Advertisement

Journal of Genetic Counseling

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 457–468 | Cite as

Health Beliefs and Behaviors of Women Who Have Received Genetic Counseling For Breast Cancer

  • Gwyneth ReesEmail author
  • Clara Gaff
  • Mary-Anne Young
  • Paul R. Martin
Original Article

There are both genetic and behavioral risk factors for breast cancer, but the interaction between these factors is not clear. Little is known about the impact of receiving genetic risk information for breast cancer on behaviors such as diet and physical activity. Seven focus groups were conducted with 23 women who had recently received genetic counseling for breast cancer, in order to explore health beliefs and behaviors following genetic counseling. Findings revealed that there was much confusion and uncertainty about the associations between health behaviors and breast cancer risk, and participants reported that receiving genetic counseling had little impact on health protective behaviors. Further research is required to understand variation in response to genetic risk information, and to assess the impact of providing additional information regarding lifestyle factors.

KEY WORDS:

breast cancer genetic counseling health behaviors health beliefs qualitative lifestyle risk 

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Thanks to Donna Milne and Cathie Pigott for helping in running the groups, and to Lena Hartley, Rebecca D’Souza and Leone Fabre for organising recruitment. Many thanks also to all the participants who shared their views with us.

REFERENCES

  1. Affleck, G., Tennen, H., Pfeiffer, C., & Fifield, C. (1987). Appraisals of control and predictability in adapting to a chronic disease. J Pers Soc Psychol, 53, 273–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Appleton, S., Fry, A., Rees, G., Rush, R., & Cull, A. (2000). Psychosocial effects of living with an increased risk of breast cancer: An exploratory study using telephone focus groups. Psycho-Oncology, 9(6), 511–521.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Audrain, J., Schwartz, M., Herrera, J., Goldman, P., & Bush, A. (2001). Physical activity in first-degree relatives of breast cancer patients. J Behavior Med, 24(6), 587–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Audrain, J., Schwartz, M., Lerman, C., Hughes, C., Peshkin, B. N., & Biesecker, B. (1997). Psychological distress in women seeking genetic counseling for breast-ovarian cancer risk: The contributions of personality and appraisal. Annals Behavior Med, 19(4), 370–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biesecker, B. B., & Marteau, T. M. (1999). The future of genetic counselling: an international perspective. Nature Genetics, 22, 133–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Botkin, J. R., Smith, K. R., Croyle, R. T., Baty, B. J., Wylie, J. E., Dutson, D. et al. (2003). Genetic testing for a BRCA1 mutation: Prophylactic surgery and screening behavior in women 2 years post testing. A J Med Gene Part A, 118A(3), 201–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Braithwaite, D., Emery, J., Walter, F., Prevost, A. T., & Sutton, S. (2004). Psychological impact of genetic counseling for familial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Nati Cancer Inst, 96(2), 122–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burger, J. M., & Cooper, H. M. (1979). The desirability of control. Motiv Emotion, 3, 381–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Butow, P. N., Hiller, J. E., Price, M. A., Thackway, S. V., Kricker, A., & Tennant, C. C. (2000). Epidemiological evidence for a relationship between life events, coping style, and personality factors in the development of breast cancer. J Psychosomatic Res, 49(3), 169–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carpenter, C. L., Ross, R. K., Paganini-Hill, A., & Bernstein, L. (2003). Effect of family history, obesity and exercise on breast cancer risk among postmenopausal women. Int J Cancer, 106, 96–102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duvall, K. (2006). A portrait of a high risk clinic team: the nutritionalist's role. Psycho-Oncology, 15(2), S84.Google Scholar
  12. Elder, J. P., Ayala, G. X., & Harris, S. (1999). Theories and intervention approaches to health-behavior change in primary care. A J Prev Med, 17(4), 275–284.Google Scholar
  13. Ford, C., Easton, D. F., & Peto, J. (1995). Estimates of the gene frequency of BRCA1 and its contribution to breast and ovarian cancer incidence. A J Hum Gen, 57, 1457–1462.Google Scholar
  14. Friedenreich, C. M., & Orenstein, M. R. (2002). Physical activity and cancer prevention: Etiologic evidence and biological mechanisms. J Nutr, 132(11S), S3456–S3464.Google Scholar
  15. Gibbs, G. (2002). Qualitative data analysis: Explorations with NVIVO. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gramling, R., Nash, J., Siren, K., & Culpepper, L. (2003). Predictive genetics in primary care: Expectations for the motivational impact of genetic testing affects the importance family physicians place on screening for familial cancer risk. Gen Med, 5(3), 172–175.Google Scholar
  17. Grunfeld, E. A., Ramirez, A., Hunter, M. S., & Richards, M. A. (2002). Women's knowledge and beliefs regarding breast cancer. Br J Cancer, 86(9), 1373–1378.PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hadley, D. W., Jenkins, J. F., Dimond, E., de Carvalho, M., Kirsch, I., & Palmer, C. G. S. (2004). Colon cancer screening practices after genetic counseling and testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncology, 22(1), 39–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hall, S., Weinman, J., & Marteau, T. (2004). The motivating impact of informing women smokers of a link between smoking and cervical cancer: The role of coherence. Health Psychology, 23(4), 419–424.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jepson, R. (2000). The Effectiveness of Interventions to Change Health-Related Behaviours: A Review of Reviews. (No. Occasional Paper No. 3). Glasgow: Medical Research Council, MRC Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, Uniersity of Glasgow.Google Scholar
  21. Johnson, K. A., Trimbath, J. D., Petersen, G. M., Griffin, C. A., & Giardiello, F. M. (2002). Impact of genetic counseling and testing on colorectal cancer screening behavior. Gen Testing, 6(4), 303–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johnson, K. C., Dixon, J. M., & Steel, C. M. (2001). Risk factors for breast cancer. Br Med J, 322(7282), 365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kenen, R., Ardern-Jones, A., & Eeles, R. (2003). Living with chronic risk: healthy women with a family history of breast/ovarian cancer. Health Risk Soc, 5(3), 315–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kim, Y., Valdimarsdottir, H. B., & Bovbjerg, D. H. (2003). Family histories of breast cancer, coping styles, and psychological adjustment. J Behavioral Med, 26(3), 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. King, M., Marks, J. H., & Mandell, J. B. (2003). Breast and ovarian cancer risk due to inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Science, 302, 643–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Krueger, R. A., King, J. A., & Morgan, D. L. (1998). Focus group kit. California: SAGE.Google Scholar
  27. Lemon, S. C., Zapka, J. G., & Clemow, L. (2004). Health behavior change among women with recent familial diagnosis of breast cancer. Preventive Medicine, 39, 253–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Leventhal, H., Benyamini, Y., Brownlee, S., Diefenbach, M., Leventhal, E. A., Patrick-Millar, L. et al. (1997). Illness representations: Theoretical foundations. In K. J. Petrie & J. Weinman (Eds.), Perceptions of health and illness. Current research and applications. Amsterdam: Harwood.Google Scholar
  29. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marteau, T. M., & Lerman, C. Y. (2001). Genetic risk and behavioural change. B Med J, 322(7293), 1056–1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marteau, T. M., & Weinman, J. (2006). Self-regulation and the behavioural response to DNA risk information: A theoretical analysis and framework for future research. Soc Sci Med, 62(6), 1360–1368.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Maykut, P., & Morehouse, R. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: Using the constant comparative method. In Beginning Qualitative Research: A Philosophic and Practical Guide. (pp. 126–149). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  33. McPherson, K., Steel, C. M., & Dixon, J. M. (2000). ABC of breast diseases: Breast cancer epidemiology, risk factors, and genetics. Br Med J, 321(7261), 624–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McTiernan, A. (2003). Behavioral risk factors in breast cancer: Can risk be modified? Oncologist, 8(4), 326–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. NHMRC. (1999). Familial aspects of cancer: A guide to clinical practice. Canberra, Australia: National Health and Medical Research Council.Google Scholar
  36. Pichert, G., Bolliger, B., Buser, K., & Pagani, O. (2003). Evidence-based management options for women at increased breast/ovarian cancer risk. Annals Oncology, 14, 9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rees, G., Fry, A., & Cull, A. (2001). A family history of breast cancer: women's experiences from a theoretical perspective. Social Science & Medicine, 52, 1433–1440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rees, G., Young, M. A., Gaff, C., & Martin, P. R. (2006). A qualitative study of health professionals’ views regarding provision of information about health-protective behaviors during genetic consultation for breast cancer. J Gen Coun, 15(2), 95–104.Google Scholar
  39. Richard, R., vanderPligt, J., & deVries, N. (1996). Anticipated affect and behavioral choice. Basic Appl Soc Psychol, 18(2), 111–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Robertson, A. (2000). Embodying risk, embodying political rationality: women's accounts of risk for breast cancer. Health Risk Soc, 2(2), 219–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychol Monographs, 80(1), 609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schwartz, M. D., Kaufman, E., Peshkin, B. N., Isaacs, C., Hughes, C., DeMarco, T. et al. (2003). Bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy and ovarian cancer screening following BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation testing. J Clin Oncology, 21(21), 4034–4041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sheeran, P., Milne, S., Webb, T., & Gollwitzer, P. (Eds.). (2005). Implementing Intentions and Health Behaviour. (2 ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Steptoe, A., Kerry, S., Rink, E., & Hilton, S. (2001). The impact of behavioral counseling on stage of change in fat intake, physical activity, and cigarette smoking in adults at increased risk of coronary heart disease. A J Public Health, 91, 265– 269.Google Scholar
  45. Stewart, D. E., Cheung, A. M., Duff, S., Wong, F., McQuestion, M., Cheng, T. et al. (2001). Attributions of cause and recurrence in long-term breast cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology, 10(2), 179–183.Google Scholar
  46. Thompson, S. C., & Collins, M. A. (1995). Applications of perceived control to cancer—An overview of theory and measurement. J Psychosoc Oncology, 13(1–2), 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Thomson, C. A., Flatt, S. W., Rock, C. L., Ritenbaugh, C., Newman, V., & Pierce, J. P. (2002). Increased fruit, vegetable and fiber intake and lower fat intake reported among women previously treated for invasive breast cancer. J A Diet Assoc, 102(6), 801–808.Google Scholar
  48. Vachon, C. M., Cerhan, J. R., Vierkant, R. A., & Sellers, T. A. (2001). Investigation of an interaction of alcohol intake and family history of breast cancer risk in the Minnesota Breast Cancer Family Study. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers Prev, 92(2), 240–248.Google Scholar
  49. Vaughn, S., Schumm, J. S., & Sinagub, J. (1996). Focus Group Interviews in Education and Psychology. California: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wilkinson, S. (2004). Focus group research. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative Research: Theory, Method, Practice (pp. 177–199). London: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gwyneth Rees
    • 1
    • 7
    Email author
  • Clara Gaff
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Mary-Anne Young
    • 5
  • Paul R. Martin
    • 6
  1. 1.Centre for Eye Research AustraliaUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Familial Cancer CentreRoyal Melbourne HospitalMelbourneAustralia
  3. 3.Genetic Health Services VictoriaMelbourneAustralia
  4. 4.Institute of Medical GeneticsCardiff UniversityCardiffUK
  5. 5.Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer InstituteMelbourneAustralia
  6. 6.Monash University, Monash Medical CentreClaytonAustralia
  7. 7.Centre for Eye Research AustraliaUniversity of MelbourneEast MelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations