Journal of Family Violence

, Volume 31, Issue 5, pp 549–555 | Cite as

A Preliminary Evaluation of the Spanish Parent–Child Aggression Acceptability Movie Task in Spain

  • Christina M. RodriguezEmail author
  • Enrique Gracia
  • Marisol Lila
Original Article


The current study presents a preliminary evaluation of a Spanish adaptation of an implicit analog procedure, the Parent–child Aggression Acceptability Movie task (Spanish Parent-CAAM). Based on Social Information Processing theory, Spanish Parent-CAAM scores were expected to relate to self-reported PCA attitudes, negative child attributions, and child abuse risk in Spanish students; 245 undergraduates in Spain completed the Spanish Parent-CAAM along with self-report measures of PCA attitudes, negative children attributions, inclination to punish misbehavior, and child abuse risk. Findings indicate Spanish Parent-CAAM scores were significantly related to explicit measures of PCA, attributions of intentional child misbehavior, propensity to punish such misbehavior, and increased child abuse potential. Results are considered within the cultural context of Spain’s corporal punishment ban and PCA attitudes.


Child abuse risk Analog tasks Hostile attributions Social information processing Physical discipline beliefs 


  1. Ateah, C. A., & Durrant, J. E. (2005). Maternal use of physical punishment in response to child misbehavior: implications for child abuse prevention. Child Abuse & Neglect, 29, 169–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bavolek, S. J., & Keene, R. G. (2001). Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory (AAPI-2): administration and development handbook. Park City: Family Development Resources, Inc.Google Scholar
  3. Berlin, L. J., Dodge, K. A., & Reznick, J. S. (2013). Examining pregnant women’s hostile attributions about infants as a predictor of offspring maltreatment. JAMA Pediatrics, 167, 549–553.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Conners, N. A., Whiteside-Mansell, L., Deere, D., Ledet, T., & Edwards, M. C. (2006). Measuring the potential for maltreatment: the reliability and validity of the Adult Adolescent Parenting Inventory-2. Child Abuse & Neglect, 30, 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. de Paúl, J., Milner, J. S., & Múgica, P. (1995). Childhood maltreatment, childhood social support, and child abuse potential in a Basque sample. Child Abuse & Neglect, 19(8), 907–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. de Paúl, J., Asla, N., Pérez-Albéniz, A., & de Cádiz, B. T. (2006a). Impact of stress and mitigating information on evaluations, attributions, affect, disciplinary choices, and expectations of compliance in mothers at high and low risk for child physical abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21, 1018–1045.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. de Paúl, J., Pérez-Albéniz, A., Ormaechea, A., Vergara, A., & de Cádiz, B. T. (2006b). Aggression inhibition in high- and low-risk subjects for child physical abuse: effects of a child’s hostile intent and the presence of mitigating information. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 216–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Direccion General de Servicios para la Familia y la Infancia. (2014). Boletín de datos estadísticos de medidas de protección a la infancia (Datos 2012). In Observatorio de la Infancia :Boletín estadístico 15. Madrid: Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad. Retrieved from
  9. Farc, M. M., Crouch, J. L., Skowronski, J. J., & Milner, J. S. (2008). Hostility ratings by parents at risk for child abuse: impact of chronic and temporary schema activation. Child Abuse & Neglect, 32, 177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297–327.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Frechette, S., Zorrati, M., & Romano, E. (2015). What is the link between corporal punishment and child physical abuse. Journal of Family Violence. doi: 10.1007/s10896-014-9663-9.Google Scholar
  12. García, F., & Gracia, E. (2009). Is always authoritative the optimum parenting style? Evidence from Spanish families. Adolescence, 44(173), 101–131.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. García, F., & Gracia, E. (2014). The indulgent parenting style and developmental outcomes in South European and Latin American countries. In H. Selin (Ed.), Parenting across cultures: childrearing, motherhood and fatherhood in non-Western cultures (Vol. 7, pp. 419–433). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Gershoff, E. T. (2008). Report on physical punishment in the United States: what research tells us about its effects on children. Columbus: Center for Effective Discipline.Google Scholar
  15. Gershoff, E. T., & Bitensky, S. H. (2007). The case against corporal punishment of children: converging evidence from social science research and international human rights law and implications for U.S. public policy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 13, 231–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gracia, E., & Herrero, J. (2008a). Beliefs in the necessity of corporal punishment of children and public perceptions of child physical abuse as a social problem. Child Abuse & Neglect, 32, 1058–1062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gracia, E., & Herrero, J. (2008b). Is it considered violence? The acceptability of physical punishment of children in Europe. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 210–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Graziano, A. M. (1994). Why we should study subabusive violence against children. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 9, 412–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Graziano, A. M., Lindquist, C. M., Kunce, L. J., & Munjal, K. (1992). Physical punishment in childhood and current attitudes: an exploratory comparison of college students in the United States and India. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 7, 147–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Greenwald, R. L., Bank, L., Reid, J. B., & Knutson, J. F. (1997). A discipline-mediated model of excessively punitive parenting. Aggressive Behavior, 23, 259–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Haskett, M. E., Scott, S. S., Willoughby, M., Ahern, L., & Nears, K. (2006). The parent opinion questionnaire and child vignettes for use with abusive parents: assessment of psychometric properties. Journal of Family Violence, 21, 137–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Herrenkohl, R. C., Herrenkohl, E. C., & Egolf, B. P. (1983). Circumstances surrounding the occurrence of child maltreatment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 424–431.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Holden, G. W. (2001). Attitude toward spanking (ATS). In J. Touliatos, B. R. Perlmutter, & G. W. Holden (Eds.), Abstracts: Vol. 2. Handbook of family measurement techniques (p. 209). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Jackson, S., Thompson, R. A., Christiansen, E. H., Colman, R. A., Wyatt, J., Buckendahl, C. W., Wilcox, B. L., & Peterson, R. (1999). Predicting abuse-prone parental attitudes and discipline practices in a nationally representative sample. Child Abuse & Neglect, 23, 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kadushin, A., & Martin, J. A. (1981). Interview study of abuse‐event interaction. In A. Kadushin (Ed.), Child abuse: an interactional event (pp. 141–224). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Kelley, M. L., Grace, N., & Elliott, S. N. (1990). Acceptability of positive and punitive discipline methods: comparisons among abusive, potentially abusive, and nonabusive parents. Child Abuse & Neglect, 14, 219–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee, S. J., Grogan-Kaylor, A., & Berger, L. M. (2014). Parental spanking of 1-year-old children and subsequent child protective services involvement. Child Abuse & Neglect, 38, 875–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Milner, J. S. (1993). Social information processing and physical child abuse. Clinical Psychology Review, 13, 275–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Milner, J. S. (1994). Assessing physical child abuse risk: the child abuse potential inventory. Clinical Psychology Review, 14, 547–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Milner, J. S. (2000). Social information processing and child physical abuse: Theory and research. In D. J. Hansen (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation, Vo. 46, 1998: motivation and child maltreatment (pp. 39–84). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  31. Montes, M. P., de Paúl, J., & Milner, J. S. (2001). Evaluations, attributions, affect, and disciplinary choices in mothers at high and low risk for child physical abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 25, 1015–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mulvaney, M. K., & Mebert, C. J. (2010). Stress appraisal and attitudes towards corporal punishment as intervening processes between corporal punishment and subsequent mental health. Journal of Family Violence, 25, 401–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Narang, D. S., & Contreras, J. M. (2000). Dissociation as a mediator between child abuse history and adult abuse potential. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24, 653–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nosek, B. A. (2007). Understanding the individual implicitly and explicitly. International Journal of Psychology, 42, 184–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Okado, Y., & Azar, S. T. (2011). The impact of extreme emotional distance in the mother-child relationship on the offspring’s future risk of maltreatment perpetration. Journal of Family Violence, 26, 439–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Plotkin, R. (1983). Cognitive mediation in disciplinary actions among mothers who have abused or neglected their children: dispositional and environmental factors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Rochester.Google Scholar
  37. Rodriguez, C. M. (2010). Parent–child aggression: association with child abuse potential and parenting styles. Violence and Victims, 25, 728–741.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Rodriguez, C. M., & Price, B. L. (2004). Attributions and discipline history as predictors of child abuse potential and future discipline practices. Child Abuse & Neglect, 28, 845–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rodriguez, C. M., Bower-Russa, M., & Harmon, N. (2011). Assessing abuse risk beyond self-report: analog task of acceptability of parent–child aggression. Child Abuse & Neglect, 35, 199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sedlak, A. J., Mettenburg, J., Basena, M., Petta, I., McPherson, K., Greene, A., & Li, S. (2010). Fourth National Incidence Study of child abuse and neglect (NIS–4): report to congress, executive summary. Washington: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved from
  41. Straus, M. A. (2001a). Beating the devil out of them: corporal punishment in American families and its effects on children. New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
  42. Straus, M. A. (2001b). New evidence for the benefits of never spanking. Society, 38, 52–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Straus, M. A., & Stewart, J. H. (1999). Corporal punishment by American parents: national data on prevalence, chronicity, severity, and duration, in relation to child and family characteristics. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 2, 55–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Trickett, P. K., & Susman, E. J. (1988). Parental perceptions of child-rearing practices in physically abusive and nonabusive families. Developmental Psychology, 24, 270–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Voorthuis, A., Bhandari, R., Out, D., van der Veen, R., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & Van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2014). Childhood maltreatment experiences and child abuse potential: temperamental sensitivity as moderator? Journal of Family Violence, 29, 749–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Weisz, J. R., Sandler, I. N., Durlak, J. A., & Anton, B. S. (2005). Promoting and protecting youth mental health through evidence-based prevention and treatment. American Psychologist, 60, 628–648.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Whipple, E. E., & Richey, C. A. (1997). Crossing the line from physical discipline to child abuse: How much is too much? Child Abuse & Neglect, 5, 431–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zolotor, A. J., Theodore, A. D., Chang, J. J., Berkoff, M. C., & Runyan, D. K. (2008). Speak softly—and forget the stick: corporal punishment and child physical abuse. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35, 364–369.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamUSA
  2. 2.Department of Social PsychologyUniversity of ValenciaValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations