Advertisement

Journal of Family Violence

, Volume 31, Issue 8, pp 967–971 | Cite as

The Social Construction of Roles in Intimate Partner Violence: Is the Victim/Perpetrator Model the only Viable one?

  • C. E. B. CannonEmail author
  • F. P. Buttell
Original Article

Abstract

This article addresses controversies in the field over LGBTQ intimate partner violence by describing the scope of the problem, employing both the traditional feminist paradigm and poststructuralist feminist theoretical approach to frame the problem, and, lastly, provide suggestions for advancing the field using interdisciplinary theories and methods. Implications for the field, policy, and treatment of victims and perpetrators of LGBTQ intimate partner violence are discussed.

Keywords

LGBTQ Physical violence Feminist paradigm Post-structuralist feminist theory Heteronormativity 

References

  1. Archer, J. (2002). Sex differences in physically aggressive acts between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 313–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker, N., Buick, J., Kim, S., Moniz, S., & Nava, K. (2013). Lessons from examining same-sex intimate partner violence. Sex Roles, 69, 182–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beste, J. (2006). The limits of Poststructuralism for feminist theology. Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion 22(1), 5–19.Google Scholar
  4. Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Cannon, C. E. B., & Buttell, F. (2015). Illusion of inclusion: The failure of the gender paradigm to account for IPV in LGBT relationships. Partner Abuse, 6(1), 65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cannon, C. E. B., Lauve-Moon, K., & Buttell, F. (2015). Re-theorizing Intimate Partner Violence through Post-structural Feminism, Queer theory, and the Sociology of Gender. Social Sciences, 4(3), 668–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cannon, C. E. B., Hamel, J., Buttell, F., & Ferreira, R. (2016). A Survey of Domestic Violence Perpetrator Programs in the U.S. and Canada: Findings and Implications for Policy and Intervention. Partner Abuse, 7(3), 226–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coleman, J. (2009). An introduction to feminisms in a postfeminist age. Women’s Studies. Journal, 23(2), 3–13.Google Scholar
  9. Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combatting Violence Against Women and Domestic Violence. (2014). Accessed 3 Sept 2016. https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=090000168008482e
  10. Dobash, R. P., Dobash, R. E., Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1992). The myth of sexual symmetry in marital violence. Social Problems, 39, 71–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eckhardt, C. I., Murhpy, C. M., Whitaker, D. J., Sprunger, J., Dykstra, R., & Woodard, K. (2013). The effectiveness of intervention programs for perpetrators and victims of intimate partner violence. Partner Abuse, 4(2), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferreira, R. J., & Buttell, F. (2016). Can a “Psychosocial Model” help explain violence perpetrated by female batterers?”. Research on Social Work Practice, 26(4), 362–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality: An introduction. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  14. Friedman, S., S. (1991). Post/Poststructuralist Feminist Criticism: The Politics of Recuperation and Negotiation. New Literary History, 22(2), 465–490.Google Scholar
  15. Frye, M. (1983). The Politics of Reality: Essays in Feminist Theory. Trumansburg, NY: The Crossing Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hamby, S. (2009). The gender debate about intimate partner violence: Solutions and dead ends. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 1(1), 24–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hamel, J. (2014). Gender-inclusive treatment of intimate partner abuse. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  18. Hellemans, S., Loeys, T., Buysse, A., Dewaele, A., & De Smet, O. (2015). Intimate Partner Violence Victimization Among Non-Heterosexuals: Prevalence and Associations With Mental and Sexual Well-Being. Journal of Family Violence, 30(2), 171–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson, M. P. (2008). A typology of domestic violence: Intimate terrorism, violent resistance, and situational couple violence. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (2010). Controversies involving gender and intimate partner violence in the United States. Sex Roles, 62, 179–193.Google Scholar
  21. Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., Misra, T., Selwyn, C., & Rohling, M. (2012). Rates of bidirectional versus unidirectional intimate partner violence across samples, sexual orientations, and race/ethnicities: A comprehensive review. Partner Abuse, 3(2), 1–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Maiuro, R., & Eberle, J. (2008). State standards for domestic violence perpetrator treatment: Current status, trends, and recommendations. Violence and Victims, 23(2), 133–155.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Mason, T. B., Lewis, R., Milletich, R., Kelley, M., Minifie, J., & Derlega, V. (2014). "Psychological aggression in lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals’ intimate relationships: A review of prevalence, correlates, and measurement issues." Aggression and Violent Behavior 19(3): 219–234.Google Scholar
  24. Mohanty, C. T. (1988). Under western eyes. Feminist scholarship and colonial discourse. Feminist Review, 61–88.Google Scholar
  25. Seidman, S. (1996). Queer Theory/Sociology. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  26. Smooth, W. (2013). Intersectionality from theoretical framework to policy intervention. In R. A. Wildon (Ed.), Situating Intersectionality. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  27. Storey, J., & Strand, S. (2012). The characteristics and violence risk management of women arrested by the police for intimate partner violence. European Journal of Criminology, 9(6), 636–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Swan, S. C., Gambone, L. J., Caldwell, J. E., Sullivan, T. P., & Snow, D. L. (2008). A review of research on women’s use of violence with male intimate partners. Violence and Victims, 23(3), 301.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Walters, M., Chen, J., & Breiding, M. (2013, January). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey(NISVS): 2010 findings on victimization by sexual orientation. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Google Scholar
  30. West, C. (2012). Partner abuse in ethnic minority and gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender populations. Partner Abuse, 3(3), 336–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. White, K., & Dutton, D. (2013). Male victims of domestic violence. New Male Studies: An International Journal, 2(1), 5–17.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Liberal ArtsTulane UniversityNew OrleansUSA
  2. 2.School of Social WorkTulane UniversityNew OrleansUSA

Personalised recommendations