Journal of Family Violence

, 25:81 | Cite as

The Interrelationship Between Substance Abuse and the Likelihood of Arrest, Conviction, and Re-offending in Cases of Intimate Partner Violence

Original Article

Abstract

The nexus between substance abuse and intimate partner violence has been studied in depth. The interrelationship between substance abuse, intimate partner violence, and the criminal justice system response and subsequent offending has not received as much attention. In this article, the authors examine the impact of substance abuse on the likelihood of an officer’s decision to make an arrest, conviction in that case, and subsequent re-offending. The authors find that while official decision-making remains unaffected by the fact that the offender has been drinking and/or using drugs, substance abuse and subsequent re-offending are inextricably interlinked. These findings highlight the need to screen domestic violence offenders for alcohol/drug abuse, and provide offenders manifesting these problems with alcohol/drug treatment in addition to batterer treatment.

Keywords

Arrest Alcohol Conviction Intimate partner violence Re-offending 

References

  1. Bachman, R., & Croker, A. L. (1995). Police involvement in domestic violence: the interactive effects of victim injury, offenders’ history of violence, and race. Violence and Victims, 10, 91–106.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Baird, A. C., & Clayton, O. (2002). Domestic violence and discretionary police action in urban areas: Exploring data patterns using correspondence analysis. Paper presented at the Southern Sociological Society.Google Scholar
  3. Berk, R., & Newton, P. (1985). Does arrest really deter wife batter? An effort to replicate the findings of the Minneapolis spouse abuse experiment. American Sociological Review, 50, 253–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berk, R., & Sherman, L. (1988). Police responses to family violence incidences: an analysis of an experimental design with incomplete randomization. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 70–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berk, S. F., & Loseke, D. R. (1980). “Handling” family violence: Situational determinants of police arrest in domestic disturbances. Law & Society Review, 15(2), 317–346. 81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Black, D. (1980). The manners and customs of the police. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  7. Brookoff, D., O’Brien, K. K., Cook, C. S., Thompson, T. I., & Williams, C. (1997). Characteristics of participants in domestic violence. Journal of the American Medical Association, 277, 1369–1373.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Buzawa, E., & Austin, T. (1993). Determining police response to domestic violence victims. American Behavioral Scientist, 36, 610–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buzawa, E., & Hotaling, G. (2000). The police response to domestic violence calls for assistance in three Massachusetts towns: Final report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
  10. Cattaneo, L., & Goodman, L. (2003). Victim-reported risk factors for continued abusive behavior: assessing the dangerousness of arrested batterers. Journal of Community Psychology, 31(4), 349–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cattaneo, L. B., & Goodman, L. A. (2005). Risk factors for reabuse in intimate partner violence: a cross-disciplinary critical review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 6(2), 141–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chovanec, M. G. (1995). Attrition in the treatment of men who batter: closer look at men’s decision-making process about attending or dropping out of treatment. Dissertation Abstracts International. A: The Humanities and Social Sciences, 56(6), 2414.Google Scholar
  13. Daly, J. E., & Pelowski, S. (2000). Predictors of dropout among men who batter: a review of studies with implications for research and practice. Violence and Victims, 15(2), 137–160.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Daly, J. E., Power, T. G., & Gondolf, E. W. (2001). Predictors of batterer program attendance. Journal of interpersonal violence, 16(10), 971–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DeMaris, A., & Jackson, J. K. (1987). Batterers’ reports of recidivism after counseling. Social Casework, 68, 458–465.Google Scholar
  16. Dutton, D. G., Bodnarchuk, M., Kropp, R., Hart, S. D., & Ogloff, J. R. P. (1997). Wife assault treatment and criminal recidivism: a 1-year follow-up. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 41(1), 9–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eigenberg, H. (ed). (2001). Women Battering in the United States: Till Death Do Us Part. Prospect Heights: Waveland.Google Scholar
  18. Eigenberg, H. M., Scarborough, K. E., & Kappeler, V. E. (1996). Contributory factors affecting arrest in domestic and non-domestic assaults. American Journal of Police, 15, 27–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eitle, D. (2005). The influence of mandatory arrest policies, police organizational characteristics, and situational variables on the probability of arrest in domestic violence cases. Crime and Delinquency, 51, 573–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fals-Stewart, W. (2003). The occurrence of partner physical aggression on days of alcohol consumption: a longitudinal diary study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71(1), 41–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Feder, L. (1996). The importance of offender’s presence in the arrest decision when police respond to domestic violence calls. Journal of Criminal Justice, 12, 279–305.Google Scholar
  22. Feder, L. (1998). Police handling of domestic violence calls: is there a case for discrimination? Crime & Delinquency, 44(2), 139–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Garner, J., Fagan, J., & Maxwell, C. (1995). Published findings from the spouse assault replication program: a critical review. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 11, 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Greenfeld, L. A., Rand, M. R., Craven, D., Klaus, P. A., Perkins, C. A., Ringel, C., et al. (1998). Violence by intimates: Analysis of data on crimes by current or former spouses, boyfriends, and girlfriends. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
  25. Hartman, J., & Belknap, J. (2003). Beyond the gatekeepers: court professionals’ self reported attitudes about and experiences with misdemeanor domestic violence cases. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30(3), 349–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hilton, N. Z., & Harris, G. T. (2005). Predicting wife assault: a critical review and implications for police and practice. Trauma, Violence and Abuse, 6(1), 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hirschel, D., Buzawa, E., Pattavina, A., & Faggiani, D. (2007). Domestic violence and mandatory arrest laws: to what extent do they influence police arrest decisions? Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 98(1), 255–298.Google Scholar
  28. Houry, D., Parrmore, C., Fayard, G., Thorn, J., Heron, S., & Kellerman, A. (2004). Characteristics of household addresses that repeatedly contact 911 to report intimate partner violence. Academic Emergency Medicine, 11, 662–667.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hutchison, I. (2003). Substance use and abused women’s utilization of the police. Journal of Family Violence, 18(2), 93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hutchison, I. W., & Hirschel, J. D. (1998). Abused women: help-seeking strategies and police utilization. Violence Against Women, 4, 436–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Johnson, I. M. (1990). A loglinear analysis of wives’ decisions to call the police in domestic-violence disputes. Journal of Criminal Justice, 18, 147–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jones, A. S., & Gondolf, E. W. (2001). Time-varying risk factors for reassault among batter program participants. Journal of Family Violence, 16(4), 345–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jones, D. A. & Belknap, J. (1996). Police responses to battering in a pro-arrest jurisdiction. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Society of Criminology, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
  34. Jones, D. A., & Belknap, J. (1999). Police responses to battering in a progressive pro-arrest jurisdiction. Justice Quarterly, 15, 249–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kantor, G. K., & Straus, M. A. (1990). Response of victims and the police to assaults on wives. In M. A. Straus & R. A. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families. New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
  36. Kingsnorth, R. (2006). Intimate partner violence: predictors of recidivism in a sample of arrestees. Violence Against Women, 12(10), 917–935.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Klinger, D. A. (1995). Policing spouse assault. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32, 308–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Langan, P. A., & Innes, C. A. (1986). Preventing domestic violence against women. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
  39. Logan, T. K., Walker, R., & Leukefeld, C. G. (2001). Rural, urban influenced and urban differences among domestic violence arrests. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16(3), 266–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Martin, M. (1994). Mandatory arrest for domestic violence: the courts’ response. Criminal Justice Review, 19(2), 212–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Maxwell, C. D., Garner, J. H., & Fagan, J. A. (2001). Effects of arrest on intimate partner violence: New evidence from the spouse assault replication program. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  42. Rennison, C. (2003). Intimate partner violence 1993–2001. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
  43. Robinson, A. L., & Chandek, M. S. (2000). Philosophy into practice? Community policing units and domestic violence victim participation. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 23, 280–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rooney, J., & Hanson, R. K. (2001). Predicting attrition from treatment programs for abusive men. Journal of Family Violence, 16(2), 131–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rosenfeld, B. D. (1992). Court-ordered treatment of spouse abuse. Clinical Psychology Review, 12, 205–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schmidt, J., & Steury, E. H. (1989). Prosecutorial discretion in filing charges in domestic violence cases. Criminology, 27(3), 487–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schulman, M. (1979). A survey of spousal violence against women in Kentucky. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  48. Shepard, M. (1992). Predicting batterer recidivism five years after community intervention. Journal of Family Violence, 7(3), 167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sherman, L. W., & Berk, R. A. (1984a). The Minneapolis domestic violence experiment. Washington, DC: Police Foundation.Google Scholar
  50. Sherman, L. W., & Berk, R. A. (1984b). The specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic assault. American Sociological Review, 49, 261–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Smith, D. (1987). Police to interpersonal violence: defining the parameters of legal control. Social Forces, 65(3), 767–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stanko, E. A. (1985). Would you believe this woman? In N. H. Rafter & E. A. Stanko (Eds.), Judge, lawyer, victim, thief: Women, gender roles and criminal justice. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Tellefson, D. R., & Gross, E. R. (2006). Predicting recidivism following participation in a treatment program for batterers. Journal of Social Service Research, 32(4), 39–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Woolredge, J., & Thistlethwaite, A. (2005). Court dispositions and rearrest for intimate assault. Crime & Delinquency, 51(75), 75–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Worden, R. E., & Shepard, R. (1996). Demeanor, crime and police behavior: a reexamination of the Police Service Study data. Criminology, 34, 83–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yarborough, D. N., & Blanton, P. W. (2000). Socio-demographic indicators of intervention program completion with the male court-referred perpetrator of partner abuse. Journal of Criminal Justice, 28, 517–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Hirschel
    • 1
  • Ira W. Hutchison
    • 2
  • Meaghan Shaw
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Criminal Justice and CriminologyUniversity of Massachusetts LowellLowellUSA
  2. 2.Department of Sociology and Social WorkNorthern Michigan UniversityMarquetteUSA
  3. 3.Department of Criminal Justice and CriminologyUniversity of Massachusetts LowellLowellUSA

Personalised recommendations