Journal of Family Violence

, 24:27 | Cite as

Gender Inequality and Patterns of Abuse Post Leaving

  • Lorraine Davies
  • Marilyn Ford-Gilboe
  • Joanne Hammerton
Original article

Abstract

Drawing on Connell’s (Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. California: Stanford University Press, 1987; Masculinities. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1995) model of gender relations, this paper examines patterns of intimate partner violence among women who have recently left an abusive partner. In so doing, we attempt to better understand the social structural factors that shape the relations of power and control in intimate violent heterosexual unions. The data come from the first wave of a longitudinal prospective survey of 309 women who had left an abusive partner in the previous 3 years. Our data suggest that structured relations of inequality, namely relations of production, power and cathexis, shape women’s risk of abuse and harassment after leaving, and do so in ways that shape relations of coercive control. These results have implications for understanding the social context within which male violence against women occurs, and how this context constrains and/or enables women’s strategies for leaving and safety.

Keywords

Intimate partner violence Gender inequality Patterns of abuse 

References

  1. Anderson, D. K., & Saunders, D. G. (2003). Leaving an abusive partner: an empirical review of predictors, the process of leaving, and psychological well-being. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 4(2), 163–191. doi:10.1177/1524838002250769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andreb, H. J., & Brockel, M. (2007). Income and life satisfaction after marital disruption in Germany. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 69, 500–512. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00379.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arendell, T. (1995). Fathers & divorce: At the intersection of family and gender. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Bowlus, A. J., & Seitz, S. N. (2006). Domestic violence, employment and divorce. International Economic Review, 47(4), 1113–1149. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2354.2006.00408.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell, J., Rose, L., Kub, J., & Nedd, D. (1998). Voices of strength and resistance: a contextual and longitudinal analysis of women’s responses to battering. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 13(6), 743–762. doi:10.1177/088626098013006005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  8. Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (1998). Cross-border encounters: challenges and opportunities. In R. E. Dobash, & R. P. Dobash (Eds.), Rethinking violence against women (pp. 1–22). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Fleury, R. E., Sullivan, C. M., & Bybee, D. I. (2000). When ending the relationship does not end the violence: women’s experiences of violence by former partners. Violence Against Women, 6(12), 1363–1383. doi:10.1177/10778010022183695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ford-Gilboe, M., Wuest, J., & Merritt-Gray, M. (2005). Strengthening capacity to limit intrusion: theorizing family health promotion in the aftermath of woman abuse. Qualitative Health Research, 15(4), 477–501. doi:10.1177/1049732305274590.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fox, G. L., Benson, M. L., DeMaris, A. A., & Van Wyk, J. (2002). Economic distress and intimate violence: testing family stress and resources theories. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 64(3), 793–807. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00793.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hardesty, J. L. (2002). Separation assault in the context of postdivorce parenting: an integrative review of the literature. Violence Against Women, 8(5), 597–625. doi:10.1177/107780102400388452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hardesty, J. L., & Chung, G. H. (2006). Intimate partner violence, parental divorce, and child custody: directions for intervention and future research. Family Relations, 55(2), 200–210. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2006.00370.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jaffe, P. G., Lemon, N. K. D., & Poisson, S. E. (2003). Child custody & domestic violence: A call for safety and accountability. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Johnson, H. (1995). Risk factors associated with non-lethal violence against women by marital partners. In C. R. Block, & R. Block (Eds.), Questions and answers in lethal and nonlethal violence (vol. 3, pp. 151–168). Washington DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
  16. Johnson, M. P. (2006). Conflict and control: gender symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 12(11), 1003–1018. doi:10.1177/1077801206293328.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kernic, M. A., Monary-Ernsdorff, D. J., Koepsell, J. K., & Holt, V. L. (2005). Children in the crossfire: child custody determination among couples with a history of intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 11(8), 991–1021. doi:10.1177/1077801205278042.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Krieger, N., Williams, D. R., & Moss, M. E. (1997). Measuring social class in US Public Health research: concepts, methodologies and guidelines. Annual Review of Public Health, 18, 341–378. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.18.1.341.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kurz, D. (1996). Separation, divorce and woman abuse. Violence Against Women, 2(1), 63–81. doi:10.1177/1077801296002001004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mahoney, M. (1991). Legal images of battered women: redefining the issue of separation. Michigan Law Review, 90, 1–94. doi:10.2307/1289533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McCloskey, L. A. (1996). Socioeconomic and coercive power within the family. Gender & Society, 10(4), 449–463. doi:10.1177/089124396010004006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McFarlane, J. M., Campbell, J. C., Wilt, S., Sachs, C. J., Ulrich, Y., & Xu, X. (1999). Stalking and Intimate Partner Femicide. Homicide Studies, 3(4), 300–316. doi:10.1177/1088767999003004003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McMullin, J. A., Davies, L., & Cassidy, G. L. (2002). Welfare reform in Ontario: tough times in mothers’ lives. Canadian Public Policy, 28(2), 297–314. doi:10.2307/3552330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Parker, B., & McFarlane, J. (1991). Nursing assessment of the battered pregnant woman. American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing, 16, 161–164. doi:10.1097/00005721-199105000-00013.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Piispa, M. (2002). Complexity of patterns of violence against women in heterosexual partnerships. Violence Against Women, 8(7), 873–900. doi:10.1177/107780102400388515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ross, C. E., & Sastry, J. (1999). The sense of personal control: social-structural causes and emotional consequences. In C. S. Aneshensel, & J. C. Phelan (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of mental health (pp. 369–394). New York: Kluwer Academic-Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
  27. Sev’er, A. (1997). Recent or imminent separation and intimate partner violence against women. Violence Against Women, 3(6), 566–589. doi:10.1177/1077801297003006002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sheridan, D. J. (1998). Measuring harassment of abused women: A nursing concern. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon.Google Scholar
  29. Smith, P. H., Earp, J., & DeVellis, R. (1995). Measuring battering: development of the women’s experience with battering (WEB) scale. Women’s Health: Research on Gender, Behavior, and Policy, 1(4), 273–288.Google Scholar
  30. Smith, P. H., Edwards, G., & DeVellis, R. (1998). Intimate partner violence: Prevalence, co-occurrence, and health consequences. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association.Google Scholar
  31. Smith, P. H., Thornton, G. E., DeVellis, R., Earp, J., & Coker, A. L. (2002). A population-based study of the prevalence and distinctiveness of battering, physical assault, and sexual assault in intimate relationships. Violence Against Women, 8(10), 1208–1232. doi:10.1177/107780102320562691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stark, E. (2006). Commentary on Johnson’s conflict and control: gender symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 12(11), 1019–1025. doi:10.1177/1077801206293329.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Statistics Canada (1997). Family income after separation, 1987 to 1993. Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
  34. Tichenor, V. J. (1999). Status and income as gendered resources: the case of marital power. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61(3), 638–650. doi:10.2307/353566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Extent, nature and consequences of intimate partner violence: Findings from the national violence against women survey. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
  36. Varcoe, C. (1996). Theorizing oppression: implications of nursing research on violence against women. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 28, 61–78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Varcoe, C. (2008). Inequality, violence and women’s health. In B. S. Bolaria, & H. Dickinson (Eds.), Health, illness and health care in Canada (pp. 259–282, 4th ed.). Toronto: Nelson.Google Scholar
  38. Varcoe, C., & Irwin, L. (2004). “If I killed you, I’d get the kids.” Women’s survival and protection work with child custody and access in the context of woman abuse. Qualitative Sociology, 27(1), 77–99. doi:10.1023/B:QUAS.0000015545.82803.90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1993). Spousal homicide risk and estrangement. Violence and Victims, 8, 3–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Wilson, M., Johnson, H., & Daly, M. (1995). Lethal and nonlethal violence against wives. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 37(3), 331–362.Google Scholar
  41. Wuest, J., Ford-Gilboe, M., Merritt-Gray, M., & Berman, H. (2003). Intrusion: the central problem for family health promotion among children and single mothers after leaving an abusive partner. Qualitative Health Research, 13(5), 597–622. doi:10.1177/1049732303013005002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wuest, J., Ford-Gilboe, M., Merritt-Gray, M., & Lemire, S. (2006). Using grounded theory to generate a theoretical understanding of the effects of child custody policy on women’s health promotion in the context of intimate partner violence. Health Care for Women International, 27, 490–512.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wuest, J., & Merritt-Gray, M. (1999). Not going back: sustaining the separation in the process of leaving abusive relationships. Violence Against Women, 5(2), 110–133.Google Scholar
  44. Wuest, J., Merritt-Gray, M., & Ford-Gilboe, M. (2004). Regenerating family: strengthening the emotional health of mothers and children in the context of intimate partner violence. ANS. Advances in Nursing Science, 27(4), 257–274.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lorraine Davies
    • 1
  • Marilyn Ford-Gilboe
    • 2
  • Joanne Hammerton
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SociologyThe University of Western OntarioLondonCanada
  2. 2.School of NursingThe University of Western OntarioLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations