The Importance of Program Evaluation: How Can it be Applied to Diverse Genetics Education Settings?
- First Online:
- 324 Downloads
The role of a genetic counselor often entails providing education to patient, community and/or health professional groups. While counseling supervision assists genetic counselors to be reflective about their clinical work and to enhance clinical skills, evaluation is a rather analogous process in the provision of education. Program evaluation of education activities can be applied to provide information about the needs of the target group (needs assessment), the delivery of the program (process evaluation) as well as determining the extent to which the education activity has met its intended aims (summative evaluation). Evaluation assists the educator to assess the impact of their program and provides an evidence base about genetics education. Although program evaluation can be a complex activity, the tools are ones that can be used by individuals to evaluate single or simple education activities. The components of evaluation are discussed with reference to genetic counseling practice and three very different examples of actual evaluations are provided to illustrate the diversity of evaluation strategy and programs to which it can be applied.
KeywordsGenetics education Program evaluation Program logic Needs assessment Genetic counselors Health professional genetics education Community genetics education
- Burke, S., Bedward, J., Thomas, H., & Farndon, P. (2005). Genetic education for non-genetic SpRs: a needs analysis. The University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
- Burton, H. (2003). Addressing genetics, delivering health. A strategy for advancing the dissemination and application of genetics knowledge throughout our health professions. London, UK: The Wellcome Trust and Department of Health.Google Scholar
- Funnell, S. (1997). Program logic: An adaptable tool for designing and evaluating programs. Evaluation News & Comment, 6, 5–17.Google Scholar
- Hawe, P., Degeling, D., & Hall, J. (1990). Evaluating health promotion: A health worker’s guide. Sydney: MacLennan & Petty.Google Scholar
- Hawthorne, G. (2000). Introduction to health program evaluation. Melbourne: Centre for Health Program Evaluation.Google Scholar
- Kirk, M., McDonald, K., Anstey, S., & Longley, M. (2003). Fit for practice in the genetics era. Final Report to Department of Health. Pontypridd, University of Glamorgan.Google Scholar
- Knowles, M. S. (Ed.) (1996). Andragogy: An emerging technology for adult learning. Boundaries of adult learning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Koelen, M. A., & van den Ban, A. W. (2004). Health education and health promotion. The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- National Coalition of Health Professional Education in Genetics: http://www.nchpeg.org/. Accessed 10 July 2007.
- Ovretveit, J. (1998). Planning and managing an evaluation. In J. Ovretveit (Ed.), Evaluating health interventions: An introduction to evaluation of health treatments, services, policies and organizational interventions (pp. 158–180). Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Owen, J., & Rogers, P. (1999). Program evaluation: forms and approaches. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
- Patton, M. (1986). Utilization-focused evaluation. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
- Robson, C. (2002). Real world research. A resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Rossi, P., Freeman, H., & Lipsey, M. (1993). Evaluation: A systematic approach. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
- Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation thesaurus. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
- Siebert, D. (2008). Secrets to creating effective and interesting education experiences: Tips and suggestions for clinical educators. Journal of Genetic Counselling, 17(2).Google Scholar
- Wholey, J. S., Hatry, H. P., & Newcomer, K. E. (2004). Handbook of practical program evaluation. San Francisco: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Wilson, J. M., & Jungner, G. (1968). Principles and practice of screening for disease. Geneva: World Health Organisation.Google Scholar