Advertisement

Journal of Family Violence

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 191–202 | Cite as

Theoretical Considerations on Men’s Experiences of Intimate Partner Violence: An Interview-Based Study

  • Lotta NyberghEmail author
  • Viveka Enander
  • Gunilla Krantz
Original Article

Abstract

This study aims at exploring and interpreting men’s experiences of intimate partner violence (IPV) in the light of selected current theoretical contributions to the field, with an emphasis on Michael P. Johnson’s violence typology. The material consisted of twenty interviews with men who self-identified as having been subjected to IPV. Men generally did not consider physical violence to be threatening when it was perpetrated by women. They were also not subjected to the multiple control tactics that define the intimate terrorism category of Johnson’s violence typology, lending support to the argument that women’s and men’s experiences of IPV differ in opposite-sex relationships. Furthermore, our findings encourage the integration of structural inequalities related to gender and sexuality in analyses of men’s experiences of IPV.

Keywords

Intimate partner violence Qualitative study Men Johnson’s violence typology Gender symmetry Male victims 

References

  1. Allen-Collinson, J. (2009). A marked man: Female-perpetrated intimate partner abuse. International Journal of Men’s Health, 8(1), 22–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2008). Tolkning och reflektion: Vetenskapsfilosofi och kvalitativ metod (interpretation and reflection: Philosophy of science and qualitative method). Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, K. L. (2002). Perpetrator or victim? Relationships between intimate partner violence and well Being. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64(4), 851–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, K. L. (2005). Theorizing gender in intimate partner violence research. Sex Roles, 52(11), 853–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, K. L. (2007). Who gets out? Gender and Society, 21(2), 173–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anderson, K. L. (2009). Gendering coercive control. Violence Against Women, 15(12), 1444–1457.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Anderson, K. L., & Umberson, D. (2001). Gendering violence. Masculinity and power in men’s accounts of domestic violence. Gender and Society, 15(3), 358–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ansara, D. L., & Hindin, M. J. (2010). Exploring gender differences in the patterns of intimate partner violence in Canada: A latent class approach. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 64(10), 849–854.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bair-Merritt, M. H., Shea Crowne, S., Thompson, D. A., Sibinga, E., Trent, M., & Campbell, J. (2010). Why do women use intimate partner violence? A systematic review of women’s motivations. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 11(4), 178–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Caldwell, J. E., Swan, S. C., & Woodbrown, V. D. (2012). Gender differences in intimate partner violence outcomes. Psychology of Violence, 2(10), 42–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carney, M., Buttell, F., & Dutton, D. (2007). Women who perpetrate intimate partner violence: A review of the literature with recommendations for treatment. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12(1), 108–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender and Society, 19(1), 829–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dobash, R. P., & Dobash, R. E. (2004). Women’s violence to men in intimate relationships. British Journal of Criminology, 44(3), 324–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Douglas, E. M., Hines, D. A., & McCarthy, S. C. (2012). Men who sustain female-to-male partner violence: Factors associated with where they seek help and how they rate those resources. Violence and Victims, 27(6), 871–894.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dutton, M. A., & Goodman, L. A. (2005). Coercion in intimate partner violence: Toward a new conceptualization. Sex Roles, 52(11–12), 743–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Enander, V. (2011). Violent women? The challenge of women’s violence in intimate heterosexual relationships to feminist analyses of partner violence. NORA-Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 19(2), 105–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Farley, M. (2006). Prostitution, trafficking, and cultural amnesia: What we must not know in order to keep the business of sexual exploitation running smoothly. Yale JL and Feminism, 18(2), 109–136.Google Scholar
  18. Farwell, N. (2004). War rape: New conceptualizations and responses. Affilia, 19(4), 389–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ferraro, K. J. (2013). Gender matters in intimate partner violence. In B. L. Russell (Ed.), Perceptions of female offenders (pp. 133–149). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Flinck, A., Åstedt-Kurki, P., & Paavilainen, E. (2008). Intimate partner violence as experienced by men. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 15(3), 322–327.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Frankland, A., & Brown, J. (2013). Coercive control in same-sex intimate partner violence. Journal of Family Violence, 29(1), 15–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gadd, D., Farrall, S., Dallimore, D., & Lombard, N. (2003). Male victims of domestic violence. Criminal Justice Matters, 53(1), 16–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goldenson, J., Spidel, A., Greaves, C., & Dutton, D. (2009). Female perpetrators of intimate partner violence: Within-group heterogeneity, related psychopathology, and a review of current treatment with recommendations for the future. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 18(7), 752–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gottzén, L & Korkmaz, S. (2013). Killars våld mot tjejer i nära relationer. (Boys’ violence against girls in intimate relationships.) In Unga och våld – en analys av maskulinitet och förebyggande verksamheter. (Youth and violence - an analysis of masculinity and prevention activities), (72–101). Stockholm: Nordstedts Law.Google Scholar
  25. Graham-Kevan, N., & Archer, J. (2003). Intimate terrorism and common couple violence: A test of Johnson’s predictions in four British samples. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18(11), 1247–1270.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hearn, J. (1998). The violences of men: how men talk about and how agencies respond to men’s violence to women. London: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hester, M. (2004). Future trends and developments. Violence Against Women, 10(12), 1431–1448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hester, M. (2012). Portrayal of women as intimate partner domestic violence perpetrators. Violence Against Women, 18(9), 1067–1082.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hester, M. (2013). Who does what to whom? Gender and domestic violence perpetrators in English police records. European Journal of Criminology, 10(5), 623–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hines, D. A., Brown, J., & Dunning, E. (2007). Characteristics of callers to the domestic abuse helpline for men. Journal of Family Violence, 22(2), 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Johnson, M. P. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57(2), 283–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Johnson, M. P. (2006). Conflict and control gender symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 12(4), 1003–1018.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Johnson, M. P. (2010). Langhinrichsen-rolling’s confirmation of the feminist analysis of intimate partner violence: Comment on "controversies involving gender and intimate partner violence in the United States". Sex Roles, 62(3–4), 212–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Johnson, M. P., & Ferraro, K. J. (2000). Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: Making distinctions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(4), 948–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Johnson, M. P., & Leone, J. M. (2005). The differential effects of intimate terrorism and situational couple violence findings from the national violence against women survey. Journal of Family Issues, 26(5), 322–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Johnson, M. P., Leone, J. M., & Xu, Y. (2014). Intimate terrorism and situational couple violence in general surveys: Ex-spouses required. Violence Against Women, 20(1), 186–207.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kelly, J. B., & Johnson, M. P. (2008). Differentiation among types of intimate partner violence: Research update and implications for interventions. Family Court Review, 46(3), 476–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kirkwood, C. (1993). Leaving abusive partners: From the scars of survival to the wisdom for change. London, Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. Kvale, S., Brinkmann, S., & Torhell, S.-E. (2009). Den kvalitativa forskningsintervjun. (The qualitative research interview; 2nd edition.). Studentlitteratur: Lund.Google Scholar
  40. Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (2010). Controversies involving gender and intimate partner violence in the United States. Sex Roles, 62(3), 179–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Leone, J. M., Johnson, M. P., & Cohan, C. L. (2007). Victim help seeking: Differences between intimate terrorism and situational couple violence. Family Relations, 56(5), 427–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McClennen, J. C. (2005). Domestic violence between same-gender partners recent findings and future research. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(2), 149–154.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McKinney, C. M., Caetano, R., Ramisetty-Mikler, S., & Nelson, S. (2009). Childhood family violence and perpetration and victimization of intimate partner violence: Findings from a national population-based study of couples. Annals of Epidemiology, 19(1), 25–32.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Messinger, A. M. (2011). Invisible victims: Same-sex IPV in the national violence against women survey. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(11), 2228–2243.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Migliaccio, T. A. (2001). Marginalizing the battered male. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 9(2), 205–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Migliaccio, T. A. (2002). Abused husbands a narrative analysis. Journal of Family Issues, 23(1), 26–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ödman, P. J. (2007). Tolkning, förståelse, vetande: hermeneutik i teori och praktik. (Interpretation, understanding, knowledge: hermeneutics in theory and practice; 2nd edition.). Stockholm: Norstedts Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  48. Osthoff, S. (2002). But, Gertrude, I beg to differ, a hit is not a hit is not a hit. Violence Against Women, 8(12), 1521–1544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pence, E., & Paymar, M. (1993). Education groups for men who batter: The Duluth model. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  50. Rosen, K. H., Stith, E. S. M., Few, A. L., Daly, K. L., & Tritt, D. R. (2005). A qualitative investigation of Johnson’s typology. Violence and Victims, 20(3), 319–334.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stark, E. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Stark, E. (2010). Do violent acts equal abuse? Resolving the gender parity/asymmetry dilemma. Sex Roles, 62(3), 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Straus, H., Cerulli, C., McNutt, L. A., Rhodes, K. V., Conner, K. R., Kemball, R. S., et al. (2009). Intimate partner violence and functional health status: Associations with severity, danger, and self-advocacy behaviors. Journal of Women’s Health, 18(5), 625–631.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Swan, S. C., & Snow, D. L. (2002). A typology of women’s use of violence in intimate relationships. Violence Against Women, 8(3), 286–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Swan, S. C., & Snow, D. L. (2006). The development of a theory of women’s use of violence in intimate relationships. Violence Against Women, 12(11), 1026–1045.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Swan, S. C., Gambone, L. J., Caldwell, J. E., Sullivan, T. P., & Snow, D. L. (2008). A review of research on women’s use of violence with male intimate partners. Violence and Victims, 23(3), 301–314.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tanha, M., Beck, C. J. A., Figueredo, A. J., & Raghavan, C. (2010). Sex differences in intimate partner violence and the use of coercive control as a motivational factor for intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(10), 1836–1854.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Williams, J. R., Ghandour, R. M., & Kub, J. E. (2008). Female perpetration of violence in heterosexual intimate relationships: Adolescence through adulthood. (2008). Trauma. Violence and Abuse, 9(4), 227–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. World Health Organization (2013). Responding to intimate partner violence and sexual violence against women: WHO clinical and policy guidelines (NLM classification: HV 6625). Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lotta Nybergh
    • 1
    • 3
    • 4
    Email author
  • Viveka Enander
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Gunilla Krantz
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Unit of Intervention and Implementation ResearchInstitute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
  2. 2.Department of Social Work, Faculty of Social SciencesUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
  3. 3.The Section for Epidemiology and Social MedicineInstitute of Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
  4. 4.The Västra Götaland Region Competence Centre on Intimate Partner ViolenceGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations