Journal of Family Violence

, 24:577 | Cite as

Outcomes from Referring Batterer Program Participants to Mental Health Treatment

Original Article

Abstract

A quasi-experimental study was conducted to investigate the impact of referral to supplemental mental health treatment for batterer program participants who screened positive for mental health problems. The principal outcome measure was re-assault reported during a periodic 12-month follow-up with female partners (n = 308). Batterer program completion and other abuse indicators were also considered. Mandatory court referral to mental health treatment produced no significant improvement in batterer program completion, re-assault and other abuse indicators. These results may be influenced by the low compliance to the referral, since the select number of men who did comply with a mental health evaluation (n = 48 of 148) and those who received treatment (n = 28 of 148) did better than those who did not. Simplified referral procedures or integrated treatment services might prove to be a more effective approach.

Keywords

Domestic violence Batterer counseling Batterer programs Mental health referral Batterer assessment Batterer psychopathology 

References

  1. Austin, J., & Dankwort, J. (1999). Standards for batterer programs. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 152–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennett, L. (1998). In defense of batterer-program standards. Families in Society, 79, 93–97.Google Scholar
  3. Boulet, J., & Boss, M. (1991). Reliability and validity of the brief symptom inventory. Psychological Assessment, 3, 433–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Choca, J., & Van Denburg, E. (1997). Interpretive guide to the Millon clinical multiaxial inventory (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  5. Daly, J. E., & Pelowski, S. (2000). Predictors of dropout among men who batter: a review of studies with implications for research and practice. Violence and Victims, 15, 137–160.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Derogatis, L. (1983). The brief symptom inventory: an introductory report. Psychological Medicine, 13, 595–605.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Derogatis, L. (1993). BSI: Brief symptom inventory, administration, scoring, and procedures manual. Baltimore, MD: Clinical Psychometric Research.Google Scholar
  8. Dunford, F. W. (1992). The measurement of recidivism in cases of spousal assault. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 83, 120–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dutton, D. (1998). The abusive personality: Violence and control in intimate relationships. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  10. Dutton, D., & Kropp, P. (2000). A review of domestic violence risk instruments. Trauma, Violence and Abuse, 1, 171–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Efron, B., & Feldman, D. (1991). Compliance as an explanatory variable in clinical trials. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 86, 9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gavazzi, S., Julian, T., & McKenry, P. (1996). Utilization of the brief symptom inventory to discriminate between violent and nonviolent male relationship partners. Psychological Reports, 79, 1047–1056.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gondolf, E. (1997). Patterns of re-assault in batterer programs. Violence and Victims, 12, 373–387.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gondolf, E. (1999). MCMI results for batterer program participants in four cities: less “pathological” than expected. Journal of Family Violence, 14, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gondolf, E. (2000a). Human subject issues in batterer program evaluation. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, and Trauma, 4, 273–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gondolf, E. (2000b). Re-assault at 30-months after batterer program intake. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 44, 111–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gondolf, E. (2002). Batterer intervention systems: Issues, outcomes, and recommendations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Gondolf, E. (2007a). Theoretical and research support for the Duluth model: a reply to Dutton and Corvo. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 644–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gondolf, E. (2007b). Supplemental mental health treatment for batterer program participants. Washington, DC: Final report submitted to the National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
  20. Gondolf, E., & Jones, A. (2001). The program effect of batterer programs in three cities. Violence and Victims, 16, 693–704.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hamberger, L. K. (2002). The men’s group program: A community-based, cognitive-behavioral, pro-feminist intervention program. In E. Aldarondo & F. Mederos (Eds.), Men who batter: Intervention and prevention strategies in a diverse society (pp. 7-1–7-43). New York: Civic Research Institute.Google Scholar
  22. Hamberger, L., & Hastings, J. (1991). Personality correlates of men who batter and nonviolent men: some continuities and discontinuities. Journal of Family Violence, 6, 131–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hamberger, L., Lohr, J., Bonge, D., & Tolin, D. (1996). A large sample empirical typology of male spouse abusers and its relationship to dimensions of abuse. Violence and Victims, 11, 277–292.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Heckert, A., & Gondolf, E. (2004). Battered women’s perceptions of risk versus risk factors and instruments in predicting repeat re-assault. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 778–800.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Holtzworth-Munroe, A., & Stuart, G. (1994). Typologies of male batterers: three subtypes and the differences among them. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 476–497.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jones, A., & Gondolf, E. (2001). Time-varying risk factors for re-assault by batterer program participants. Journal of Family Violence, 16, 345–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marshall, L. (1992). Development of the severity of violence against women scales. Journal of Family Violence, 7, 103–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mederos, F. (2002). Changing our visions of intervention: The evolution of programs for physically abusive men. In E. Aldarondo & F. Mederos (Eds.), Men who batter: Intervention and prevention strategies in a diverse society (pp. 1-2–1-26). New York: Civic Research Institute.Google Scholar
  29. Millon, T. (1994). Millon clinical multiaxial inventory-III manual. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.Google Scholar
  30. Monahan, J., Steadman, H., Sliver, E., Appelbaum, P., Robbins, P., Mulvey, E., et al. (2001). Rethinking risk assessment: The MacArthur study of mental disorder and violence. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Murray, K. (2001). Validating the brief symptom inventory for use with a correctional population. Dissertation Abstracts International, Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 61, 2607.Google Scholar
  32. Pence, E., & Paymar, M. (1993). Education groups for men who batter: The Duluth model. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  33. Pence, E., & Shepard, M. (Eds.). (1999). Coordinated community response to domestic violence. Thousand Oaks, CA; Sage.Google Scholar
  34. Peterson, C. (1989). Review of the brief symptom inventory. In J. Conoley & J. Kramer (Eds.), The tenth mental measurements yearbook. Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.Google Scholar
  35. Pettit, L., & Smith, R. (2002). The AMEND model. In E. Aldarondo & F. Mederos (Eds.), Men who batter: Intervention and prevention strategies in a diverse society (pp. 8-1–8-23). New York: Civic Research Institute.Google Scholar
  36. Roehl, J., & Guertin, K. (2000). Intimate partner violence: the current use of risk assessments in sentencing offenders. Justice System Journal, 21, 171–197.Google Scholar
  37. Shepard, M., & Campbell, J. (1992). The abusive behavior inventory: a measure of psychological and physical abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 7, 291–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stordeur, R., & Stille, R. (1989). Ending men’s violence against their partners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. Straus, M. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: the Conflict Tactics (CT) scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tolman, R. (1989). The development of a measure of psychological maltreatment of women by their male partners. Violence and Victims, 4, 159–177.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Tolman, R., & Bennett, L. (1990). A review of quantitative research on men who batter. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 5, 87–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. White, R., & Gondolf, E. (2000). Implications of personality profiles for batterers treatment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 467–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wilson, D., Mitchell, O., & MacKenzie, D. (2006). A systematic review of drug court effects on recidivism. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2, 459–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zimmerman, M. (2002). Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire (PDSQ). Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mid-Atlantic Addiction Research and Training InstituteIndiana University of PennsylvaniaIndianaUSA

Personalised recommendations