Journal of Family Violence

, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp 231–243 | Cite as

Civil Protection Orders and their Courtroom Context: the Impact of Gatekeepers on Legal Decisions

  • Alexa BejinariuEmail author
  • Emily I. Troshynski
  • Terance D. Miethe
Original Article


Using observational data obtained from a sample of 303 protection order hearings in a large Southwestern city, the current study explores the impact of formal (i.e., presiding Hearing Master, legal counsel, courtroom-employed translator) and informal actors (i.e., victim advocate, family members, friends) on civil protection order (CPO) decisions. Several multivariate analyses were conducted to assess the net and context-specific effects of these legal and informal actors on the likelihood of receiving an order of protection and its length of time. When examining the effectiveness of courtroom actors in assisting domestic violence (DV)/ intimate partner violence (IPV) victims with their CPO cases, this study finds that whether or not a victim successfully obtains a protection order, and for how long, depends on a range of case attributes as well as who is actually present in the courtroom with the victim. As these findings suggest, gatekeepers matter depending on a range of case attributes. States should allocate additional resources and funding to non-profit agencies to continue to promote affordable/free legal services through legal aid and other similar legal entities as well as offer continued support for victim advocacy and self-help centers.


Domestic violence Intimate partner violence Civil protection orders Civil court Courtroom context Gatekeepers 


  1. Abel, L. (2009). Language access in state courts. NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper, 10, 10.Google Scholar
  2. Agnew-Brune, C., Moracco, K. E. B., Person, C. J., & Bowling, J. M. (2015). Domestic violence protective orders: A qualitative examination of judges’ decision-making processes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence.
  3. Angel, M. (1990). Sexual harassment by judges. U. Miami L. Rev., 45, 817.Google Scholar
  4. Bell, M. E., & Goodman, L. A. (2001). Supporting battered women involved with the court system: An evaluation of a law school-based advocacy intervention. Violence Against Women, 7(12), 1377–1404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bell, M. E., Perez, S., Goodman, L. A., & Dutton, M. A. (2011). Battered women’s perceptions of civil and criminal court helpfulness: The role of court outcome and process. Violence Against Women, 17(1), 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Black, M. C., Basile, K. C., Breiding, M. J., Smith, S. G., Walters, M. L., Merrick, M. T., Chen, J., & Stevens, M. R. (2011). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 Summary Report. Atlanta: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Google Scholar
  7. Bolton, S. C., & Muzio, D. (2007). Can't live with 'Em; Can't live without 'Em: Gendered segmentation in the legal profession. Sociology, 41(1), 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burgess-Proctor, A. (2003). Evaluating the efficacy of protection orders for victims of domestic violence. Women & Criminal Justice, 15, 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Camacho, C. M. (2008). The significance of the victim advocate for domestic violence victims in municipal court. Violence and Victims, 23(3), 288–300. Scholar
  10. Coulter, M. L., Alexander, A., & Harrison, V. (2007). Specialized domestic violence courts. Women & Criminal Justice, 16(3), 91–106. Scholar
  11. Cramer, E. P. (1999). Variables that predict verdicts in domestic violence cases. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(11), 1137–1150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crawford, J. (2007). The decline of bilingual education: How to reverse a troubling trend? International Multilingual Research Journal, 1, 33–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crocker, D. (2005). Regulating intimacy: Judicial discourse in cases of wife assault (1970 to 2000). Violence Against Women, 11(2), 197–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Czapanskiy, K. (1990). Gender bias in the courts: Social change strategies. Georgetown Journal Legal Ethics, 4, 1.Google Scholar
  15. Czapanskiy, K. (1993). Domestic violence, the family, and the lawyering process: Lessons from studies on gender bias in the courts. Family Law Quarterly, 27, 247.Google Scholar
  16. DeJong, C., & Burgess-Proctor, A. (2006). A summary of personal protection order statutes in the United States. Violence Against Women, 12(1), 68–88. Scholar
  17. Diviney, C. L., Parekh, A., & Olson, L. M. (2008). Outcomes of civil protective orders – Results from one state. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(7), 1209–1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Durfee, A. (2009). Victim narratives, legal representation, and domestic violence civil protection orders. Feminist Criminology, 4, 7–31. Scholar
  19. Durfee, A., & Messing, J. T. (2012). Characteristics related to protection order use among victims of intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 18(6), 701–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eigenberg, H., McGuffee, K., Berry, P., & Hall, W. H. (2003). Protective order legislation: Trends in state statutes. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31, 411–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975).Google Scholar
  22. Finn, P., & Colson, S. (1990). Civil protection orders: Legislation, current court practice, and enforcement. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
  23. Fischer, K., & Rose, M. (1995). When “enough is enough”: Battered women’s decision making around court orders of protection. Crime & Delinquency, 41, 414–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fleury-Steiner, R. E., Miller, S. L., Maloney, S., & Postel, E. B. (2014). “No contact, except…” visitation decisions in protection orders for intimate partner abuse. Feminist Criminology, 11(1), 3–22. Scholar
  25. Ford, J., Rompf, E. L., Faragher, T., & Weisenfluh, S. (1995). Case outcomes in domestic violence court: Influence of judges. Psychological Reports, 77(2), 587–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goldfarb, S. F. (2008). Reconceiving civil protection orders for domestic violence: Can law help end the abuse without ending the relationship? Cardozo Law Review, 29, 1487.Google Scholar
  27. Gondolf, E. W., McWilliams, J., Hart, B., & Stuehling, J. (1994). Court response to petitions for civil protection orders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 9(4), 503–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Goodman, L. A., Thomas, K., Cattaneo, L. B., Heimel, D., Woulfe, J., & Chong, S. K. (2016). Survivor-defined practice in domestic violence work measure development and preliminary evidence of link to empowerment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31, 163–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grauwiler, P. (2008). Voices of women: Perspectives on decision-making and the management of partner violence. Children and Youth Services Review, 30(3), 311–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hartman, J. L., & Belknap, J. (2003). Beyond the gatekeepers: Court professionals' self-reported attitudes about and experiences with misdemeanor domestic violence cases. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30, 349–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Holt, V., Kernic, M. A., Wolf, M. E., & Rivara, F. P. (2003). Do protection orders affect the likelihood of future partner violence and injury? American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 24(1), 16–21. Scholar
  32. Kanuha, V. K., & Ross, M. L. (2004). The use of temporary restraining orders (TROs) as a strategy to address intimate partner violence. Violence and Victims, 19(3), 343–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Keilitz, S. (1994). Civil protection orders: A viable justice system tool for deterring domestic violence. Violence and Victims, 9(1), 79–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Keilitz, S. (2002). Improving judicial system responses to domestic violence. Handbook of domestic violence intervention strategies: Policies, programs, and legal remedies, 147.Google Scholar
  35. Lemon, N. K. (2006). Access to justice: Can domestic violence courts better address the need of non-English speaking victims of domestic violence. Berkeley Journal of Gender, Law and Justice, 21, 38.Google Scholar
  36. Liang, B., Goodman, L., Tummala-Narra, P., & Weintraub, S. (2005). A theoretical framework for understanding help-seeking processes among survivors of intimate partner violence. American Journal of Community Psychology, 36(1–2), 71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Logan, T. K., & Walker, R. (2009). Civil protection order outcomes: Violations and perceptions of effectiveness. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24, 675–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Logan, T. K., Shannon, L., Walker, R., & Faragher, T. M. (2006). Protective orders: Questions and conundrums. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 7(3), 175–205. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Logan, T. K., Cole, J., Shannon, L., & Walker, R. (2007). Relationship characteristics and protective orders among a diverse sample of women. Journal of Family Violence, 22(4), 237–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lucken, K., & Rosky, J. (2016). Making the grade: Judicial behavior in civil protection order hearings for intimate partner violence. International Review of Victimology, 22(3), 269–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lucken, K., Rosky, J. W., & Watkins, C. (2015). She said, he said, judge said: Analyzing judicial decision making in civil protection order hearings. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(12), 2038–2066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. MacDowell, E. L. (2016). Domestic violence and the politics of self-help. William & Mary Journal of Women & the Law, 22, 203–256.Google Scholar
  43. Malecha, A., McFarlane, J., Gist, J., Watson, K., Batten, E., Hall, I., & Smith, S. (2003). Applying for and dropping a protection order: A study with 150 women. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 14(4), 486–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Marshall, A. (2005). Idle rights: Employees' rights consciousness and the construction of sexual harassment policies. Law and Society Review, 39, 83–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Merry, S. E. (2003). Rights talk and the experience of law: Implementing women’s human rights to protection from violence. Human Rights Quarterly, 25(2), 343–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Moe, A. M. (2007). Silenced voices and structured survival: Battered women's help seeking. Violence Against Women, 13(7), 676–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Moracco, K. E., Andersen, K., Buchanan, R. M., Espersen, C., Bowling, J. M., & Duffy, C. (2010). Who are the defendants in domestic violence protection order cases? Violence Against Women, 16(11), 1201–1223. Scholar
  48. Patton, P. A. (2004). Women lawyers, their status, influence, and retention in the legal profession. Wm. & Mary J. Women & L, 11, 173.Google Scholar
  49. Ptacek, J. (1999). Battered women in the courtroom: The power of judicial responses. UPNE.Google Scholar
  50. Richards, T. N., Tudor, A., & Gover, A. R. (2017). An Updated Assessment of Personal Protective Order Statutes in the United States: Have Statutes Become More Progressive in the Past Decade? Violence Against Women.
  51. Russell, B. (2012). Effectiveness, victim safety, characteristics, and enforcement of protective orders. Partner Abuse, 3(4), 531–552. Scholar
  52. Sorenson, S. B., & Shen, H. (2005). Restraining orders in California: A look at statewide data. Violence Against Women, 11(7), 912–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sylaska, K. M., & Edwards, K. M. (2014). Disclosure of intimate partner violence to informal social support network members: A review of the literature. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 15(1), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tjaden, P. G., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence: Findings from the National Violence against Women Survey. Vol. 181867. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Trinch, S. L. (2001). The advocate as gatekeeper: The limits of politeness in protective order interviews with Latina survivors of domestic abuse. Journal of SocioLinguistics, 5(4), 475–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Trinch, S. L. (2003). Latinas' narratives of domestic abuse: Discrepant versions of violence (Impact Studies in Language and Society, Vol. 17). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  57. Trinch, S. L., & Berk-Seligson, S. (2002). Narrating in protective order interviews: A source of interactional trouble. Language in Society, 31(3), 383–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Trotter, J. L., & Allen, N. E. (2009). The good, the bad, and the ugly: Domestic violence survivors’ experiences with their informal sources. American Journal of Community Psychology, 43, 221–231. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vittes, K. A., & Sorenson, S. B. (2006). Are temporary restraining orders more likely to be issued when applications mention firearms? Evaluation Review, 30(3), 266–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Weisz, A. N., Tolman, R. M., Callahan, M. R., Saunders, D. G., & Black, B. M. (2007). Informal helpers’ responses when adolescents tell them about dating violence or romantic relationship problems. Journal of Adolescence, 30, 853–868. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Criminal JusticeUniversity of NevadaLas VegasUSA

Personalised recommendations