Advertisement

Journal of Family Violence

, Volume 22, Issue 7, pp 533–542 | Cite as

The Relationship of Acculturation and Social Integration to Assaults on Intimate Partners Among Mexican American and Non-Mexican White Students

  • Ignacio Luis RamirezEmail author
Article

Abstract

This study examined the role that Mexican ethnicity, acculturation into Anglo American society, and social integration play in intimate partner violence among a sample of 348 college students. The results indicated that Mexican American ethnicity and acculturation into Anglo American society by Mexican American college students had no relation to intimate partner violence. However, integration into society was associated with a decreased probability of severely assaulting a partner among both Mexican Americans and Non-Mexican Whites. The results support a control theory perspective (social integration) on intimate partner violence.

Keywords

Ethnicity Intimate partner violence Mexican American Social integration Acculturation 

References

  1. Archer, J. (1999). Assessment of the reliability of the Conflict Tactics Scales: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(12), 1263–1289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benson, M. L., Fox, G. L., DeMaris, A., & Van Wyk, J. (2000). Violence in families: The intersection of race, poverty, and community context. In G. L. Fox & M. L. Benson (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives in family research (Vol. 2, pp. 91–109). New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  3. Berry, J. W., & Kim, U. (1988). Acculturation and mental health. In J. W. Berry & N. Sartorius (Eds.), Health and cross-cultural psychology:Towards application (pp. 207–236). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Champion, J. D. (1996). Woman abuse, assimilation, and self-concept in a rural Mexican American community. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 18(4), 508–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cronbach, L. J. (1970). Essentials of psychological testing (3rd ed.). New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  6. Cuellar, I., Harris, L. C., & Jasso, R. (1980). An acculturation scale for Mexican American normal and clinical populations. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 2(3), 199–217.Google Scholar
  7. Fagan, J. A., Stewart, D. K., & Hansen, K. V. (1983). Violent men or violent husbands? Background factors and situational correlates. In D. Finkelhor, R. J. Gelles, G. T. Hotaling & M. A. Straus (Eds.), The dark side of families (pp. 49–68). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Hamilton, L. (1998). Statistics with Stata 5. Boston, Massachusetts: Duxbury.Google Scholar
  9. Hirschi, T. (1969). The causes of delinquency. Berkeley and Los Angeles, California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  10. Jasinski, J. (1998). The role of acculturation in wife assault. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 20(2), 175–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kaufman Kantor, G., Jasinski, J., & Aldarondo, E. (1994). Socioeconomic status and incidence of marital violence in Hispanic families. Violence and Victims, 9, 207–222.Google Scholar
  12. Lackey, C., & Williams, K. R. (1995). Social bonding and the cessation of partner violence across generations. Journal of Marriage and the family, 57, 295–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Maxwell, C. D., Garner, J. H., & Fagan, J. A. (2001). The effects of arrest on intimate partner violence: New evidence from spouse assault replication program. National Institute of Justice: Research in Brief.Google Scholar
  14. O’Leary, K. D., Malone, J., & Tyree, A. (1994). Physical aggression in early marriage: Prerelationship and relationship effects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62(3), 594–602.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Olmedo, E. L., & Padilla, A. M. (1978). Empirical and construct validation of a measure of acculturation for Mexican Americans. Journal of Social Psychology, 105, 179–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Renison, C. M., & Welchans, S. (2000). Intimate partner violence. Statistics special report Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice.Google Scholar
  17. Reynolds, W. M. (1982). Development of reliable and valid short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38(1), 119–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rogler, L. H., Cortes, D. E., & Malgaday, R. G. (1991). Acculturation and mental health status among Hispanics. American Psychologists, 46, 585–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ross, S. B., & Straus, M. A. (1995). The social integration scale. Paper presented at the at the 4th International Conference on Family Violence Research, Durham, NH.Google Scholar
  20. Sherman, L. (1992). Policing domestic violence: Experiments and dilemmas. New York: Free.Google Scholar
  21. Sorenson, S. B., & Telles, C. A. (1988). Violence in Hispanic families: Immigration issues. Paper presented at the Research Conference of Violence and Homicide in Hispanic Communities, Los Angeles California.Google Scholar
  22. Sorenson, S. B., & Telles, C. A. (1991). Self reports of spousal violence in a Mexican American and Non-Hispanic White population. Violence & Victims, 6, 3–15.Google Scholar
  23. Sorenson, S. B., Upchurch, D. M., & Shen, H. (1996). Violence and injury in marital arguments. American Journal of Public Health, 86, 35–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Straus, M. A. (1990). The Conflict Tactics Scales and its critics: An evaluation and new data on validity and reliability. In M. A. Straus & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families (pp. 49–73). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publications.Google Scholar
  25. Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17(3), 283–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. (1999). The personal and relationships profile (PRP). Durham, NH: Family Research Laboratory, University of New Hampshire.Google Scholar
  27. Straus, M. A., & Mouradian, V. E. (1999, November 19, 1999). Preliminary psychometric data for the personal and relationships profile (PRP): A multi-scale tool for clinical screening and research on partner violence. Paper presented at the American Society of Criminology, Toronto, Ontario.Google Scholar
  28. Straus, M. A., & Smith, C. (1990). Violence in Hispanic families in the United States: Incidence rates and structural interpretations. In M. A. Straus & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families (pp. 341–368). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
  29. Sugarman, D. B., & Hotaling, G. T. (1991). Dating violence: A review of contextual and risk factors. In B. Levy (Ed.), Dating violence: Young women in danger (pp. 100–118). Seattle: Seal.Google Scholar
  30. White, J. W., & Koss, M. P. (1991). Courtship violence: Incidence in a national sample of higher education students. Violence and Victims, 6(4), 247–256.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyTexas Tech UniversityLubbockUSA

Personalised recommendations