Journal of Family Violence

, Volume 28, Issue 5, pp 503–514 | Cite as

Temporary Restraining Orders in the Netherlands: A Qualitative Examination of Perpetrator and Victim Views

  • Floor B. van Rooij
  • Jose ten Haaf
  • Arnoud P. Verhoeff
INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH ON AGGRESSION AND VIOLENCE

Abstract

In 2009, the Netherlands introduced a 10-day temporary restraining order (TRO) intended for adult perpetrators of domestic violence to defuse dangerous situations and to reduce recidivism by combining a legal action with social services. For this study, 18 victims and 10 perpetrators were interviewed about their experiences with the TRO, related professional help, and the influence the TRO had had on their lives. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and subsequently qualitatively analyzed. Most of the victims were positive about the TRO period. Perpetrators were less positive. The vast majority of respondents accepted help during the TRO and were positive about the professionals’ attitudes, but not necessarily about the type of help. Most respondents reported an increase in their wellbeing, new insights, and no or less serious re-assaults by the perpetrator. The results suggest that, in the short term, TROs have a mainly positive effect on both victims and perpetrators.

Keywords

Restraining order Domestic violence IPV Qualitative Netherlands Experience Victim Perpetrator 

References

  1. Alhabib, S., Nur, U., & Jones, R. (2010). Domestic violence against women: Systematic review. Journal of Family Violence, 25, 369–382. doi:10.1007/s10896-009-9298-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldarondo, E., & Castro Fernandez, M. (2008). Intimate partner violence and recidivism following interventions with men who batter: Cultural and empirical considerations. In R. Carillo & J. Tello (Eds.), Family violence and men of color (pp. 1–36). New York: Springer publishing company.Google Scholar
  3. Apsler, R., Cummins, M. R., & Carl, S. (2003). Perceptions of the police by female victims of domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 9, 1318–1335. doi:10.1177/1077801203255554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Araujo, K., Guzmán, V., & Mauro, A. (2000). How domestic violence came to be viewed as a public issue and policy object. CEPAL Review, 70, 137–150. Retrieved from http://www.eclac.cl/publicaciones/xml/8/20008/lcg2095i_Araujo.pdf.Google Scholar
  5. Archer, J. (2002). Sex differences in physically aggressive acts between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 313–351. doi:10.1016/S1359-1789(01)00061-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Archer, J. (2006). Cross-cultural differences in physical aggression between partners: A social role analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1(2), 133–153. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1002_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ballif-Spanvill, B., Clayton, C. J., & Hendrix, S. B. (2007). Witness and nonwitness children’s violent and peaceful behavior in different types of simulated conflict with peers. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 77, 206–215. doi:10.1037/0002-9432.77.2.206.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Benitez, C. H. T., McNiel, D. E., & Binder, R. L. (2010). Do protection orders protect? The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 38, 376–385. Retrieved from: http://www.jaapl.org/content/38/3/376.full.pdf + html.Google Scholar
  9. Boeije, H. (2005). Analyseren in kwalitatief onderzoek: Denken en doen [Analyses in qualitative research: Thinking and doing]. Den Haag: Boom.Google Scholar
  10. Campbell, J. C. (2004). Helping women understand their risk in situations of intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19(12), 1464–1477. doi:10.1177/0886260504269698.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Campbell, J. C. (2005). Assessing dangerousness in domestic violence cases: History, challenges and opportunities. Criminology & Public Policy, 4(4), 653–672. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2005.00350.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chrisler, J. C., & Ferguson, S. (2006). Violence against women as a public health issue. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1087, 235–249. doi:10.1196/annals.1385.009.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Engle Merry, S. (2011). Gender violence: A cultural perspective. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. Garcia-Moreno, C., Heise, L., Jansen, H. A. F. M., Ellsberg, M., & Watts, C. H. (2005). Violence against women. Science, 310(5752), 1282–1283. doi:10.1126/science.1121400.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Garcia-Moreno, C., Jansen, H. A. F. M., Ellsberg, M., Heise, L., & Watts, C. H. (2006). Prevalence of intimate partner violence: Findings from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence. Lancet, 368(9543), 1260–1269. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.2.2.75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goodman, L., & Epstein, E. (2005). Refocusing on women: A new direction for policy and research on intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 479–487. doi:10.1177/0886260504267838.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gordon, R. (1983). An operational classification of disease prevention. Public Health Reports, 98, 107–109.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Haller, B. (2006). CAHR Country report Austria. Budapest: Paper presented at the Good practice in Tackling Violence against Women and Children. European Research & Practice Conference.Google Scholar
  19. Haller, B., Pelikan, C., & Smutney, P. (2004). The Austrian protection against domestic violence act 1996. In Council of Europe (Ed.), Crime policy in Europe. Good practices and promising examples (pp. 37–46). Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.Google Scholar
  20. Harvey, A., Garcia-Moreno, C., & Butchart, A. (2007). Primary prevention of intimate-partner violence and sexual violence: Background paper for WHO expert meeting May 23, 2007. Paper presented at the WHO expert meeting. Paper retrieved from http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/publications/violence/IPV-SV.pdf
  21. Hines, D. A., & Malley-Morrison, K. (2001). Psychological effects of partner abuse against men: A neglected area. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 2(2), 75–85. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.2.2.75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Holt, V. L., Kernic, M. A., Wolf, M. E., & Rivara, F. P. (2003). Do protection orders affect the likelihood of future partner violence and injury? American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 24(1), 16–21. doi:10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00576-7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Irwin, J., Waugh, F., & Wilkinson, M. (1999). Paper presented at the second Australasian women and policing conference. Queensland: Paper retrieved from http://www.aic.gov.au/events/aic%20upcoming%20events/1999/~/media/conferences/policewomen2/irwin2.pdf.Google Scholar
  24. Kanuha, V. K., & Ross, M. L. (2004). The use of temporary restraining orders (TRO’s) as a strategy to address intimate partner violence. Violence and Victims, 19, 343–356. doi:10.1891/vivi.19.3.343.65766.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kennair, N., & Mellor, D. (2007). Parent abuse: A review. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 38(3), 203–219. doi:10.1007/s10578-007-0061-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kernic, M. A., Wolf, M. E., Holt, V. L., McKnight, B., Huebner, C. E., & Rivara, F. P. (2003). Behavioral problems among children whose mothers are abused by an intimate partner. Child Abuse & Neglect, 27, 1231–1246. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2002.12.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Koninkrijk der Nederlanden (2008a). Wet van 9 oktober 2008, houdende regels strekkende tot het opleggen van een tijdelijk huisverbod aan personen van wie een ernstige dreiging van huiselijk geweld uitgaat (Wet tijdelijk huisverbod) [Law of 9th of October, rules concerning the issuing of a temporary restraining order to persons who seem to pose a serious threat of domestic violence]. Staatsblad 421 [state journal].Google Scholar
  28. Koninkrijk der Nederlanden (2008b). Besluit van 18 November 2008 tot vaststelling van het tijdstip van inwerkingtreding van de Wet tijdelijk huisverbod [Decree of 18th of November concerning the start date of the Law Temporary Restraining Order]. Staatsblad 484 [state journal].Google Scholar
  29. Kuppens, J., & Beke, B. (2008). Huisverbod, sleutel tot minder geweld?: aanzet tot een risicotaxatie-instrument huiselijk geweld [Restraining order, key to less violence?: Initial impetus to a risk assessment instrument domestic violence]. Amsterdam: SWP.Google Scholar
  30. Lindstrom, P. (2005). Violence against women in Scandinavia: A description and evaluation of two new laws aiming to protect women. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 5(2), 220–235. doi:10.1080/14043850410010720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Logan, T. K., Shannon, L., Walker, R., & Faragher, T. M. (2006). Protective orders: Questions and conundrums. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 7(3), 175–205. doi:10.1177/1524838006288930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Logar, R. (2005). The Austrian model of intervention in domestic violence cases. Paper presented at the expert group meeting “violence against women: Good practices in combating and eliminating violence against women”, division for the Advancement of Women. Paper retrieved from http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/egm/vaw-gp-2005/docs/experts/logar.dv.pdf
  33. Lünnemann, K. D., Tak, P. J. P., & Piechocki, D. J. G. (2002). Interventie door uithuisplaatsing: de juridische mogelijkheden van uithuisplaatsing van plegers van huiselijk geweld in Oostenrijk en Duitsland [intervention by eviction: The legal arrangement of eviction in cases of domestic violence in Austria and Germany]. Utrecht: Verwey-Jonker Instituut.Google Scholar
  34. Micucci, J. A. (1995). Adolescents who assault their parents: A family systems approach to treatment. Psychotherapy Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 32(1), 154–161. doi:10.1037/0033-3204.32.1.154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ministerie van Justitie. (2002). Privé geweld - publieke zaak: een nota voor de gezamenlijke aanpak van huiselijk geweld [Private violence- Public matter: A note for a joint approach to handle domestic violence]. Den Haag: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
  36. Ministerie van Justitie. (2009). Huiselijk geweld [Domestic violence]. Den Haag: Ministerie van Justitie.Google Scholar
  37. Oosterlee, A., Vink, R. M., & Smit, F. (2009). Prevalence of family violence in adults and children: Estimates using the capture-recapture method. European Journal of Public Health, 19(6), 586–591. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckp065.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Petersen, R., Moracco, K. E., Goldstein, K. E., & Andersen Clark, K. (2005). Moving beyond disclosure: Women’s perspectives on barriers and motivators to seeking assistance for intimate partner violence. Women & Health, 40(3), 63–76. doi:10.1300/J013v40n03_05.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Randle, A. A., & Graham, C. A. (2011). A review of the evidence on the effects of intimate partner violence on men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 12(2), 97–111. doi:10.1037/a0021944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rodriguez, M., Valentine, J. M., Son, J. B., & Muhammad, M. (2009). Intimate partner violence and barriers to mental health care for ethnically diverse populations of women. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 10, 358–374. doi:10.1177/1524838009339756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sandelowski, M. (2001). Real qualitative researchers do not count: The use of numbers in qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health, 24(3), 230–240. doi:10.1002/nur.1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stith, S. M., Rosen, K. H., Middleton, K. A., Busch, A. L., Lundeberg, K., & Carlton, R. P. (2000). The Intergenerational transmission of spouse abuse: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 640–654. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00640.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Strand, S. (2012). Using a restraining order as a protective risk management strategy to prevent intimate partner violence. Police Practice and Research, 13(3), 254–266. doi:10.1080/15614263.2011.607649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Van Dijk, T., Flight, S., Oppenhuis, E., & Duesmann, B. (1998). Domestic violence: A national study of the nature, size and effects of domestic violence in the Netherlands. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 6(1), 7–35. doi:10.1023/A:1008661910442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Van Rooij, F. B., ten Haaf, J., Segeren, M., & Krol, A. (2010). Het tijdelijk huisverbod in Amsterdam: een onderzoek naar kenmerken, toeleiding naar zorg en ervaringen van zowel betrokkenen als professionals in 2009 [The temporary restraining order in Amsterdam: A study into characteristics, guidance to care and experiences of involved people and professionals]. Amsterdam: Public Health Service.Google Scholar
  46. Van Rooij, F. B., Van Balen, F., & Hermanns, J. M. A. (2009). The experiences of involuntarily childless Turkish immigrants in the Netherlands. Qualitative Health Research, 19(5), 621–632. doi:10.1177/1049732309333242.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Verbi Software, 2007.Google Scholar
  48. Watkins, P. (2005). Police perspective: Discovering hidden truths in domestic violence interventions. Journal of Family Violence, 20(1), 47–54. doi:10.1007/s10896-005-1509-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wisner, C. L., Gilmer, T. P., Saltzman, L. E., & Zink, T. M. (1999). Intimate partner violence against women; do victims costs health plans more? The Journal of Family Practice, 48(6), 439–444.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Floor B. van Rooij
    • 1
  • Jose ten Haaf
    • 2
  • Arnoud P. Verhoeff
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of Social and Behavioral SciencesUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
  2. 2.Mental Health PreventionGGZ CentraalLelystadthe Netherlands
  3. 3.The Public Health Service AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations