Advertisement

Journal of Family Violence

, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 43–52 | Cite as

“It Helped a Lot to Go Over it”: Intimate Partner Violence Research Risks and Benefits from Participating in an 18-month Longitudinal Study

  • L. Kevin HambergerEmail author
  • Sadie Larsen
  • Bruce Ambuel
Original Article

Abstract

In conducting research with a vulnerable population, researchers must assure that benefits of research outweigh costs. The present study qualitatively examined intimate partner violence (IPV) survivors’ experiences of participating in an 18-month, longitudinal study of IPV screening and intervention within a primary healthcare setting. A structured interview was administered to 24 participants who completed their 18-month study interview and assessment. The structured interview queried changes made, safety risks during study participation, and advice for researchers. Most participants reported making positive changes in their lives during study participation, often partially attributing the changes to study participation. In particular, participants spoke to the importance of talking about the abuse with trusted others, gaining increased awareness and information about IPV and resources, and recognizing that they were capable of change. Feedback about the study experience was largely neutral or positive, with only one hypothetical safety worry raised. We conclude that the potential benefits to study participation outweigh potential costs. These findings suggest that research with IPV survivors can be designed to address IRB concerns about risks to participants and cost-benefit analyses of research participation.

Keywords

Intimate partner violence IPV screening Research risks Study participation Research ethics Vulnerable populations Participant reactions IPV research 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by grants from the Healthier Wisconsin Partnership Program Foundation #2004II-0088, B. Ambuel, P. I., and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention R49/CE0011754, L. K. Hamberger, P. I. This paper is partially the result of work supported with resources and the use of facilities at the Clement J. Zablocki VAMC, Milwaukee, WI.

References

  1. Ambuel, B., Hamberger, L.K., Giuse, C.E., Melzer-Lange, M., Phelan, M.B., & Kistner, A. (2013). Healthcare can change from within: Sustained improvement in the healthcare response to intimate partner violence. Journal of Family Violence, 28, 833–847.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-013-9550-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Black, M. C., Kresnow, M., Simon, T. R., Arias, I., & Shelley, G. (2006). Telephone survey respondents’ reactions to questions regarding interpersonal violence. Violence and Victims, 21, 455–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Breiding, M.J., Chen , J., & Black, M.C. (2014). Intimate partner violence in the United States -- 2010. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and COntrol, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Google Scholar
  4. DePrince, A. P., & Freyd, J. J. (2004). Costs and benefits of being asked about trauma history. Journal of Trauma Practice, 3, 23–35.  https://doi.org/10.1300/J189v03n04_02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Edwards, K. M., Kearns, M. C., Calhoun, K. S., & Gidycz, C. A. (2009). College women’s reactions to sexual assault research participation: Is it distressing? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 225–234 doi: 0361-6843/09.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Edwards, K. M., Probst, D. R., Tansill, E. C., & Gidycz, C. A. (2013). Women’s reactions to interpersonal violence research: A longitudinal study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28, 254–272.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260512454721.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Griffin, M. G., Resick, P. A., Waldrop, A. E., & Mechanic, M. B. (2003). Participation in trauma research: Is there evidence of harm? Journal of Traumatic Stress, 16, 221–227 doi: 0894-9867/03/0600-0221/1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hamberger, L.K., Ambuel, B., Guse, C.E., Phelan, M.B., Melzer-Lange, M., & Kistner, A. (2014). Effecrts of a systems change model to respond to patients experiencing partner violence in primary care medical settings. Journal of Family Violence, 29, 581–594.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-014-9616-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.  https://doi.org/10.1177/104973230-5276687.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Johnson, L. E., & Benight, C. C. (2003). Effects of trauma-focused research on recent domestic violence survivors. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 16, 567–571 doi: 0894-9867/03/1200-0567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jorm, A. F., Kelly, C. M., & Morgan, A. J. (2007). Participant distress in psychiatric research: A systematic review. Psychological Medicine, 37, 917–926.  https://doi.org/10.1017/SOO33291706009779.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kuyper, L., de Wit, J., Adam, P., & Woertman, L. (2012). Doing more harm than good? The effects of participation in sex research on young people in the Netherlands. Archives of Sex Behavior, 41, 497–506.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9780-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Labott, S. M., Johnson, T. P., Fendrich, M., & Feeny, N. C. (2013). Emotional risks to respondents in survey research: Some empirical evidence. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 8, 53–66.  https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2013.8.4.53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Rojas, A., & Kinder, B. N. (2007). Effects of completing sexual questionnaires in males and females with histories of childhood sexual abuse: Implications for institutional review boards. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 33, 193–201.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00926230701267795.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Rosenbaum, A., & Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (2006). Meta-research on violence and victims: The impact of data collection methods on findings and participants. Violence and Victims, 21, 404–409.  https://doi.org/10.1891/vivi.21.4.404.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Savell, J. K., Kinder, B. N., & Young, S. (2006). Effects of administering sexually explicit questionnaires on anger, anxiety, and depression in sexually abused and nonabused females: Implications for risk assessment. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 32, 161–172.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00926230500442326.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Sikweyiya, Y., & Jewkes, R. (2012). Perceptions and experiences of research participants on gender-based violence community based survey: Implications for ethical guidelines. PLosOne, 7(4), 1–8 e35495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Spatz-Widom, C., & Czaja, S. J. (2005). Reactions to research participation in vulnerable subgroups. Accountability in Research, 12, 115–138.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08989620590957193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Kevin Hamberger
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Sadie Larsen
    • 3
    • 4
  • Bruce Ambuel
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Family and Community MedicineMedical College of WisconsinMilwaukeeUSA
  2. 2.Ascension All Saints Family Care CenterMilwaukeeUSA
  3. 3.Milwaukee VA Medical CenterMilwaukeeUSA
  4. 4.Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral MedicineMedical College of WisconsinMilwaukeeUSA

Personalised recommendations