needs of health professionals, were incorporated into health professional training and were utilized in publications. We searched PubMed and reference lists of select publications, reviewed the Instructions for Authors of several journals, searched the websites of professional societies, sought comment from the membership of the NSGC, and looked at recommendations and training practices of various health professional organizations. Many journals still do not cite specific standards for pedigrees, but those found cited the PSTF nomenclature. We did not find significant objections or alternatives to the 1995 nomenclature. Based on our review, we propose only a few minor stylistic changes to the pedigree symbols. The pedigree nomenclature of the NSGC is the only consistently acknowledged standard for drawing a family health history. We recommend regular and continued review of these pedigree standards to determine if additional symbols are needed to accommodate changes in clinical practice to ensure that the symbols continue to meet the needs of health professionals and researchers as well as adhere to evolving ethical and privacy standards. All health professionals, trainees, and researchers should be made aware of the utility of using a common pedigree nomenclature in clinical practice and publication. This will become particularly important as electronic medical records become more widely utilized.

Keywords

Electronic medical record Family history Genetic counseling National Society of Genetic Counselors Pedigree symbols Pedigree standardization 

References

  1. Adult Society.com. Retrieved 10-16-2007, from http://www.adult-society.com/transgender.html.
  2. American Medical Association (2007). AMA manual of style: a guide for authors and editors (pp. 660–666, 10th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. American Society of Clinical Oncologists (2004). ASCO curriculum: Cancer genetics and cancer predisposition (pp. 3–7, 2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCO.Google Scholar
  4. Bennett, R. L. (1999). The practical guide to the genetic family history. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Bennett, R. L. (2000). Pedigree parables. Clinical Genetics, 58, 241–249 doi:10.1034/j.1399-0004.2000.580401.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bennett, R. L. (2006a). Genetic counseling. In M. S. Runge, & W. C. Patterson (Eds.), Principles of molecular medicine (pp. 46–52, 2nd ed.). Totowa, New Jersey: Humana Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bennett, R. L. (2006b). Genetic counseling. In D. R. Lynch (Ed.). Neurogenetics: scientific and clinical advances (pp. 32–34). New York: Taylor Francis.Google Scholar
  8. Bennett, R., Lochner Doyle, D., Harrison, T., Byers, P. (2007). Core elements of the pedigree in the era of electronic medical records. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16, 687 Cooper, S. and Austin, J., Presented Abstracts from the twenty-sixth annual education conference of the National Society of Genetic Counselors, Kansas City, Missouri, October 2007. doi:10.1007/s10897-007-9100-9
  9. Bennett, R. L., Steinhaus, K. A., Uhrich, S. B., & O’Sullivan, C. (1993). The need for developing standardized family pedigree nomenclature. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 2, 261–273. doi:10.1007/BF00961575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bennett, R. L., Steinhaus, K. A., Uhrich, S. B., O’Sullivan, C., Resta, R. G., Doyle, D. L., et al. (1995). Recommendations for standardized pedigree nomenclature. American Journal of Human Genetics, 56, 745–752.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Botkin, J. R., McMahon, W. M., Smith, K. R., & Nash, J. E. (1998). Privacy and confidentiality in the publication of pedigrees: a survey of investigators and biomedical journals. Journal of the American Medical Association, 279, 1808–1812 doi:10.1001/jama.279.22.1808.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Byers, P. H., & Ashkenas, J. (1998). Pedigree—publish? Or perish the thought? American Journal of Human Genetics, 63, 678–681 doi:10.1086/302033.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Firth, H. V., Hurst, J. A., & Hall, J. G. (2005). Oxford desk reference: clinical genetics (p. 674). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Galton, F. (1889). Natural inheritance (p. 249). London: Macmillian.Google Scholar
  15. Genetic Nursing Credentialing Commission. Retrieved 10-16-2007, from http://www.geneticnurse.org [home].
  16. Jenkins, J., & Calzone, K. A. (2007). Establishing the essential nursing competencies for genetics and genomics. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 39, 10–16 doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00137.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kingston, H. M. (2007). Genetic Assessment and pedigree analysis. In D. L. Rimoin, J. M. Connor, R. E. Pyeritz, & B. R. Korf (Eds.), Emery and Rimoin’s principles and practice of medical genetics (pp. 520–522, 5th ed.). Philadelphia: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  18. LeRoy, B. S., & Walker, A. P. (2002). Genetic counseling: history, risk assessment, strategies and ethical considerations. In R. A. King, J. Rotter, & A. H. Motulsky (Eds.), The genetic bases of common disease (pp. 87–101, 2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. National Coalition of Health Professionals Education in Genetics (NCHPEG) (1995). Core competencies in genetics for all health professionals. Retrieved 10-16-2007, from http://www.nchpeg.org/core/corecomps2005.pdf.
  20. Nukaga, Y., & Cambrosio, A. (1997). Medical pedigrees and the visual production of family disease in Canadian and Japanese genetic counselling practice. In M. Elston (Ed.). The sociology of medical science & technology (pp. 29–55). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  21. Nussbaum, R. L., McInnes, R. R., & Willard, H. F. (2007). Thompson and Thompson, genetics in medicine (pp. 117–118, 7th ed.). Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier.Google Scholar
  22. Offitt, K., Groeger, E., Turner, S., Wadsworth, B. A., & Weiser, M. A. (2004). The “duty to warn” a patient’s family members about hereditary disease risk. Journal of the American Medical Association, 292, 1469–1473 doi:10.1001/jama.292.12.1469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Preview, S.C.O.P.U.S. Retrieved 10-16-2007, from http://www.scopus.com.
  24. Resta, R. G. (1993). The crane’s foot—the rise of the pedigree in human genetics. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 2, 235–260. doi:10.1007/BF00961574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schuette, J. L., & Bennett, R. L. (1998). Lessons in history: obtaining the family history and constructing a pedigree. In D. L. Baker, J. L. Schuette, & W. R. Uhlmann (Eds.), Lessons in history: obtaining the family history and constructing a pedigree A guide to genetic counseling (pp. 27–54). New York: Wiley–Liss.Google Scholar
  26. Steinhaus, K. A., Bennett, R. L., Uhrich, S. B., Resta, R. G., Doyle, D. L., Markel, D., et al. (1995). Inconsistencies in pedigree nomenclature in human genetics publications: a need for standardization. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 56, 291–295 doi:10.1002/ajmg.1320560314.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Turnpenny, P., & Ellard, S. (2007). Emery’s elements of medical genetics (p. 104, 13th ed.). Churchill Livingston: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  28. Vilain, E., Achermann, J. C., Eugster, E. A., Harley, V. R., Morel, Y., Wilson, J. D., et al. (2007). We used to call them hermaphrodites. Genetics in Medicine, 9, 67–73 doi:10.1097/GIM.0b013e31802cffcf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© National Society of Genetic Counselors, Inc. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robin L. Bennett
    • 1
  • Kathryn Steinhaus French
    • 2
  • Robert G. Resta
    • 3
  • Debra Lochner Doyle
    • 4
  1. 1.Division of Medical Genetics, Department of MedicineUniversity of Washington Medical CenterSeattleUSA
  2. 2.Division of Genetics and MetabolismUniversity of California, IrvineOrangeUSA
  3. 3.Hereditary Cancer ClinicSwedish Cancer InstituteSeattleUSA
  4. 4.Genetic Services SectionWashington State Department of HealthSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations