Advertisement

Journal of Family Violence

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 325–335 | Cite as

Development and Predictive Ability of a Behavior-Based Typology of Men Who Batter

  • Charlie Stoops
  • Larry Bennett
  • Neil Vincent
Original Article

Abstract

This study explores the existence and predictive ability of a behavior-based typology of men who were adjudicated for a domestic violence crime in an urban criminal justice system. Data from 671 men who completed a 2-hour biopsychosocial assessment were analyzed using cluster analysis. Findings indicate a typology of low level criminality (25.6%), dysphoric volatile behavior (42.2%), and dysphoric general violence (32.2%) similar to previous typologies, but with some unique characteristics. The behavior-based typology predicted both program completion and subsequent rearrest. This study provides preliminary support for the development of typological assessment in criminal justice and BIP settings for early identification of men who may need additional interventions.

Keywords

Typology Domestic violence Batterers Assessment 

References

  1. Aldenderfer, M. S., & Blashfield, R. K. (1984). Cluster analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, L., Stoops, C., Call, C., & Flett, H. (2007). Program completion and rearrest in a batterer intervention system. Research on Social Work Practice, 17(1), 42–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Briere, J., & Runtz, M. (1989). The Trauma Symptom Checklist (TSC-33): early data on a new scale. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 4, 151–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cavanaugh, M. M., & Gelles, R. J. (2005). The utility of male domestic violence offender typologies: New directions for research, policy, and practice. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(2), 155–166.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cloninger, C. R. (1987). Neurogenetic adaptive mechanisms in alcoholism. Science, 236, 410–416.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Delsol, C., Margolin, G., & John, R. S. (2003). A typology of martially violent men and correlates of violence in a community sample. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(3), 635–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dutton, D. G. (1998). The abusive personality: violence and control in intimate relationships. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  8. Dutton, D. G., & Kropp, P. R. (2000). A review of domestic violence risk assessments. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 1(2), 171–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dutton, D. G., van Ginkel, C., & Landolt, M. A. (1996). Jealousy, intimate abusiveness, and intrusiveness. Journal of Family Violence, 11(4), 411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gondolf, E.W. (1995). Discharge criteria for batterer programs. Unpublished paper, available at http://www.mincava.umn.edu/papers/gondolf/discharg.html.
  11. Gondolf, E. W. (1998). Who are these guys? Toward a typology of batterers. Violence and Victims, 3(3), 187–203.Google Scholar
  12. Gondolf, E. W. (2001a). Batterer intervention systems: issues, outcomes, and recommendations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Gondolf, E. W. (2001b). Batterer program participants who repeatedly re-assault: psychopathic tendencies and other disorders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 361–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hamberger, L. K., Lohr, J. M., Bonge, D., & Tolin, D. F. (1996). A large sample empirical typology of male spouse abusers and its relationship to dimensions of abuse. Violence and Victims, 11, 277–292.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Heckert, D. A., & Gondolf, E. W. (2004). Battered women’s perceptions of risk versus risk factors and instruments in predicting repeat re-assault. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19(7), 778–800.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Heckert, D. A., & Gondolf, E. W. (2000a). Assessing assault self-reports by batterer program participants and their partners. Journal of Family Violence, 15(2), 181–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heckert, D. A., & Gondolf, E. W. (2000b). Predictors of underreporting of male violence by batterer program participants and their partners. Journal of Family Violence, 15(4), 423–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Holtzworth-Munroe, A., & Stuart, G. (1994). Typologies of male batterers: three subtypes and the differences among them. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 476–497.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Holtzworth-Munroe, A., & Meehan, J. C. (2004). Typologies of men who are martially violent: scientific and clinical implications. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19(12), 1369–1789.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Meehan, J. C., Herron, K., Rehman, U., & Stuart, G. L. (2000). Testing the Holtzworth-Munroe and Stuart (1994) batterer typology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(6), 1000–1019.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones, A. S., & Gondolf, E. W. (2001). Time-varying risk factors for re-assault among batterer program participants. Journal of Family Violence, 16(4), 345–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., Huss, M. T., & Ramsey, S. (2000). The clinical utility of batterer typologies. Journal of Family Violence, 15, 37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lohr, J. M., Bonge, D., Witte, T. H., Hamberger, L. K., & Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (2005). Consistency and accuracy of batterer typology identification. Journal of Family Violence, 20(4), 253–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lowenkamp, C. T., & Latessa, E. J. (2005). Increasing the effectiveness of correctional programming through the risk principle: Identifying offenders for residential placement. Criminology and Public Policy, 4(2), 263–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mayfield, D., McLeod, G., & Hall, P. (1974). The CAGE questionnaire: validation of a new alcoholism screening instrument. American Journal of Psychiatry, 131, 1121–1123.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Megargee, E. I., Cook, P. E., & Mendelsohn, G. A. (1967). Development and validation of an MMPI scale of assaultiveness in overcontrolled individuals. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 72, 519–528.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Millon, T. (1983). Millon clinical multiaxial inventory manual. Minneapolis: Interpretive Scoring Systems.Google Scholar
  28. Murphy, C. M., Taft, C. T., & Eckhardt, C. I. (2007). Anger profiles among partner violent men: differences in clinical presentation and treatment outcome. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54(2), 189–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Oldham, J., Clarkin, J., Appelbaum, A., Carr, A., Kernberg, P., Lotterman, A., et al. (1985). A self-report instrument for Borderline Personality Organization. In T. H. McGlashan (Ed.), The borderline: current empirical research (pp. 1–18). Washington: American Psychiatric.Google Scholar
  30. O’Leary, K. D., & Arias, I. (1988). Assessing agreement of reports of spouse abuse. In G. Hotaling, D. Finkelhor, J. Kirkpatrick & M. Straus (Eds.), Family abuse and its consequences: new directions in research. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Pernanen, K. (1991). Alcohol in human violence. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  32. Saunders, D. G. (2004). The place of a typology of men who are “martially” violent within a nested ecological model: a response to Holtzworth-Munroe and Meehan. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19(12), 1390–1395.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Shedler, J., & Westen, D. (1998). Refining the measurement of Axis II: a Q-sort procedure for assessing personality pathology. Assessment, 5(4), 333–353.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Spielberger, C. D., Jacobs, G., Russell, S., & Crane, R. (1983). Assessment of anger: The state-trait anger scale. In J. N. Butcher & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 2, pp. 159–187). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  35. Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2): development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stoops, C. (2003). Testing of a behavior-based typology of men who batter within an urban criminal justice sample. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago, United States - Illinois. 2003. Dissertations & Theses: A&I.(Publication No. AAT 3083890).Google Scholar
  37. Tolman, R. M. (1989). The development of a measure of psychological maltreatment of women by their male partners. Violence and Victims, 4, 159–177.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Tolman, R.M. (2005). Instructions for scoring PMWI subscales. http://sitemaker.umich.edu/pmwi/instructions_for_scoring_pmwi_subscales. Accessed December 10, 2005.
  39. Tolman, R. M., & Bennett, L. W. (1990). A review of quantitative research on men who batter. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 5, 87–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Walker, L. (1995). Current perspective of men who batter women-Implications for intervention and treatment to stop violence against women: comments on Gottman, et al. (1995). Journal of Family Psychology, 9(3), 264–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wekerle, C., & Wall, A. (eds). (2002). The violence and addiction equation: theoretical and clinical issues in substance abuse and relationship violence. New York: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Westen, D., & Shedler, J. (1999). Revising and assessing axis II, Part II: toward an empirically based and clinically useful classification of personality disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156(2), 273–285.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. White, P. J., & Gondolf, E. W. (2000). Implications of personality profiles for batterer treatment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 467–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Social WorkDominican UniversityRiver ForestUSA
  2. 2.Jane Addams College of Social WorkUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA
  3. 3.Master of Social Work ProgramDePaul UniversityChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations