Journal of Family Violence

, Volume 24, Issue 8, pp 607–617 | Cite as

Proactive and Reactive Violence among Intimate Partner Violent Men Diagnosed with Antisocial and Borderline Personality Disorder

Original Article


Personality disorder features have been an important basis of many batterer typologies (Babcock et al. J Fam Violence 15:391–409, 2000; Holtzworth-Munroe and Stuart Psychol Bull 116:476–497, 1994), most notably Antisocial and Borderline Personality Disorders. Aggression that partner violent men commit has also been found to be heterogeneous, motivated by the need to control (proactive) or enacted out of emotion (reactive). In the present study, men who were physically abusive towards their female partner (N = 124 couples) were administered the SCID-II diagnostic interview for Antisocial (ASPD) and Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD). It was hypothesized that partner violent men diagnosed with ASPD would show highest levels of proactive violence whereas men diagnosed with BPD (alone or comorbidly with ASPD) were expected to be reactively violent. Results suggest that violence perpetrated by men with different personality disorders differs in its function. Within the context of intimate relationships, BPD/comorbid men appear to use violence more reactively, while ASPD men tend to use violence both proactively and reactively. Implications for treatment are discussed.


Proactive violence Reactive violence Partner violence Personality disorders 


  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th edition text revised. Washington, DC: APA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Babcock, J. C., Jacobson, N. S., Gottman, J. M., & Yerington, T. P. (2000). Attachment, emotional regulation, and the function of marital violence: differences between secure, preoccupied and dismissing violent and nonviolent husbands. Journal of Family Violence, 15, 391–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Babcock, J. C., Green, C. E., & Robie, C. (2004). Does batterers’ treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment outcome research. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1023–1053.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Babcock, J. C., Green, C. E., Webb, S. A., & Yerington, T. P. (2005). Psychophysiological profiles of batterers: autonomic emotional reactivity as it predicts the antisocial spectrum of behavior among intimate partner abusers. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 445–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Babcock, J. C., Canady, B., Graham, K. H., & Schart, L. (2007). The evolution of battering interventions: From the dark ages into the scientific age. In J. Hamel & T. Nicholls (Eds.), Family therapy for domestic violence: A practitioner’s guide to gender-inclusive research and treatment (pp. 215–244). NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Bakeman, R. (1983). Computing lag sequential statistics: the ELAG program. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 15(5), 530–535.Google Scholar
  7. Bakeman, R., & Quera, V. (1995). Analyzing interaction: Sequential analysis with SDIS and GSEQ. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press. Original work published 1986.Google Scholar
  9. Bakeman, R., Adamson, L. B., & Strisik, P. (1995). Lags and logs: Statistical approaches to interaction. In J. M. Gottman (Ed.), The analysis of change (pp. 279–308). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Brewin, C. R., Andrews, B., & Gotlib, I. H. (1993). Psychopathology and early experience: a reappraisal of retrospective reports. Psychological Bulletin, 113(1), 82–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown, K. S., & Parsons, R. D. (1998). Accurate identification of childhood aggression: a key to successful intervention. Professional School Counseling, 2(2), 135–140.Google Scholar
  12. Bushman, B. J., & Anderson, C. A. (2001). Is it time to pull the plug on the hostile versus instrumental aggression dichotomy? Psychological Review, 108(1), 273–279.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chase, K. A., O’Leary, K. D., & Heyman, R. E. (2001). Categorizing partner-violent men within the reactive-proactive typology model. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69(3), 567–572.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cornell, D. G., Warren, J., Hawk, G., Stafford, E., Oram, G., & Pine, D. (1996). Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64(4), 783–790.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dodge, K. A., & Coie, J. D. (1987). Social-information-processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children’s peer groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 1146–1158.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dutton, D. G. (2006). Rethinking domestic violence. Vancouver: UBC.Google Scholar
  17. Ehrensaft, M. K., Cohen, P., & Johnson, J. G. (2006). Development of personality disorder symptoms and the risk for partner violence. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115(3), 474–483.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. B. W. (1997). Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV personality disorders, (SCID-II). Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric.Google Scholar
  19. Gottman, J. M., Jacobson, N. S., Rushe, R. H., Shortt, J. W., Babcock, J. C., La Taillade, J. J., et al. (1995). The relationship between heart rate reactivity, emotionally aggressive behavior, and general violence in batterers. Journal of Family Psychology, 9, 227–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hamberger, L. K., & Hastings, J. E. (1986). Personality correlates of men who abuse their partners: a cross-validation study. Journal of Family Violence, 1(4), 323–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hamberger, L. K., Lohr, J. M., Bonge, D., & Tolin, D. F. (1996). A large sample empirical typology of male spouse abusers and its relationship to dimensions of abuse. Violence & Victims, 11, 277–292.Google Scholar
  22. Heyman, R. E., & Schlee, K. (2003). Stopping wife abuse via physical aggression couples treatment. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 7(1–2), 135–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Holtzworth-Munroe, A., & Stuart, G. L. (1994). Typologies of male batterers: three subtypes and differences among them. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 476–497.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jacobson, N. S., Gottman, J. M., Waltz, J., Rushe, R., Babcock, J., & Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (1994). Affect, verbal content, and psychophysiology in the arguments of couples with a violent husband. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62(5), 982–988.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keltner, D., & Kring, A. M. (1998). Emotion, social function, and psychopathology. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 320–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kingsbury, S. J., Lambert, M. T., & Hendrickse, W. (1997). A two-factor model of aggression. Psychiatry, 60(3), 224–232.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Little, T. D., Jones, S. M., Henrich, C. C., & Hawley, P. H. (2003). Disentagling the “whys” from the “whats” of aggressive behaviour. International Journal of Behavior Development, 27(2), 122–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lohr, J. M., Bonge, D., Witte, T. H., Hamberger, L. K., & Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (2005). Consistency and accuracy of batterer typology identification. Journal of Family Violence, 20(4), 253–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Merk, W., deCastro, B. O., & Koops, W. (2005). The distinction between reactive and proactive aggression: utility for theory, diagnosis, and treatment. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 2(2), 197–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Poulin, F., & Boivin, M. (2000). Reactive and proactive aggression: evidence of a two-factor model. Psychological Assessment, 12(2), 115–122.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Quera, V., & Bakeman, R. (2001). GSEQ for windows: new software for the analysis of interaction sequences. DiPAV Quaderni, 2, 9–32.Google Scholar
  32. Raine, A., Dodge, K., Loeber, R., Gatzke-Kopp, L., Lynam, D., Reynolds, C., et al. (2006). The reactive-proactive aggression questionnaire: differential correlates of reactive and proactive aggression in adolescent boys. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ramirez, J. M., & Andreu, J. M. (2006). Aggression, and some related psychological constructs (anger, hostility, and impulsivity): some comments from a research project. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 276–291.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stith, S. M., Rosen, K. H., & McCollum, E. E. (2003). Effectiveness of couples treatment for spouse abuse. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 29(3), 407–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: the Conflict Tactics (CT) scales. Journal of marriage and the family, 41, 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17(3), 283–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tweed, R. G., & Dutton, D. G. (1998). A comparison of impulsive and instrumental subgroups of batterers. Violence and Victims, 13(3), 217–230.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Vitaro, F., & Brendgen, M. (2005). Proactive and reactive aggression: A developmental perspective. In R. E. Tremblay, W. W. Hartup & J. Archer (Eds.), Developmental origins of aggression (pp. 178–201). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  39. Walters, G. D. (2005). Proactive and reactive aggression: A lifestyle view. In J. P. Morgan (Ed.), Psychology of aggression (pp. 29–43). Hauppauge: Nova Science.Google Scholar
  40. Waltz, J., Babcock, J. C., Jacobson, N. S., & Gottman, J. M. (2000). Testing a typology of batterers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 658–669.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. White, R. J., & Gondolf, E. W. (2000). Implications of personality profiles for batterer treatment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15(5), 467–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyIndiana University-Purdue University, Fort WayneFort WayneUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of HoustonHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations