Journal of Family Violence

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 141–148 | Cite as

Developmental Pathways into Social and Sexual Deviance

  • John A. HunterEmail author
  • Aurelio Jose Figueredo
  • Neil M. Malamuth
Original Article


Path analysis was used to assess the contribution of four exogenous developmental variables (sexual abuse, physical abuse, exposure to violence, exposure to pornography—each occurring prior to age 13) and four personality constructs (“psychopathic and antagonistic attitudes,” “psychosocial deficits,” “pedophilia,” “hostile masculinity”) to the prediction of non-sexual delinquency and number of male child victims in a sample of 256 adolescent males with a history of “hands-on” sexual offending. “Psychosocial deficits” was found to partially mediate the effects of the exogenous variables on both outcomes. Exposure to violence both directly, and indirectly through “psychopathic and antagonistic attitudes,” contributed to the prediction of non-sexual delinquency. Sexual abuse by a male directly, and indirectly through “hostile masculinity” and “pedophila”, contributed to prediction of number of male child victims. Clinical implications of the findings are discussed.


Pathways Social deviance Sexual deviance Adolescents 


  1. Abbey, A., Parkhill, M. R., BeShears, R., Zawacki, T., & Clinton-Sherrod, A. M. (2006). Cross-sectional predictors of sexual assault perpetration in a community sample of single African American and Caucasian men. Aggressive Behavior, 32(1), 54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Achenbach, T. M., & Dumenci, L. (2001). Advances in empirically based assessment: Revised cross-informant syndromes and new DSM-oriented scales for the CBCL, YSR, and TRF: Comment on Lengua, Sadowski, Friedrich, and Fisher (2001). Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 69(4), 699–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexy, E. M., Burgess, A. W., & Prentky, R. A. (2009). Pornography use as a risk marker for an aggressive pattern of behavior among sexually reactive children and adolescents. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 14(6), 442–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression: A social learning analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 364–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beggs, S. M., & Grace, R. C. (2008). Psychopathy, intelligence, and recidivism in child molesters: Evidence of an interaction effect. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35(6), 683–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: experiments by nature and design. Cambridge: Harvard University.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, G. W., Craig, T. K., & Harris, T. O. (2008). Parental maltreatment and proximal risk factors using the Childhood Experience of Care & Abuse (CECA) instrument: A life-course study of chronic depression—5. Journal of Affective Disorders, 110(3), 222–233.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Brumbach, B. H., Figueredo, A. J., & Ellis, B. J. (2009). Effects of harsh and unpredictable environments in adolescence on development of life history strategies: A longitudinal test of an evolutionary model. Human Nature, 20, 25–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 38(2), 217–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Check, J. V. (1985). The Hostility Toward Women Scale. Dissertation Abstracts International, 45(12-B, Pt 1), 3993.Google Scholar
  12. Elliott, D. S., & Huizinga, D. (1983). Social class and delinquent behavior in a national youth panel. Criminology: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21(2), 149–177.Google Scholar
  13. Ellis, B. J., Figueredo, A. J., Brumbach, B. H., & Schlomer, G. L. (2009). Fundamental dimensions of environmental risk: The impact of harsh versus unpredictable environments on the evolution and development of life history strategies. Human Nature, 20, 204–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Figueredo, A. J., & Jacobs, W. J. (2009). Aggression, risk-taking, and alternative life history strategies: The behavioral ecology of social deviance. In M. Frias-Armenta & V. Corral-Verdugo (Eds.), Biopsychosocial Perspectives on Aggression, in press.Google Scholar
  15. Figueredo, A. J., McKnight, P. E., McKnight, K. M., & Sidani, S. (2000). Multivariate modeling of missing data within and across assessment waves. Addiction, 95(Supplement 3), S361–S380.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor Analysis. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  17. Hall, G. N., et al. (2005). Ethnicity, culture, and sexual aggression: risk and protective. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 830–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(6), 1154–1163.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hunter, J. A., Goodwin, D. W., & Becker, J. V. (1994). The relationship between phallometrically measured deviant sexual arousal and clinical characteristics in juvenile sexual offenders. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32(5), 533–538.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hunter, J. A., Figueredo, A. J., Malamuth, N. M., & Becker, J. V. (2004). Developmental pathways in youth sexual aggression and delinquency: risk factors and mediators. Journal of Family Violence, 19(4), 233–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jackson, D. N. (1987). Personality research form-form E. Port Huron: Research Psychologists.Google Scholar
  22. Jacques-Tiura, A., Abbey, A., Pakhill, M., & Zawacki, T. (2007). Why do some men misperceive women's sexual intentions more frequently than others do? An application of the confluence model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1467–1480.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kingston, D. A., Firestone, P., Wexler, A., & Bradford, J. M. (2008). Factors associated with recidivism among intrafamilial child molesters. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 14(1), 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Levenson, M. R., Kiehl, K. A., & Fitzpatrick, C. M. (1995). Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalized population. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 68(1), 151–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lim, S., & Howard, R. (1998). Antecedents of sexual and non-sexual aggression in young Singaporean men. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 1163–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Malamuth, N. M. (1989). The attraction to sexual aggression scale: I. Journal of Sex Research, 26(1), 26–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Malamuth, N. M. (1996). The confluence model of sexual aggression: Feminist and evolutionary perspectives. In D. M. Buss & N. M. Malamuth (Eds.), Sex, power, conflict: Evolutionary and feminist perspectives (pp. 269–295). New York: Oxford University.Google Scholar
  28. Malamuth, N. M. (1998). The confluence model as an organizing framework for research on sexually aggressive men: Risk moderators, imagined aggression, and pornography consumption. In R. G. Geen & E. Donnerstein (Eds.), Human aggression: Theories, research, and implications for social policy (pp. 229–245). San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  29. Malamuth, N. (2003). Criminal and non-criminal sexual aggressors: Integrating psychopathy in a hierarchical-mediational confluence model. In R. A. Prentky, E. Janus & M. Seto (Eds.), Understanding and Managing Sexually Coercive Behavior. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 989 (pp. 33–58). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  30. Malamuth, N. M., Heavey, C. L., & Linz, D. (1993). Predicting men’s antisocial behavior against women: The interaction model of sexual aggression. In G. C. N. Hall, R. Hirschman et. al. (Eds.), Sexual aggression: Issues in etiology, assessment, and treatment (Vol. xix, pp. 238). Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  31. Malamuth, N. M., Linz, D., Heavey, C. L., Barnes, G., et al. (1995). Using the confluence model of sexual aggression to predict men’s conflict with women: A 10-year follow-up study. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 69(2), 353–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Martin, S. R., et al. (2005). The involvement in sexual coercive behaviors of Spanish college men. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(7), 872–891.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Nelson, P. A. (1979). Personality, sexual functions, and sexual behavior: an experiment in methodology. Dissertation Abstracts International, 39(12B), 6134.Google Scholar
  34. Rowe, D. C., Vazsonyi, A. T., & Figueredo, A. J. (1997). Mating-effort in adolescence: a conditional or alternative strategy. Personality and Individual Differences, 23(1), 105–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Holahan, C. K. (1979). Negative and positive components of psychological masculinity and femininity and their relationships to self-reports of neurotic and acting out behaviors. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 37(10), 1673–1682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Waite, D., Keller, A., McGarvey, E., Wieckowski, E., Pinkerton, R., & Brown, G. L. (2005). Juvenile sex offender re-arrest rates for sexual, violent nonsexual and property crimes: A 10-year follow-up. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 17(3), 313–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • John A. Hunter
    • 1
    • 4
    Email author
  • Aurelio Jose Figueredo
    • 2
  • Neil M. Malamuth
    • 3
  1. 1.University of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA
  2. 2.University of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  3. 3.University of California-Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA
  4. 4. New Orleans70115

Personalised recommendations