Advertisement

Journal of Family Violence

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 257–273 | Cite as

Factors Predicting Relationship Satisfaction, Investment, and Commitment When Women Report High Prevalence of Psychological Abuse

  • Diane R. FollingstadEmail author
  • M. Jill Rogers
  • Jamieson L. Duvall
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Relationship satisfaction, investment, and commitment in women experiencing extensive psychological abuse were examined to determine predictive factors. Participants were the top quartile of a national sample of women in conflictual relationships (N = 81) experiencing psychological maltreatment. Relationship satisfaction, investment, and commitment were each used as criterion variables with conceptually related factors as the predictors (e.g., reactions to the psychological abuse; mental health indicators; personality variables; perceived harm; problematic relationship schemas; response styles; demographics). These relationship markers were differentially predicted within this group of women. Three independent clusters of women, based on patterns of satisfaction, investment, and commitment scores, were compared regarding physical abuse, reactions to psychological abuse, ratings of perceived harm, endorsement of relationship schemas, psychological distress variables, and personality variables. The cluster of women reporting higher satisfaction, investment, and commitment in these seemingly aversive relationships frequently demonstrated differences from the other two clusters. Implications for clinical applications are discussed.

Keywords

Psychological abuse Relationship satisfaction Predictors of relationship markers Severe psychological maltreatment 

References

  1. Anderson, D. K., & Saunders, D. G. (2003). Leaving an abusive partner: an empirical review of predictors, the process of leaving, and psychological well-being. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 4(2), 163–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bauserman, S. A., & Arias, I. (1992). Relationships among marital investment, marital satisfaction, and marital commitment in domestically victimized and nonvictimized wives. Violence and Victims, 7(4), 287–296.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ben-Ari, A., Winstok, Z., & Eisikovits, Z. (2003). Choice within entrapment and entrapment within choice: the challenge facing battered women who stay. Families in Society, 84(4), 539–546.Google Scholar
  4. Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  5. Carver, C. S. (1997). You want to measure coping but your protocol’s too long: consider the Brief COPE. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4(1), 92–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Connor-Smith, J. K., & Flachsbart, C. (2007). Relations between personality and coping: a meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(6), 1080–1107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston: Row, Peterson.Google Scholar
  8. Follingstad, D. R. (2009). Psychological aggression and women’s mental health: the status of the field. Trauma, Violence & Abuse: A Review Journal, 10(3), 271–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Follingstad, D. R. (2011). A measure of severe psychological abuse normed on a nationally representative sample. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(6), 1194–1214.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Follingstad, D. R., & Edmundson, M. (2010). Is psychological abuse reciprocal in intimate relationships? Data from a national sample of American adults. Journal of Family Violence, 25(5), 495–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Frye, N. E. (2006). Relationship problems and physical aggression: the moderating role of temporal comparison. Personal Relationships, 13(3), 303–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Heyman, R. E., Sayers, S. L., & Bellack, A. S. (1994). Global marital satisfaction versus marital adjustment: an empirical comparison of three measures. Journal of Family Psychology, 8(4), 432–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jones, W. H., Adams, J. M., Monroe, P. R., & Berry, J. O. (1995). A psychometric exploration of marital satisfaction and commitment. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 10(4), 923–932.Google Scholar
  14. Jordan, C. E., Campbell, R., & Follingstad, D. R. (2010). Violence against women: Physical, sexual, and psychological aggression. In S. Nolen-Hoeksema, T. D. Cannon, & T. A. Widiger (Eds.), Annual review of clinical psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 607–628). Palo Alto: Annual Reviews, Inc.Google Scholar
  15. Kim, J., & Gray, K. A. (2008). Leave or stay?: Battered women’s decision after intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(10), 1465–1482.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001). The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16(9), 606–613.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lerner, C. F., & Kennedy, L. T. (2000). Stay–leave decision making in battered women: trauma, coping and self-efficacy. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 24(2), 215–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Morey, L. C. (1991). Personality Assessment Inventory: Professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  19. Mullins-Sweatt, S. N., Jamerson, J. E., Samuel, D. B., Olson, D. R., & Widiger, T. A. (2006). Psychometric properties of an abbreviated instrument of the Five-Factor Model. Assessment, 13(2), 119–137.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Norton, R. (1983). Measuring marital quality: a critical look at the dependent variable. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 45(1), 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Noyes, R., Langbehn, D. R., Happel, R. L., Sieren, L. R., & Muller, B. A. (1999). Psychosomatics. Journal of Consultation Liaison Psychiatry, 40(6), 470–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Paulhus, D. L. (1988). Assessing self deception and impression management in self-reports: The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding. Vancouver: University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
  23. Peled, E., Eisikovits, Z., Enosh, G., & Winstok, Z. (2000). Choice and empowerment for battered women who stay: toward a constructivist model. Social Work, 45(1), 9–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rhatigan, D. L., & Axsom, D. K. (2006). Using the investment model to understand battered women’s commitment to abusive relationships. Journal of Family Violence, 21(2), 153–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rhodes, N. R., & McKenzie, E. B. (1998). Why do battered women stay?: Three decades of research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 3(4), 391–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Robins, C. J., Ladd, J., Welkowitz, J., Blaney, P. H., Diaz, R., & Kutcher, G. (1994). The Personal Style Inventory: preliminary validation studies of new measures of sociotropy and autonomy. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 16(4), 277–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rusbult, C. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: a test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16(2), 172–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rusbult, C. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: the development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(1), 101–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rusbult, C. E., & Martz, J. M. (1995). Remaining in an abusive relationship: an investment model analysis of nonvoluntary dependence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(6), 558–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The Investment Model Scale: measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5(4), 357–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sibley, C. G., Fischer, R., & Liu, J. H. (2005). Reliability and validity of the Revised Experiences in Close Relationships self-report measure of adult romantic attachment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(11), 1524–1536.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Smith, P. H., Tessaro, I., & Earp, J. A. (1995). Women’s experiences with battering: a conceptualization from qualitative research. Women’s Health Issues, 5(4), 173–182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Star, B. (1978). Comparing battered and non-battered women. Victimology, 3(1–2), 32–44.Google Scholar
  34. Strube, M. J. (1986). An analysis of the self-handicapping scale. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 7(3), 211–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ullman, S. E. (2000). Psychometric characteristics of the Social Reactions Questionnaire: a measure of reactions to sexual assault victims. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24(3), 257–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Warren, J., & Lanning, W. (1992). Sex role beliefs, control, and social isolation of battered women. Journal of Family Violence, 7(1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Young, J. E., Klosko, J. S., & Weishaar, M. E. (2003). Schema therapy: A practitioner’s guide. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diane R. Follingstad
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. Jill Rogers
    • 2
  • Jamieson L. Duvall
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Psychiatry, Medical CollegeUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Educational, School and Counseling Psychology, College of EducationUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA
  3. 3.Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, Department of Behavioral ScienceUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations