Journal of Family Violence

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 245–254

Online Obsessive Relational Intrusion: Further Concerns About Facebook

Original Article


Use of online social networking sites such as Facebook has burgeoned in the last 5 years. We examine these sites as facilitators of Online Obsessive Relational Intrusion (o-ORI)—a much-talked about, but relatively un-researched online phenomenon. We draw parallels between the types of behaviors conducted online and those identified in the literature on relational intrusion and its more extreme relative, stalking. We present a frequency analysis of students’ behavior on Facebook and find evidence of relational intrusion from both offenders and targets. The behaviors can be classified into five different categories, including: primary contact attempts, secondary contact attempts (i.e., contacting others connected to the target), monitoring or surveillance, expressions, and invitations. We conclude that Facebook facilitates behaviors that are indicative of obsessive relational intrusion and that such behaviors have implications for users’ privacy and security.


Online relational intrusion Stalking Privacy Social networking 


  1. Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), Article 11.Google Scholar
  2. Caven, R. (2007). Face world: From talk to stalk. The Sunday Telegraph.Google Scholar
  3. Dutton, L. B., & Winstead, B. A. (2006). Predicting unwanted pursuit: attachment, relationship satisfaction, relationship alternatives, and break-up distress. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23(4), 565–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of facebook “Friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), Article 1.Google Scholar
  5. George, A. (2006). Things you wouldn’t tell your mother. New Scientist, 191(2569), 50–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Govani, T., & Pashley, H. (2005). Student awareness of the privacy implications when using facebook. Unpublished Works.Google Scholar
  7. Hargittal, E. (2008). Whose apace? Differences among users and non-users of social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 276–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Harkin, J. (2007). Here’s looking at us. If you’re been making friends with total strangers or stalking an old flame, the chances are you’ve been spending time on Facebook. James Harkin has been, too. Financial Times, p. 22.Google Scholar
  9. Haugaard, J. J., & Seri, L. G. (2004). Stalking and other forms of intrusive contact among adolescents and young adults from the perspective of the person initiating the intrusive contact. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31(1), 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lampe, C., Ellison, N., & Steinfield, C. (2006). A face(book) in the crowd: Social searching vs. social browsing. Paper presented at the CSCW, Banff, Alberta, Canada.Google Scholar
  11. Meloy, J. R. (2007). Stalking: the state of the science. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 17, 1–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nadkarni, R., & Grubin, D. (2000). Stalking: why do people do it? BMJ, 320, 1486–1487.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ravensberg, V., & Miller, C. (2003). Stalking among young adults a review of the preliminary research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 8, 455–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sarno, D. (2007). You’re in site; MySpcae, Facebook allow us to snoop on friends and strangers. Seattle Times.Google Scholar
  15. Sheridan, L., & Davies, G. M. (2001). Stalking: the elusive crime. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 6, 133–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sinclair, H. C., & Frieze, I. H. (2005). When courtship persistence becomes intrusive pursuit: comparing rejector and prusuer perspectives of unrequited attraction. Sex Roles, 52(11/12), 839–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Skiba, D. J. (2007). Poke me. Where’s your face in space? Nursing Education Perspectives, pp. 214–216.Google Scholar
  18. Sng, S. (2007). Psst... I’m a facestalker. Are you? Straits Times.Google Scholar
  19. Spitzberg, B. H., & Cupach, W. R. (2003). What mad pursuit? Obsessive relational intrusion and stalking related phenomena. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 8, 345–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Spitzberg, B. H., & Cupach, W. R. (2006). The state of the art of stalking: taking stock of the emerging literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 64–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Spitzberg, B. H., & Hoobler, G. (2002). Cyberstalking and the technologies of interpersonal terrorism. New Media & Society, 4(1), 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Spitzberg, B. H., & Rhea, J. (1999). Obsessive relational intrusion and sexual coercion victimization. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(1), 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tong, S. T., Van Der Heide, B., Langwell, L., & Walther, J. B. (2008). Too much of a good thing? The relationship between number of friends and interpersonal impressions on facebook. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(3), 531–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Young, H. (2007). Facebook Facts. The Capitol Times & Winsconsin State Journal Retrieved January 15, 2008, 2008Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Memorial University of NewfoundlandSt. John’sCanada

Personalised recommendations