Journal of Genetic Counseling

, Volume 14, Issue 5, pp 395–407

Who Are the Next Generation of Genetic Counselors? A Survey of Students

  • Melanie Lega
  • Patricia McCarthy Veach
  • Erin E. Ward
  • Bonnie S. LeRoy
Original Research

Abstract

Genetic counseling students were surveyed about their backgrounds, application process to genetic counseling programs, and career motivations and plans. Program directors from 27 accredited programs were asked to distribute 362 surveys to students. Fifty-two survey items assess demographics; sources of support for pursuing a genetic counseling career (information about genetic counseling, encouragement/discouragement from others); career motivations (reasons for applying and for becoming a genetic counselor); and career certainty. Two hundred and thirty-five usable surveys were returned (64.9% usable return rate). Most respondents were Caucasian females (mean age = 25.4 years). About 13% identified as ethnic minorities, and about one-third reported family histories of a genetic condition(s). Most respondents learned about the field in classes, and most were strongly encouraged by family and friends to pursue genetic counseling. Reasons rated as most important for becoming a genetic counselor included helping others and intellectual stimulation. Recruitment, training, and research recommendations are given.

Key Words

genetic counseling students career motives career plans student characteristics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Butler, W. T., Thomson, W. A., Morrissey, C. T., Miller, L. M., & Smith, Q. W. (1991). Baylor's program to attract minority students and others to science and medicine. Acad Med, 66, 305–311.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychol Bull, 112, 155–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Crossley, M. L., & Mubarik, A. (2002). A comparative investigation of dental and medical student's motivation towards career choice. Brit Dental J, 193, 471–473.Google Scholar
  4. DeLeon, P. (2003, August). Psychology's societal responsibility—A challenge to MPA. Minnesota Psychol, 15–16.Google Scholar
  5. DiCaccavo, A. (2002). Investigating individuals' motivations to become counselling psychologists: The influence of early caretaking roles within the family. Profess Psychol. Theory Res Practice, 75, 463–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gallup, G., Jr., & Lindsay, D. M. (1999). Surveying the religious landscape: Trends in U.S. beliefs. Harrisburg, PA: Morehouse.Google Scholar
  7. Gambles, M., Wilkinson, S. M., & Dissanayake, C. (2003). What are you like? A personality profile of cancer and palliative care nurses in the United Kingdom. Cancer Nurs, 26, 97–104.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hallissey, J., Hannigan, A., & Ray, N. (2000). Reasons for choosing dentistry as a career—A survey of dental students attending a dental school in Ireland during 1998–1999. Eur J Dental Educ, 4, 77–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hyppola, H., Kumpusalo, E., Neittaanmaki, L., Mattila, K., Virjo, I., Kujala, S., Luhtala, R., Halila, H., & Isokoski, M. (1998). Becoming a doctor—Was it the wrong career choice? Soc Sci Med, 47, 1383–1387.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Jenkins, S. R. (1987). Need for achievement and women's careers over 14 years: Evidence for occupational structure effects. J Person Soc Psychol, 53, 922–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jensen-Arnett, D. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the 20's. Amer Psychol, 55, 469–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Parrott, S., Clark, C., & Mahoney, S. K. (2002). National Society of Genetic Counselors, Inc. Professional Status Survey. Wallingford, PA.Google Scholar
  13. Peters, E., McCarthy Veach, P., Ward, E., & LeRoy, B. S. (2004). Does genetic counseling impact genetic counselor practice? J Genet Counsel, 13, 387–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Taylor, V. S., Erwin, K. W., Ghose, M., & Perry-Thornton, E. (2001). Models to increase enrollment of minority females in science-based careers. J Natl Med Assoc, 93, 74–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Wahlstein, D. (1991). Sample size to detect a planned contrast and a one-degree of freedom interaction. Psychol Bull, 110, 587–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Melanie Lega
    • 1
  • Patricia McCarthy Veach
    • 2
  • Erin E. Ward
    • 3
  • Bonnie S. LeRoy
    • 4
  1. 1.Division of Laboratory Genetics, Cytogenetics LaboratoryMayo ClinicRochester
  2. 2.Department of Educational PsychologyUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolis
  3. 3.Department of Educational PsychologyUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolis
  4. 4.Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, Institute of Human GeneticsUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolis

Personalised recommendations