Journal of Family Violence

, 23:655 | Cite as

The Importance of Male Batters’ Attributions in Understanding and Preventing Domestic Violence

  • Helene S. Wallach
  • Tsipi Sela
Original article


The present article reviews the literature regarding the importance of taking into account male batters’ attributions in order to understand and to curtail their violence. Many treatment programs have been devised to stop domestic violence (DV); however, little comparative research exists. Therefore, we are unable to determine which techniques are effective and which are not. We contend that uncovering battering men’s attributions is important in understanding DV, and specifically, that these attributions are the key to curtailing DV. We present a typology of battering men’s attributions. What is common to these attribution styles is the evasion of responsibility for commission of, and for the need to take affirmative action to stop, the violence. These attribution styles have been found to increase battering men’s hostility and stress, their risk for engaging in violent behavior, as well as enabling battering men to continue their violence unchecked. Therefore, attributions are a crucial ingredient in DV and must be addressed directly and intensely in DV treatment programs in order to increase their (as yet limited) effectiveness.


Attributions Domestic violence Battering men Domestic violence—causes Domestic violence—treatment 


  1. Abramson, L. Y., Semmel, A., & von Baeyer, C. (1979). Depressive attributional style. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 88, 242–247.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Babcock, J. C., Green, C. E., & Robie, C. (2004). Does batterers’ treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1023–1053.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beck, J. (1995). Cognitive therapy: basics and beyond. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, A. T., Emery, G., & Greenberg, R. (1985). Anxiety disorders and phobias: a cognitive perspective. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  5. Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive Therapy of Depression. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  6. Beckman, L. (1973). Teachers’ and observers’ perception of causality for a child`s perfomance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 198–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bogard, M. (1988). How battered abusive men account for domestic violence: excuses, justifications, or explanations? In G. T. Hotaling, D. Finkelhor, J. T. Kirkpatric, & M. A. Straus (Eds.), Coping with family violence: research and policy perspectives (pp. 60–70). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Bradbury, T. N., & Fincham, F. D. (1987). Affect and cognition in close relationship towards an integrative model. Cognition and Emotion, 1, 59–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bradbury, T. N., & Fincham, F. D. (1990). Attribution in marriage: review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 3–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bradley, G. W. (1978). Self-serving biases in the attribution process: a reexamination of the fact or fiction question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 56–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bryant, S. A., & Spencer, G. A. (2003). University students’ attitudes about attributing blame in domestic violence. Journal of Family Violence, 18, 369–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buchbinder, A. (1993). Talking violence: battering men’s metaphores. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Haifa, Haifa (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  13. Cantos, A. L., Neidig, P. H., & O’Leary, K. D. (1993). Men and women`s attributions of blame for domestic violence. Journal of Family Violence, 8, 289–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Colman, K. H. (1980). Conjugal violence: what 33 men report. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 6, 207–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Copenhaver, M. M. (2000). Testing a social-cognitive model of intimate abusiveness among substance-dependent males. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 26, 603–628.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dobash, R. P., Dobash, R. E., & Cavanagh, K. (1998). Separate and intersecting reality. Violence Against Women, 4, 382–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dutton, D. G. (1986). Wife assaulter`s explanations for assault: the neutralization of self punishment. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 18, 381–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dutton, D. G., Van Ginkel, C., & Starzomski, A. (1995). The role of shame and guilt in the integrational transmission of abusiveness. Violence and Victims, 10, 121–131.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Eisikovits, Z., Fishman, G., & Gustavo, M. (2000). Survey of the extent and the characteristics of domestic violence towards women and children and adolescents. Haifa: Minerva School for the study of youth (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  20. Eisikovits, Z., Goldblatt, A., & Winstok, Z. (1999). Partner accounts of intimate violence: towards a theoretical model. Families in Society, 80, 606–619.Google Scholar
  21. Ellis, A., & Dryden, W. (1987). The practice of rational emotive therapy. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  22. Feather, N. T., & Simon, J. G. (1971). Attribution of responsibility and valance of outcome in relation to initial confidence and success and failure of self and other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 173–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fincham, F. D., & Bradbury, T. N. (1987). The impect of attribution in marriage: a longitudinal analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 510–517.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fincham, F. D., & Bradbury, T. N. (1992). Assessing attributions in marriage. The relationship attribution measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 457–468.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fincham, F. D., Bradbury, T. N., Arias, I., Bryne, C. A., & Karney, B. R. (1997). Marital violence, marital distress, and attribution. Journal of Psychology, 11, 367–372.Google Scholar
  26. Goldblatt, A. (1989). Justifications: Mirroring marital violence. Unpublished master’s thesis, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  27. Gondolf, E. W. (1987a). Changing men who batter: a development model for integrated interventions. Journal of Family Violence, 2, 335–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gondolf, E. W. (1987b). Evaluating programs for men who batter: problems and prospects. Journal of Family Violence, 2, 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harrison, L. A., & Esqueda, C. W. (2000). Effects of race and victim drinking on domestic violence attributions. Sex Roles, 42, 1043–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hartaf, H., Levine-Rozalis, M., & Bar-On, N. (2003). Results of a unique treatment intervention for violent men in Beit Noam—successes, limits and difficulties. Educational Social Work, 17, 65–87 (In Hebrew).Google Scholar
  31. Heider, F. (1944). Social perception and phenomenal causality. Psychological Review, 51, 358–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Henning, K., Jones, A. R., & Holdford, R. (2005). “I didn’t do it, but if I did I had a good reason”: minimization, denial, and attributions of blame among male and female domestic violence offenders. Journal of Family Violence, 20, 131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hilt, L. M. (2004). Attribution retraining for therapeutic change: theory, practice, and future directions. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 23, 289–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (1988). Causal attribution in marital violence: theoretical and methodological issues. Clinical Psychology Review, 8, 331–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (1991). Applying the social information processing model to maritally violent men. The Behavior Therapist, 14, 129–132.Google Scholar
  36. Holtzworth-Munroe, A., & Hutchinson, G. (1993). Attribution negative intent to wife behavior: the attribution of maritally violent vs. nonviolent men. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 206–211.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Holtzworth-Munroe, A., & Jacobson, N. (1985). Causal attribution of married couples: when do they search for causes? What do they conclude when they do? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1398–1412.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hotaling, G. T. (1980). Attributional processes in husband-wife violence. In M. A. Straus & G. T. Hotaling (Eds.), The social causes of husband-wife violence (pp. 136–154). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  39. Ickes, W. J., & Layden, M. A. (1978). Attributional styles. In J. H. Harvey, W. J. Ickes, & R. F. Kidds (Eds.), New direction in attribution research, vol. 2 (pp. 119–152). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  40. Ingbar, H. (1997). Everyday psychodynamics of blame avoidance: use of justifications as a function of the possibility of blame. Unpublished master’s thesis, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan. (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  41. Jacobson, N. S., McDonald, D. W., Follette, W. C., & Berley, R. A. (1985). Attribution processes in distressed and nondistressed married couples. Cognitive Theraphy and Research, 9, 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jenkins, A. (1993). Invitations to responsibility. South Australia: Dulwich.Google Scholar
  43. Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: the attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowits (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 2 (pp. 219–260). New York: Acadamic.Google Scholar
  44. Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (2000). Attribution marriage: state or trait? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 295–309.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Karov, A. (1995). Guilt in a violent marital relationship. Unpublished master’s thesis. University of Haifa, Haifa. (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  46. Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  47. King, L. L., & Polaschek, D. L. L. (2003). The abstinence violation effect: investigating lapse and relapse phenomena using the relapse prevention model with domestically violent men. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 32, 67–75.Google Scholar
  48. Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., Shlien-Dellinger, R. K., Huss, M. T., & Kramer, V. L. (2004). Attributions about perpetrators and victims of interpersonal abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 484–498.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lansky, M. R. (1987). Shame and domestic violence. In D. L. Nathanson (Ed.), The many faces of shame (pp. 335–362). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  50. Luginbuhl, J. E. R., Crowe, D. H., & Kaban, J. P. (1975). Causal attributions for success and failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 86–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Margolin, G., Jhon, R. S., & Gleberman, L. (1988). Affective responses to conflictual discussion in violent and nonviolent couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 24–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McLaughlin, M. L., Cody, M. J., & O’Hair, H. D. (1983). The management of failure event. Some contextual determinants of accounting behavior. Human Communication Research, 9, 208–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mears, D. P., & Visher, C. A. (2005). Trends in understanding and addressing domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 204–211.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Miller, D. T. (1976). Ego involvement and attributions for success and failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 901–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Miller, D. T. (1978). What constitutes a self-serving attributional bias? A reply to Bradley. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1221–1223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Miller, D. T., & Ross, M. (1975). Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: fact or fiction? Psychological Bulletin, 82, 213–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Moore, T. M., Eisler, R. M., & Franchina, J. J. (2000). Causal attributions and affective responses to provocative female partner behavior by abusive and nonabusive males. Journal of Family Violence, 15, 69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pederoff, N. A., & Harvey, J. H. (1976). Focus of attention, self-esteem, and the attribution of causality. Journal of Research in Personality, 10, 336–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ptacek, J. (1988). Why do men batter their wives? In K. Illo & M. Bogard (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  60. Ross, L., Bierbrauer, G., & Polly, S. (1974). Attribution of educational outcome by professional and nonprofessional instructors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 609–618.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Shields, N. M., & Hanneke, C. R. (1983). Attribution processes in violent relationships: perceptions of violent husbands and their wives. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13, 515–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sicoly, F., & Ross, M. (1977). Facilitation of ego-biased attributions by means of self-serving observer feedback. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 734–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sillars, A., Roberts, L. J., Dun, T., & Leonard, K. (2000). Stepping into the steam of thought. In V. Manusov & J. H. Harvey (Eds.), Attribution, communication behavior, and close relationship (pp. 193–210). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Simon, T. R., Anderson, M., Thompson, M. P., Crosby, A. E., Shelley, G., & Sacks, J. J. (2001). Attitudinal acceptance of intimate partner violence among U.S. adults. Violence and Victims, 16, 115–126.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Snyder, M. L., Stephan, W. G., & Rosenfield, D. (1976). Egotism and attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 435–441.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Snyder, M. L., Stephan, W. G., & Rosenfield, D. (1978). Attributional egotism. In J. H. Harvey, E. J. Ickes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (pp. 119–152). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  67. Stamp, G. H., & Sabourin, T. C. (1995). Accounting for violence: an analysis of male spousal abuse narratives. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 23, 284–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Stosny, S. (2005). Group treatment of intimate partner abusers. In G. L. Greif & P. H. Ephross (Eds.), Group work with populations at risk (pp. 226–237). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Stover, C. S. (2005). Domestic violence research: what have we learned and where do we go from here? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 448–454.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tonizzo, S., Howells, K., Day, A., Reidpat, D., & Froyland, I. (2000). Attributions of negative partner behavior by men who physically abuse their partners. Journal of Family Violence, 15, 155–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wallach, H. S. (2000). Patient treatment interaction: where are we and how do we proceed. Israel Journal of Psychiatry, 37, 51–63.Google Scholar
  72. Weary, G., & Arkin, R. M. (1981). Attributional self-presentation. In J. H. Harvey, W. Ickes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attributional research (pp. 223–246). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  73. Weiner, B., Russell, D., & Lerman, D. (1978). Affective consequences of causal ascription. In J. Harvey, W. Ickes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research, vol. 2 (pp. 59–90). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  74. Worden, A. P., & Carlson, B. E. (2005). Attitudes and beliefs about domestic violence: results of a public opinion survey II. Beliefs about causes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 1219–1243.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wortman, C. B., Costanzo, P. R., & Witt, T. R. (1973). Effect of anticipated performance on the attributions of causality to self and others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 372–381.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Yandell, B., & Insko, C. A. (1977). Attribution of attitudes to speakers and listeners under assigned behavior conditions: does behavior engulf the field? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 269–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of HaifaHaifaIsrael
  2. 2.The Max Stern Academic College of Emek YezreelEmek YezreelIsrael

Personalised recommendations