Journal of Family Violence

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 393–400 | Cite as

Gender Differences in the Nature of the Intimate Partner Violence and Effects of Perpetrator Arrest on Revictimization

Original Article

Abstract

The majority of research on intimate partner violence (IPV) has addressed male-to-female violence, although a small but growing body of literature has developed that explores males victimized by female partners. This study used data from the National Crime Victimization Survey from 1987 to 2003 to examine male victimization by comparing the nature of violence to female victimization and by exploring the effect of perpetrator arrest on preventing revictimization. The sample was comprised of 2,462 female and 298 male victims. Study variables included gender, arrest, revictimization, type of violence, injury, and use of a weapon. Results showed that men were victimized by IPV less frequently than women and received fewer injuries, although they were more likely to experience more severe violence. Police arrested female perpetrators, but generally only if injury was involved; however, arrest did not reduce male victims’ chance of revictimization.

Keywords

Intimate partner violence Police Arrest Revictimization Gender differences 

References

  1. Archer, C., DuPree, C., Miller, N., Spence, D., & Uekert, B. (2003). National evaluation of the grants to encourage arrest policies program. Revised final report. Washington: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  2. Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: a meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651–680.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumer, E. P., Felson, R. B., & Messner, S. F. (2003). Changes in police notification for rape, 1973–2000. Criminology, 41(3), 841–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blackwell, B. S. (2000). Perceived sanction threats, gender, and crime: a test and elaboration of power-control theory. Criminology, 38, 439–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Busch, A. L., & Rosenberg, M. S. (2004). Comparing women and men arrested for domestic violence: a preliminary report. Journal of Family Violence, 19(1), 49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cascardi, M., & Vivian, D. (1995). Context for specific episodes of marital violence: gender and severity of violence differences. Journal of Family Violence, 10(3), 265–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Catalano, S. (2008). Intimate partner violence in the United States. Retrieved February 15, 2008, from http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/intimate/ipv.htm.
  8. Cattaneo, L. B., & Goodman, L. A. (2005). Risk factors for reabuse in intimate partner violence: a cross-disciplinary critical review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 6(2), 141–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cho, H. (2007). Effects of arrest of domestic violence batterers on reducing victims’ revictimization: An analysis of the national crime victimization survey from 1987 to 2003. Paper presented at the 11th Society for Social Work and Research Annual Conference.Google Scholar
  10. Davis, T. E. (2004). The effects of domestic violence on male victims in the United States Marine Corps. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 64(7-B), 3579.Google Scholar
  11. Dobash, R. P., & Dobash, R. E. (2004). Women’s violence to men in intimate relationships: working on a puzzle. The British Journal of Criminology, 44(3), 324–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1986). Gender and aggressive behavior: a meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100(3), 309–330.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Felson, R. B., Ackerman, J. M., & Gallagher, C. (2005). Police intervention and the repeat of domestic assault. Washington: US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  14. Ford, D. A. (2003). Coercing victim participation in domestic violence prosecutions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18(6), 669–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gibbs, J. P. (1986). Deterrence theory and research. In G. B. Melton (Ed.), The law as a behavioral instrument: Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 1985. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  16. Greenblat, C. S. (1983). A hit is a hit is a hit ... or is it? Approval and tolerance of the use of physical force by spouses. In D. Finkelhor, R. J. Gelles, G. T. Hotaling, & M. A. Straus (Eds.), The dark side of families (pp. 235–260). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Greenfeld, L., Rand, M., Craven, D., Klaus, P., Perkins, C., Ringel, C., et al. (1998). Violence by intimates: Analysis of data on crimes by current or former spouses, boyfriends and girlfriends. Washington: US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  18. Griffin, R. M. (2001, May 25, 2001). Breaking the silence: Sociologist studies woman-to-woman sexual violence. Retrieved June 3, 2005, from http://www.gayhealth.com/templates/1117829363937302884179/common/feature.html?record=58.
  19. Hamberger, L. K., & Guse, C. E. (2002). Men’s and women’s use of intimate partner violence in clinical samples. Violence Against Women, 8, 1301–1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Henning, K., & Feder, L. (2004). A comparison of men and women arrested for domestic violence: who presents the greater threat? Journal of Family Violence, 19(2), 69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hirschel, J. D., & Hutchison, I. W. (1992). Female spouse abuse and the police response: the Charlotte, North Carolina experiment. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 83, 73–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hotaling, G. T., & Buzawa, E. S. (2001). An analysis of assaults in rural communities: Final report. Washington: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.Google Scholar
  23. Isaac, N. (1994). Men who batter, profile from a restraining order database. Archives of Family Medicine, 3, 50–54.Google Scholar
  24. Johnson, M. P., & Ferraro, K. J. (2000). Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: making distinctions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 948–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jones, D. A., & Belknap, J. (1999). Police response to battering in a progressive pro-arrest jurisdictin. Justice Quarterly, 16, 249–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kane, R. (1999). Patterns of arrest in domestic violence encounters: identifying a police decision-making model. Journal of Criminal Justice, 27, 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kane, R. J. (2000). Police responses to restraining orders in domestic violence incidents: identifying the custody-threshold thesis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 561–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Langan, P. A., & Innes, C. A. (1986). Preventing domestic violence against women (No. NCJ-102037). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
  29. Martin, M. (1997). Double your trouble: dual arrest in family violence. Journal of Family Violence, 12, 139–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maxwell, C., Garner, J., & Fagan, J. (2001). The effects of arrest on intimate partner violence: New evidence from the Spouse Assault Replication Program. Research in brief. Washington: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  31. Melton, H. C., & Belknap, J. (2003). He hits, she hits: assessing gender differences and similarities in officially reported intimate partner violence. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30(3), 328–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Menard, S. (1995). Applied logistic regression analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Miller, A. J., Bobner, R. F., & Zarski, J. J. (2000). Sexual identity development: a base for work with same-sex couple partner abuse. Contemporary Family Therapy, 22(2), 189–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Monahan, K., & O’Leary, K. D. (1999). Head injury and battered women: an initial inquiry. Health and Social Work, 24, 269–278.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Myers, R. (1990). Classical and modern regression with applications (2nd ed.). Boston: Duxbury.Google Scholar
  36. Rennison, C. M., & Welchans, S. (2000). Intimate partner violence (No. NCJ-178247). Washington: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  37. Robinson, A. L. (2000). The effect of a domestic violence policy change on police officers’ schemata. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 600–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Saunders, D. G. (1988). Wife abuse, husband abuse or mutual combat? A feminist perspective on the empirical findings. In K. Yllo & M. Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 90–113). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. Schumacher, J. A., Feldbau-Kohn, S., Slep, A. M. S., & Heyman, R. E. (2001). Risk factors for male-to-female partner physical abuse. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 6, 281–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sherman, L. W., & Berk, R. A. (1984). The specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic assault. American Sociological Review, 49, 261–272.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Simpson, S. S., Bouffard, L. A., Garner, J., & Hickman, L. (2006). The influence of legal reform on the probability of arrest in domestic violence cases. Justice Quarterly, 23(3), 297–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: the conflict tactics scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Straus, M. A. (1993). Physical assaults by wives: A major social problem. In R. J. Gelles & D. R. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 67–87). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  44. Straus, M. A., & Gelles, R. J. (1986). Societal change and change in family violence from 1975–1985 as revealed by two national surveys. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 465–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tibbets, S. G., & Herz, D. C. (1996). Gender differences in factors of social control and rational choice. Deviant Behavior, 17, 183–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence: Research report. Washington: National Institute of Justice and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Google Scholar
  47. Williams, K. R. (2005). Arrest and intimate partner violence: toward a more complete application of deterrence theory. Aggression and Violenct Behavior, 10(6), 660–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Social WorkMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  2. 2.College of Social WorkFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations