Journal of Family Violence

, 23:395 | Cite as

Articulated Thoughts of Intimate Partner Abusive Men during Anger Arousal: Correlates with Personality Disorder Features

Original Article

Abstract

This study extends Eckhardt et al. (Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66:259–269, 1998) research on cognitive correlates of anger arousal among intimate partner abusers (IPA; n = 130), distressed/nonviolent (DNV; n = 27), and satisfied/nonviolent men (SNV; n = 21) during a standardized anger induction task by examining variables thought to differentiate batterers. Variables pertinent to the Holtzworth-Munroe and Stuart (Psychological Bulletin, 116:476–497, 1994) typology—borderline and antisocial personality, psychopathy, general violence, and partner violence—were correlated to articulated cognitive distortions. Since between group comparisons were not significant, articulated anger was correlated with antisocial, borderline, and psychopathic features. Borderline personality features correlated positively with articulations reflecting jealousy. Articulated themes were more consistently related to psychopathology than to violence, suggesting that tailoring treatments to personality features of clients may prove fruitful.

Keywords

Cognitive distortions Personality disorders ATSS Intimate partner abuse 

References

  1. American Psychological Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, Fourth Ed.-TR. Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar
  2. Babcock, J. C., Canady, B., Graham, K. H., & Schart, L. (2007). The evolution of battering interventions: From the dark ages into the scientific age. In J. Hamel, & T. Nicholls (Eds.) Family therapy for domestic violence: A practitioner’s guide to gender-inclusive research and treatment (pp. 215–244). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Babcock, J. C., Green, C. E., Webb, S. A., & Yerington, T. P. (2005). Psychophysiological profiles of batterers: Autonomic emotional reactivity as it predicts the antisocial spectrum of behavior among intimate partner abusers. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 11, 445–455.Google Scholar
  4. Babcock, J. C., Jacobson, N. S., Gottman, J. M., & Yerington, T. P. (2000). Attachment, emotional regulation, and the function of marital violence: Differences between secure, preoccupied and dismissing violent and nonviolent husbands. Journal of Family Violence, 15, 391–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Babcock, J. C., Senior, A.C., & Green, C. E. (2008). Intimate partner abuse and PTSD symptomology: Examining mediators and moderators of the abuse-trauma link. Journal of Family Psychology (in press).Google Scholar
  6. Barbour, K. A., Eckhardt, C. I., Davison, G. C., & Kassinove, H. (1998). The experience and expression of anger in martially violent and martially discordant-nonviolent men. Behavior Therapy, 29, 173–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cleckley, H. M. (1941). The mask of sanity. St Louis: Mosby.Google Scholar
  8. Costa, D. M. (2004). Cognitive distortions coding system for personality traits. Unpublished manual. University of Houston.Google Scholar
  9. Costa, D. M, Canady, B, & Babcock, J. C. (2007). Preliminary report on the Accountability Scale: A change and outcome measure for intimate partner violence research. Violence & Victims, 22, 513–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davison, G. C., Robins, C., & Johnson, M. K. (1983). Articulated thoughts during simulated situations: A paradigm for studying cognition in emotion in behavior. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 7, 17–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dutton, D. G. (1995). The batterer: A psychological profile. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  12. Dutton, D. G., & Browning, J. J. (1988). Concern for power, fear of intimacy, and aversive stimuli for wife assault. In G. T. Hotaling, J. T. Kirkpatrick, & M. Straus (Eds.) Family abuse and its consequences: New directions in family violence research (pp. 163–175). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Eckhardt, C. I., Barbour, K. A., & Davison, G. C. (1998). Articulated thoughts of martially violent and nonviolent men during anger arousal. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 259–269.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gottman, J. M., Jacobson, N. S., Rushe, R. H., Shortt, J. W., Babcock, J. C., La Taillade, J. J., et al. (1995). The relationship between heart rate reactivity, emotionally aggressive behavior, and general violence in batterers. Journal of Family Psychology, 9, 227–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Greenberg, L. S. (1993). Emotion and change processes in psychotherapy. In M. Lewis, & J. M. Haviland (Eds.) Handbook of emotions (pp. 499–508). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  16. Greenberg, L. S., & Safran, J. D. (1989). Emotion in psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 44, 19–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hare, R. D. (1991). The hare psychopathy checklist-revised (PCL-R). Ontario, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
  18. Hare, R. D., Harpur, T. J., & Hemphill, J. F. (1989). The Self-report of Psychopathy-II. Scoring pamphlet. Unpublished document. Vancouver, B.C.: Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
  19. Heard, H. L., & Linehan, M. M. (1993). Problems of self and borderline personality disorder: a dialectical behavioral analysis. In Z. V. Segal, & S. J. Blatt (Eds.) The self in emotional distress: Cognitive Psychodynamic perspectives. NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  20. Holtzworth-Munroe, A., & Hutchinson, G. (1993). Attributing negative intent to wife behavior: The attributions of martially violent versus nonviolent men. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 206–211.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Meehan, J. C., Herron, K., Rehman, U., & Stuart, G. L. (2000). Testing the Holtzworth-Munroe and Stuart (1994) Batterer Typology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 1000–1019.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Holtzworth-Munroe, A., & Stuart, G. L. (1994). Typologies of male batterers: Three subtypes and the differences among them. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 476–497.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Millon, T. (1994). Manual for the MCMI-III (3rd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.Google Scholar
  24. Pence, E., & Paymar, M. (1993). Education groups for men who batter: The Duluth Model. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Sonkin, D. J., Martin, D., & Walker, L. E. A. (1985). The male batterer: A treatment approach. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Spielberger, C. D. (1988). Manual for the state-trait anger expression inventory. Odessa, FL: PAR.Google Scholar
  28. Stosny, S. (1995). Treating attachment abuse: A compassionate approach. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  29. Straus, M., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Waltz, J., Babcock, J. C., Jacobson, N. S., & Gottman, J. M. (2000). Testing a typology of batterers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 658–669.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wexler, D. B. (2000). Domestic violence 2000: Group leader’s manual. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  32. Widiger, T. A., & Corbitt, E. M. (1997). Comorbidity of antisocial personality disorder with other personality disorders. In D. M. Stoff, J. Breiling, & J. D. Maser (Eds.)Handbook of Antisocial Behavior (pp. 75–82). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of HoustonHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations