Advertisement

Journal of Genetic Counseling

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 99–107 | Cite as

Psychodynamic Theory and Counseling in Predictive Testing for Huntington’s Disease

  • Roslyn J. Tassicker
Professional Issues

Abstract

This paper revisits psychodynamic theory, which can be applied in predictive testing counseling for Huntington’s Disease (HD). Psychodynamic theory has developed from the work of Freud and places importance on early parent–child experiences. The nature of these relationships, or attachments are reflected in adult expectations and relationships. Two significant concepts, identification and fear of abandonment, have been developed and expounded by the psychodynamic theorist, Melanie Klein. The processes of identification and fear of abandonment can become evident in predictive testing counseling and are colored by the client’s experience of growing up with a parent affected by Huntington’s Disease. In reflecting on family-of-origin experiences, clients can also express implied expectations of the future, and future relationships. Case examples are given to illustrate the dynamic processes of identification and fear of abandonment which may present in the clinical setting. Counselor recognition of these processes can illuminate and inform counseling practice.

Key words

counseling Huntington’s Disease psychodynamic theory 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Almqvist, E. W., Bloch, M., Brinkman, R., Craufurd, & D., Hayden, MR. (1999). A worldwide assessment of the frequency of suicide, suicide attempts, or psychiatric hospitalisation after predictive testing for huntington’s disease. Am J Hum Gen, 64, 1293–1304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldwin, J. (1954). Go tell it on the mountain. London: Corgi.Google Scholar
  3. Bowlby, J. (1979). The making and breaking of affectional bonds. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
  4. Codori, A., & Brandt, J. (1994). Psychological costs and benefits of predictive testing for Huntington’s Disease. Am J Med Genet (Neuropsychiatric Genetics), 54, 174–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Daniell, D. (1985). Marital therapy: The psychodynamic approach. In Dryden W Marital Therapy in Britain. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Diekmann-Tapon, D. (1999). Case report: Object relations family therapy as a model for genetic counseling J Genet Couns, 4, 235–245.Google Scholar
  7. Decruyenaere, M., Evers-Kiebooms, G., Cloostermans, T., Boogaerts, A., Demyttenaere, K., Dom, R., & Fryns. J. P. (2003). Psychological distress in the 5-year period after predictive testing for Huntington’s disease. Eu J Hum Gen, 11, 30–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dudokde-Wit, A. C., Tibben, A., Duivenvoorden, H. J., Niermeijer, M. F., Passchier, J., & Trijsburg, R. W. (1998). Distress in individuals facing predictive DNA testing for autosomal dominant Late-onset disorders. Am J Med Genet, 75, 62–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Duisterhof, M., Trijsburg, R. W., Niermeijer, M. F., Roos, R. A. C., & Tibben, A. (2001). Psychological studies in Huntington’s disease: Making up the balance. J Med Genet, 38, 852–861.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hall, C. S., & Lindzey, G. (1970). Theories of personality. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. International Huntington Association and World Federation of Neurology Research Group on Huntington’s Chorea. (1994). Guidelines for the molecular genetics predictive test in Huntington’s Disease. Neurology, 44, 1533–1536.Google Scholar
  12. Kessler, S. (1984). Psychological aspects of genetic counseling. 111. Management of guilt and shame. Am J Med Genet, 17, 673–697.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kessler, S., & Bloch, M. (1989). Social system responses to Huntington’s Disease. Family Processes, 28, 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kessler, S. (1992). Psychological aspects of genetic counseling. V111. Suffering and countertransference. J Genet Couns, 1, 303–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kessler, S. (1994). Predictive testing for Huntington’s Disease: A Psychologist’s View. Am J Med Genet, 54, 161–166.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kessler, S. (1997). Psychological aspects of genetic counseling. Teaching and counseling. J Genet Couns, 6, 287–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lerner, H. (1989). The dance of anger. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  18. Myers, R., Murans, K., & MacDonald, M. (1998). Huntington’s disease. In R. Wells, & S. Warren, (Eds.), Genetic instabilities and hereditary neurological diseases, (pp. 301–323). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  19. Otlowski, M. F., Taylor, S. D., & Barlow-Stewart, K. (2002). Major study commencing into genetic discrimination in Australia. J Law and Med, 10, 41–48.Google Scholar
  20. Quaid, K. A. (1992). Presymptomatic testing for Huntington’s Disease: Recommendations for counseling. J Genet Counsel, 1, 277–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Richards, F., & Taylor, S. (1997). Social work and genetic testing: Ethical issues encountered in predictive testing for Huntington’s Disease. Austral Social Work, 50, 61–67.Google Scholar
  22. Soldan, J., Street, E., Gray, J., Binedell, J., & Harper, P. S. (2000). Pyschological model for presymptomatic test interviews: Lessons learned from Huntington’s Disease. J Genet Counsel, 9, 15–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Timman, R., Roos, R., Maat-Kiever, A., & Tibben, A. (2004). Adverse effects of predictive testing for Huntington’s Disease underestimated: Long-term effects 7–10 years after the test, Health Psych, 23, 189–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Viorst, J. (1986). Necessary losses. Fireside books. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  25. Winnicott, D. W. (1988). Human nature. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Genetic Health Services VictoriaRoyal Childrens HospitalMelbourne, VictoriaAustralia
  2. 2.Genetic Health Services VictoriaVictoriaAustralia

Personalised recommendations