Advertisement

Journal of Family Violence

, Volume 29, Issue 8, pp 869–879 | Cite as

Intimate Partner Violence Against Married Women in Uganda

  • Emmanuelle G. Ogland
  • Xiaohe XuEmail author
  • John P. Bartkowski
  • Curtis P. Ogland
Research on Violence Against Women

Abstract

This study utilized data from the 2006 Uganda Demographic and Health Survey to examine correlates of the lifetime experience of intimate partner violence (IPV) against married women in Uganda. Guided by an integrated theoretical framework that synthesizes resource and gender theories, five hypotheses are developed and tested concerning three major forms of IPV: (a) physical violence, (b) emotional or psychological violence, and (c) sexual violence. Results from multivariate statistical analyses indicate that although both the resource and gender factors are significant predictors of the lifetime experience of IPV among married Ugandan women, the gender factors appear to be more systematic and robust than the resource factors in predicting IPV in Uganda. Theoretical and policy implications are discussed.

Keywords

Gender Physical violence Psychological violence Resource Sexual violence Violence against women 

References

  1. Anderson, K. L. (1997). Gender, status, and domestic violence: An integration of feminist and family violence approaches. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 655–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, K. L. (2005). Theorizing gender in intimate partner violence research. Sex Roles, 52, 853–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. (1979). Violence against wives. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  4. Ellis, A., Manuel, C., & Blackden, C. M. (2006). Gender and economic growth in Uganda: Unleashing the power of women. Washington: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  5. Felson, R. B., & Messner, S. F. (2000). The control motive in intimate partner violence. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 86–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fox, G. L., Benson, M. L., DeMaris, A. A., & Wyk, J. V. (2002). Economic distress and intimate violence: Testing family stress and resources theories. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 793–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Garcia-Moreno, C., Jansen, H. A. F. M., Ellsberg, M., Heise, L., & Watts, C. H. (2006). Prevalence of intimate partner violence: Findings from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence. Lancet, 368, 1260–1269.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gelles, R. J. (1974). The violent home: A study of physical aggression between husbands and wives. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Goode, W. J. (1971). Force and violence in the family. Journal of Marriage and Family, 33, 624–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hindin, M. J., & Adair, L. S. (2002). Who’s at risk? Factors associated with intimate partner violence in the Philippines. Social Science & Medicine, 55, 1385–1399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hoffman, K. L., Demo, D. H., & Edwards, J. N. (1994). Physical wife abuse in a non-Western society: An integrated theoretical approach. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 131–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jejeebhoy, S. J., & Cook, R. J. (1997). State accountability for wife-beating: The Indian challenge. Lancet, 349, S110–S112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jewkes, R. (2002). Intimate partner violence: Causes and prevention. Lancet, 359, 1423–1429.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jewkes, R., Levin, J., & Penn-Kekana, L. (2002). Risk factors for domestic violence: Findings from a South African cross-sectional study. Social Science & Medicine, 55, 1603–1617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnson, M. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57, 283–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnson, M. (2006). Domestic violence: It’s not about gender – or is it? Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1126–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnson, H., Ollus, N., & Nevala, S. (2008). Violence against women: An international perspective. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  18. Karamagi, C., Tumwine, K., Tylleskar, T., & Heggenhougen, K. (2006). Intimate partner violence against women in eastern Uganda: Implications for HIV prevention. BMC Public Health, 6, 284.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kishor, S., & Johnson, K. (2004). Profiling domestic violence: A multi-country study. Calverton: ORC Macro.Google Scholar
  20. Klomegah, R. (2008). Intimate partner violence in Zambia: An examination of risk factors and gender. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 39, 557–569.Google Scholar
  21. Koenig, M. A., Ahmed, S., Hossain, M. B., & Khorshed Alam Mozumder, A. B. (2003). Women’s status and domestic violence in rural Bangladesh: Individual and community-level effects. Demography, 40, 269–288.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Levinson, D. (1989). Family violence in cross-cultural perspective. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  23. MacMillan, R., & Gartner, R. (1999). When she brings home the bacon: Labor force participation and the risk of spousal violence against women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61, 947–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mann, J. R., & Takyi, B. K. (2009). Autonomy, dependence or culture: Examining the impact of resources and socio-cultural processes on attitudes towards intimate partner violence in Ghana, Africa. Journal of Family Violence, 24, 323–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Oyediran, K. A., & Isiugo-Abanihe, U. C. (2005). Perceptions of Nigerian women on domestic violence: Evidence from 2003 Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey. African Journal of Reproductive Health, 9, 38–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rodman, H. (1972). Marital power and the theory of resources in cultural context. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 3, 50–69.Google Scholar
  27. Shore, J. (2010). Human rights group challenges Uganda’s polygamy laws. The human rights brief. Center for Human Rights and Humanitarian Law. Retrieved from http://hrbrief.org/2010/04/human-rights-group-challenges-uganda’s-polygamy-laws/.
  28. Sugarman, D. B., & Frankel, S. L. (1996). Patriarchal ideology and wife-assault: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Family Violence, 11, 13–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Uganda Bureau of Statistics and Macro International Inc. (2007). Uganda demographic and health survey 2006. Calverton: UBOS and Macro International Inc.Google Scholar
  30. Uganda Population and Housing Census. 2002. Retrieved from http://www.ubos.org/onlinefiles/uploads/ubos/pdfdocuments/2002CensusFinalReportdoc.pdf.
  31. World Economic Forum. 2010. The global gender gap report 2010. Retrieved from http://www.weforum.org.
  32. World Health Organization. (2005). WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/gender/violence/who_multicountry_study/en/index.html.
  33. Xu, X. (1997). The prevalence and determination of wife abuse in urban China. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 3, 280–303.Google Scholar
  34. Xu, X., Kerley, K. R., & Sirisunyaluck, B. (2011). Understanding gender and domestic violence from a sample of married women in urban Thailand. Journal of Family Issues, 32, 791–819. doi: 10.1177/0192513X10386306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yount, K. M. (2005). Resources, family organization, and domestic violence against married women in Minya, Egypt. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 579–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yount, K. M., & Carrera, J. S. (2006). Domestic violence against married women in Cambodia. Social Forces, 85, 355–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© © Springer Science+Business Media New York (outside the USA) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emmanuelle G. Ogland
    • 1
  • Xiaohe Xu
    • 1
    Email author
  • John P. Bartkowski
    • 1
  • Curtis P. Ogland
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Sociology, One UTSA CircleUniversity of Texas at San AntonioSan AntonioUSA

Personalised recommendations